凯伦·阿姆斯特朗的《血的田野:宗教与暴力史》,以及:上帝真的指挥了种族灭绝吗?保罗·科潘和马修·弗兰纳根的《抓住上帝的正义》(评论)

Q3 Social Sciences
S. Jacobs
{"title":"凯伦·阿姆斯特朗的《血的田野:宗教与暴力史》,以及:上帝真的指挥了种族灭绝吗?保罗·科潘和马修·弗兰纳根的《抓住上帝的正义》(评论)","authors":"S. Jacobs","doi":"10.3138/GSI.11.2.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the academic study of religion, on occasion, one studies what has come to be known as ‘‘apologetics,’’ that is, the defense and proof of religious doctrines through systematic arguments and discourses. Though it has a long history, we in the West most often associate it with various iterations of Christianity, yet apologetic works can also be found substantively in Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, and other such expressions of religion. The rationale of such works has a twofold purpose: to ‘‘make sense’’ (i.e., a certain degree of rationalism) to the community of adherents to continue their allegiance, and to defend the faithful from attacks by outsiders who regard a given religion and religious community as a threat to the stability and power structure of a given nation-state. Focusing specifically on the question of genocide in the two texts examined below, one is reminded of the comment by Henry Huttenbach, Professor in the History Department of the City College of the City University of New York:","PeriodicalId":40844,"journal":{"name":"Genocide Studies International","volume":"11 1","pages":"261 - 266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3138/GSI.11.2.10","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fields of Blood: Religion and the History of Violence by Karen Armstrong, and: Did God Really Command Genocide? Coming to Grips with the Justice of God by Paul Copan and Matthew Flannagan (review)\",\"authors\":\"S. Jacobs\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/GSI.11.2.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the academic study of religion, on occasion, one studies what has come to be known as ‘‘apologetics,’’ that is, the defense and proof of religious doctrines through systematic arguments and discourses. Though it has a long history, we in the West most often associate it with various iterations of Christianity, yet apologetic works can also be found substantively in Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, and other such expressions of religion. The rationale of such works has a twofold purpose: to ‘‘make sense’’ (i.e., a certain degree of rationalism) to the community of adherents to continue their allegiance, and to defend the faithful from attacks by outsiders who regard a given religion and religious community as a threat to the stability and power structure of a given nation-state. Focusing specifically on the question of genocide in the two texts examined below, one is reminded of the comment by Henry Huttenbach, Professor in the History Department of the City College of the City University of New York:\",\"PeriodicalId\":40844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genocide Studies International\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"261 - 266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3138/GSI.11.2.10\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genocide Studies International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/GSI.11.2.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genocide Studies International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/GSI.11.2.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在宗教的学术研究中,有时会研究所谓的“波罗吉主义”,即通过系统的争论和论述来捍卫和证明宗教教义。尽管它有着悠久的历史,但我们西方人最常将其与基督教的各种迭代联系在一起,但在佛教、印度教、伊斯兰教、犹太教和其他此类宗教表达中也可以找到道歉作品。这类作品的基本原理有两个目的:对信徒群体“有意义”(即一定程度的理性主义),以继续他们的忠诚,并保护信徒免受外界的攻击,因为外界认为特定的宗教和宗教群体对特定民族国家的稳定和权力结构构成威胁。在下面审查的两个文本中,特别关注种族灭绝问题,让人想起纽约城市大学城市学院历史系教授Henry Huttenbach的评论:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fields of Blood: Religion and the History of Violence by Karen Armstrong, and: Did God Really Command Genocide? Coming to Grips with the Justice of God by Paul Copan and Matthew Flannagan (review)
In the academic study of religion, on occasion, one studies what has come to be known as ‘‘apologetics,’’ that is, the defense and proof of religious doctrines through systematic arguments and discourses. Though it has a long history, we in the West most often associate it with various iterations of Christianity, yet apologetic works can also be found substantively in Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, and other such expressions of religion. The rationale of such works has a twofold purpose: to ‘‘make sense’’ (i.e., a certain degree of rationalism) to the community of adherents to continue their allegiance, and to defend the faithful from attacks by outsiders who regard a given religion and religious community as a threat to the stability and power structure of a given nation-state. Focusing specifically on the question of genocide in the two texts examined below, one is reminded of the comment by Henry Huttenbach, Professor in the History Department of the City College of the City University of New York:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genocide Studies International
Genocide Studies International POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信