马来西亚半岛基于社区的泥炭地恢复项目中的使用规则和参与者互动

IF 1.2 4区 农林科学 Q3 FORESTRY
Md.Jahangir Alam, N. Rengasamy, Mohd Puat Bin Dahalan, Sharina Abdul Halim, Y. Istihat, T. Nath
{"title":"马来西亚半岛基于社区的泥炭地恢复项目中的使用规则和参与者互动","authors":"Md.Jahangir Alam, N. Rengasamy, Mohd Puat Bin Dahalan, Sharina Abdul Halim, Y. Istihat, T. Nath","doi":"10.1080/10549811.2021.1941123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study aimed to explore peoples’ perception on rules-in-use and interaction among actors in a community-based peatland restoration program (CBPRP) in Raja Muja Forest Reserve (RMFR) of peninsular Malaysia. We followed Ostrom’s institutional analysis and development framework, and collected both qualitative and quantitative data through organizing a stakeholders’ workshop, 200 structured interviews, four focus group discussions and five key informants’ interviews. Local people claimed that there was significant decline in their rights to access forests (χ2 = 49.42, p = .001), extraction of forest resources (χ2 = 53.02, p = .001), recreational (χ2 = 10.32, p = .001) and agricultural uses (χ2 = 4.35, p = .05) due to change in governance regimes from state forest management toward CBPRP. However, CBPRP introduced several social development programs for local community. This study identified 44 actors under seven categories, and only two actors (Selangor State Forestry Department and Global Environment Center, an NGO) played significant roles in decision-making process and interacted with other actors in peatland restoration actions. Community people had only participated in the implementation of rehabilitation actions. In order to sustain community development and sustainable management of RMFR, we suggest to reform multi-stakeholder governance structure that ensures active participation of local community people.","PeriodicalId":54313,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Forestry","volume":"41 1","pages":"398 - 412"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10549811.2021.1941123","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rules-in-use and Actors’ Interaction in a Community-Based Peatland Restoration Program in Peninsular Malaysia\",\"authors\":\"Md.Jahangir Alam, N. Rengasamy, Mohd Puat Bin Dahalan, Sharina Abdul Halim, Y. Istihat, T. Nath\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10549811.2021.1941123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study aimed to explore peoples’ perception on rules-in-use and interaction among actors in a community-based peatland restoration program (CBPRP) in Raja Muja Forest Reserve (RMFR) of peninsular Malaysia. We followed Ostrom’s institutional analysis and development framework, and collected both qualitative and quantitative data through organizing a stakeholders’ workshop, 200 structured interviews, four focus group discussions and five key informants’ interviews. Local people claimed that there was significant decline in their rights to access forests (χ2 = 49.42, p = .001), extraction of forest resources (χ2 = 53.02, p = .001), recreational (χ2 = 10.32, p = .001) and agricultural uses (χ2 = 4.35, p = .05) due to change in governance regimes from state forest management toward CBPRP. However, CBPRP introduced several social development programs for local community. This study identified 44 actors under seven categories, and only two actors (Selangor State Forestry Department and Global Environment Center, an NGO) played significant roles in decision-making process and interacted with other actors in peatland restoration actions. Community people had only participated in the implementation of rehabilitation actions. In order to sustain community development and sustainable management of RMFR, we suggest to reform multi-stakeholder governance structure that ensures active participation of local community people.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sustainable Forestry\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"398 - 412\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10549811.2021.1941123\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sustainable Forestry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2021.1941123\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainable Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2021.1941123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本研究旨在探讨人们对马来西亚半岛Raja Muja森林保护区(RMFR)基于社区的泥炭地恢复计划(CBPRP)中参与者之间使用和互动规则的看法。我们遵循Ostrom的制度分析和发展框架,通过组织一次利益相关者研讨会、200次结构化访谈、四次焦点小组讨论和五次关键信息者访谈,收集了定性和定量数据。当地人声称,由于从国家森林管理向CBPRP转变的治理制度,他们获得森林的权利(χ2=49.42,p=0.001)、森林资源的开采权(χ2=53.02,p=0.001。然而,CBPRP为当地社区推出了几个社会发展项目。这项研究确定了七类44个参与者,只有两个参与者(雪兰莪州林业部和非政府组织全球环境中心)在决策过程中发挥了重要作用,并在泥炭地恢复行动中与其他参与者互动。社区人民只参与了康复行动的实施。为了维持社区发展和RMFR的可持续管理,我们建议改革多方利益相关者的治理结构,确保当地社区人民的积极参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rules-in-use and Actors’ Interaction in a Community-Based Peatland Restoration Program in Peninsular Malaysia
ABSTRACT This study aimed to explore peoples’ perception on rules-in-use and interaction among actors in a community-based peatland restoration program (CBPRP) in Raja Muja Forest Reserve (RMFR) of peninsular Malaysia. We followed Ostrom’s institutional analysis and development framework, and collected both qualitative and quantitative data through organizing a stakeholders’ workshop, 200 structured interviews, four focus group discussions and five key informants’ interviews. Local people claimed that there was significant decline in their rights to access forests (χ2 = 49.42, p = .001), extraction of forest resources (χ2 = 53.02, p = .001), recreational (χ2 = 10.32, p = .001) and agricultural uses (χ2 = 4.35, p = .05) due to change in governance regimes from state forest management toward CBPRP. However, CBPRP introduced several social development programs for local community. This study identified 44 actors under seven categories, and only two actors (Selangor State Forestry Department and Global Environment Center, an NGO) played significant roles in decision-making process and interacted with other actors in peatland restoration actions. Community people had only participated in the implementation of rehabilitation actions. In order to sustain community development and sustainable management of RMFR, we suggest to reform multi-stakeholder governance structure that ensures active participation of local community people.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sustainable Forestry
Journal of Sustainable Forestry Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Journal of Sustainable Forestry publishes peer-reviewed, original research on forest science. While the emphasis is on sustainable use of forest products and services, the journal covers a wide range of topics from the underlying biology and ecology of forests to the social, economic and policy aspects of forestry. Short communications and review papers that provide a clear theoretical, conceptual or methodological contribution to the existing literature are also included in the journal. Common topics covered in the Journal of Sustainable Forestry include: • Ecology, management, recreation, restoration and silvicultural systems of all forest types, including urban forests • All aspects of forest biology, including ecophysiology, entomology, pathology, genetics, tree breeding, and biotechnology • Wood properties, forest biomass, bioenergy, and carbon sequestration • Simulation modeling, inventory, quantitative methods, and remote sensing • Environmental pollution, fire and climate change impacts, and adaptation and mitigation in forests • Forest engineering, economics, human dimensions, natural resource policy, and planning Journal of Sustainable Forestry provides an international forum for dialogue between research scientists, forest managers, economists and policy and decision makers who share the common vision of the sustainable use of natural resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信