Rehab Abdelfattah Abdelraziq, S. Ayoub, Hagar Mahmoud El-Sherief, Mohammed Sayed Shorbagy
{"title":"下颌骨折固定手术鼻气管插管前预先雾化吸入肾上腺素:真的有区别吗?一项随机对照临床试验","authors":"Rehab Abdelfattah Abdelraziq, S. Ayoub, Hagar Mahmoud El-Sherief, Mohammed Sayed Shorbagy","doi":"10.1080/11101849.2023.2200320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction Isolated mandibular fractures as any other fracture are associated with pain and inflammation which possess difficulty for both laryngoscopy and intubation. Nasotracheal intubation is relatively more efficient in individuals with isolated mandibular injuries. Epistaxis is the most common complication of nasal intubation. This study aimed to highlight the role of preoperative usage of epinephrine 1:1000 combined with lidocaine as a nebulization session before induction of anaesthesia as a method to spread vasoconstriction and analgesia. Methods The patients were randomly assigned to one of two equal groups; nasal Lidocaine drops followed by Oxymetazoline nasal drops (OL as control group) or Epinephrine mixed with Lidocaine as nebulization session (EL as the study group). Our primary measures were to estimate the degree of epistaxis and its effect on intubation time. Results Lidocaine with epinephrine as a nebulization session prior to NTI has statistically significant less intubation time (37.8 ± 6.32) versus (42.16 ± 5.1) in the control group with p- value (0.000028). This correlates with higher incidence of moderate nasal bleeding in OL group (7/60 = 11.66%) versus (4/60 = 6.66%) in EL group and P- value = 0.01. EL mixture has a higher priority of decreasing surgical blood loss. Mean± SD measures were (406.86 ± 89.6) and (468.6 ± 139), p-value = 0.00026*in EL and OL groups respectively. Conclusion Despite being time consuming measure. Yet, lidocaine epinephrine nebulization session can be considered as an efficient method for prophylaxis against nasotracheal intubation induced epistaxis, to control intraoperative field bleeding, acts as an adjuvant to control intraoperative pain and protects against postextubation nasal complications.","PeriodicalId":11437,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-emptive epinephrine nebulization prior to nasotracheal intubation for mandibular fracture fixation surgeries: Does it really differ? A randomised controlled clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Rehab Abdelfattah Abdelraziq, S. Ayoub, Hagar Mahmoud El-Sherief, Mohammed Sayed Shorbagy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/11101849.2023.2200320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Introduction Isolated mandibular fractures as any other fracture are associated with pain and inflammation which possess difficulty for both laryngoscopy and intubation. Nasotracheal intubation is relatively more efficient in individuals with isolated mandibular injuries. Epistaxis is the most common complication of nasal intubation. This study aimed to highlight the role of preoperative usage of epinephrine 1:1000 combined with lidocaine as a nebulization session before induction of anaesthesia as a method to spread vasoconstriction and analgesia. Methods The patients were randomly assigned to one of two equal groups; nasal Lidocaine drops followed by Oxymetazoline nasal drops (OL as control group) or Epinephrine mixed with Lidocaine as nebulization session (EL as the study group). Our primary measures were to estimate the degree of epistaxis and its effect on intubation time. Results Lidocaine with epinephrine as a nebulization session prior to NTI has statistically significant less intubation time (37.8 ± 6.32) versus (42.16 ± 5.1) in the control group with p- value (0.000028). This correlates with higher incidence of moderate nasal bleeding in OL group (7/60 = 11.66%) versus (4/60 = 6.66%) in EL group and P- value = 0.01. EL mixture has a higher priority of decreasing surgical blood loss. Mean± SD measures were (406.86 ± 89.6) and (468.6 ± 139), p-value = 0.00026*in EL and OL groups respectively. Conclusion Despite being time consuming measure. Yet, lidocaine epinephrine nebulization session can be considered as an efficient method for prophylaxis against nasotracheal intubation induced epistaxis, to control intraoperative field bleeding, acts as an adjuvant to control intraoperative pain and protects against postextubation nasal complications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/11101849.2023.2200320\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11101849.2023.2200320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pre-emptive epinephrine nebulization prior to nasotracheal intubation for mandibular fracture fixation surgeries: Does it really differ? A randomised controlled clinical trial
ABSTRACT Introduction Isolated mandibular fractures as any other fracture are associated with pain and inflammation which possess difficulty for both laryngoscopy and intubation. Nasotracheal intubation is relatively more efficient in individuals with isolated mandibular injuries. Epistaxis is the most common complication of nasal intubation. This study aimed to highlight the role of preoperative usage of epinephrine 1:1000 combined with lidocaine as a nebulization session before induction of anaesthesia as a method to spread vasoconstriction and analgesia. Methods The patients were randomly assigned to one of two equal groups; nasal Lidocaine drops followed by Oxymetazoline nasal drops (OL as control group) or Epinephrine mixed with Lidocaine as nebulization session (EL as the study group). Our primary measures were to estimate the degree of epistaxis and its effect on intubation time. Results Lidocaine with epinephrine as a nebulization session prior to NTI has statistically significant less intubation time (37.8 ± 6.32) versus (42.16 ± 5.1) in the control group with p- value (0.000028). This correlates with higher incidence of moderate nasal bleeding in OL group (7/60 = 11.66%) versus (4/60 = 6.66%) in EL group and P- value = 0.01. EL mixture has a higher priority of decreasing surgical blood loss. Mean± SD measures were (406.86 ± 89.6) and (468.6 ± 139), p-value = 0.00026*in EL and OL groups respectively. Conclusion Despite being time consuming measure. Yet, lidocaine epinephrine nebulization session can be considered as an efficient method for prophylaxis against nasotracheal intubation induced epistaxis, to control intraoperative field bleeding, acts as an adjuvant to control intraoperative pain and protects against postextubation nasal complications.