施莱纳的《卡鲁》,布莱克本的《约翰内斯堡》:对殖民小说的修正;或者,从一个殖民地的故事到“南非”的故事

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
M. Chapman
{"title":"施莱纳的《卡鲁》,布莱克本的《约翰内斯堡》:对殖民小说的修正;或者,从一个殖民地的故事到“南非”的故事","authors":"M. Chapman","doi":"10.4314/EIA.V47I2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Schreiner criticism over the last two decades or so has shown greater interest in her ideas than in her literary imagination. Without setting up ‘silos’ of approach – thought and imagination, after all, are inextricably bound – I revisit the power of the literary imagination in the works of both Olive Schreiner and Douglas Blackburn against a context of contemporaneous ‘colonial fiction’: that is, against a context that accentuates, in contrast, the substance and seriousness of the two novelists on whom I focus. Can these two novelists be seen to chart a shift from the story of a colony to a ‘South African’ story? We may conclude, in any case, that between them Schreiner and Blackburn revisioned the colonial novel \nKeywords: Schreiner, Blackburn, colonial South Africa, fiction, imagination/ideas, then/now","PeriodicalId":41428,"journal":{"name":"ENGLISH IN AFRICA","volume":"47 1","pages":"19-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Schreiner’s Karoo, Blackburn’s Joburg: Revisioning the Colonial Novel; or, From the Story of a Colony to a ‘South African’ Story\",\"authors\":\"M. Chapman\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/EIA.V47I2.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Schreiner criticism over the last two decades or so has shown greater interest in her ideas than in her literary imagination. Without setting up ‘silos’ of approach – thought and imagination, after all, are inextricably bound – I revisit the power of the literary imagination in the works of both Olive Schreiner and Douglas Blackburn against a context of contemporaneous ‘colonial fiction’: that is, against a context that accentuates, in contrast, the substance and seriousness of the two novelists on whom I focus. Can these two novelists be seen to chart a shift from the story of a colony to a ‘South African’ story? We may conclude, in any case, that between them Schreiner and Blackburn revisioned the colonial novel \\nKeywords: Schreiner, Blackburn, colonial South Africa, fiction, imagination/ideas, then/now\",\"PeriodicalId\":41428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ENGLISH IN AFRICA\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"19-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ENGLISH IN AFRICA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/EIA.V47I2.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENGLISH IN AFRICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/EIA.V47I2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

施赖纳在过去二十年左右的批评中,对她的思想比对她的文学想象表现出了更大的兴趣。在没有建立“筒仓”方法的情况下——毕竟,思想和想象力是密不可分的——我在同时代的“殖民小说”背景下,重新审视了奥利弗·施赖纳和道格拉斯·布莱克本作品中文学想象力的力量:也就是说,在一个强调,我关注的两位小说家的实质和严肃性。这两位小说家能描绘出从殖民地故事到“南非”故事的转变吗?无论如何,我们可以得出结论,在他们之间,施赖纳和布莱克本修改了殖民小说关键词:施赖纳,布莱克本,殖民地南非,小说,想象/想法,当时/现在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Schreiner’s Karoo, Blackburn’s Joburg: Revisioning the Colonial Novel; or, From the Story of a Colony to a ‘South African’ Story
Schreiner criticism over the last two decades or so has shown greater interest in her ideas than in her literary imagination. Without setting up ‘silos’ of approach – thought and imagination, after all, are inextricably bound – I revisit the power of the literary imagination in the works of both Olive Schreiner and Douglas Blackburn against a context of contemporaneous ‘colonial fiction’: that is, against a context that accentuates, in contrast, the substance and seriousness of the two novelists on whom I focus. Can these two novelists be seen to chart a shift from the story of a colony to a ‘South African’ story? We may conclude, in any case, that between them Schreiner and Blackburn revisioned the colonial novel Keywords: Schreiner, Blackburn, colonial South Africa, fiction, imagination/ideas, then/now
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ENGLISH IN AFRICA
ENGLISH IN AFRICA LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信