{"title":"威廉·史密斯,《赫里福德的使用:中世纪英国教区仪式的来源》。法纳姆:阿什盖特,2015年。xxxi+830页。150英镑为978 1 4724 1277 5英镑。","authors":"M. Salisbury","doi":"10.1017/S0961137116000127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"about Hildegard of Bingen. Arguably, this chapter encapsulates the volume’s most immediate implications for scholarship beyond the circumscribed study of Hildegard reception, since it crystallises succinctly the differences between the two revivals: while the French resurgence of interest in chant was instigated from a religious vantage point, German scholars were interested primarily in the musical aspects of chant. The monks at Solesmes took as their yardstick the medieval sources of Gregorian chant while Germans such as Franz Xaver Haberl were guided by humanist reworkings, most prominently the Medicean Graduale of 1614. Readers with a general interest in the politics of nineteenth-century chant revivals may be tempted to put down Bain’s book before they reach chapter 3; scholars with an interest in Hildegard, in turn, might be tempted to skip it. However, the chapter is worth close attention and is likely to encourage further, in-depth studies of the nineteenth-century reception of medieval music. Perhaps Bain would have been better served by placing this chapter earlier on in her study, for it undergirds much of her presentation of Hildegard-specific reception and it would be a pity for its insights to go unnoticed. This minor quibble aside, Bain’s study achieves its aim with admirable clarity: it demonstrates with flair that the revival of Hildegard and her music was not instigated in the twentieth century, but is rooted in the nineteenth century. Into the bargain, Bain offers readers rich insight into the cultural milieux in which such processes of reception and revival took place, encouraging further investigation.","PeriodicalId":41539,"journal":{"name":"Plainsong & Medieval Music","volume":"26 1","pages":"74 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0961137116000127","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"William Smith, The Use of Hereford: The Sources of a Medieval English Diocesan Rite. Farnham: Ashgate, 2015. xxxi + 830pp. £150. ISBN 978 1 4724 1277 5.\",\"authors\":\"M. Salisbury\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0961137116000127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"about Hildegard of Bingen. Arguably, this chapter encapsulates the volume’s most immediate implications for scholarship beyond the circumscribed study of Hildegard reception, since it crystallises succinctly the differences between the two revivals: while the French resurgence of interest in chant was instigated from a religious vantage point, German scholars were interested primarily in the musical aspects of chant. The monks at Solesmes took as their yardstick the medieval sources of Gregorian chant while Germans such as Franz Xaver Haberl were guided by humanist reworkings, most prominently the Medicean Graduale of 1614. Readers with a general interest in the politics of nineteenth-century chant revivals may be tempted to put down Bain’s book before they reach chapter 3; scholars with an interest in Hildegard, in turn, might be tempted to skip it. However, the chapter is worth close attention and is likely to encourage further, in-depth studies of the nineteenth-century reception of medieval music. Perhaps Bain would have been better served by placing this chapter earlier on in her study, for it undergirds much of her presentation of Hildegard-specific reception and it would be a pity for its insights to go unnoticed. This minor quibble aside, Bain’s study achieves its aim with admirable clarity: it demonstrates with flair that the revival of Hildegard and her music was not instigated in the twentieth century, but is rooted in the nineteenth century. Into the bargain, Bain offers readers rich insight into the cultural milieux in which such processes of reception and revival took place, encouraging further investigation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plainsong & Medieval Music\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"74 - 77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0961137116000127\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plainsong & Medieval Music\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0961137116000127\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plainsong & Medieval Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0961137116000127","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
William Smith, The Use of Hereford: The Sources of a Medieval English Diocesan Rite. Farnham: Ashgate, 2015. xxxi + 830pp. £150. ISBN 978 1 4724 1277 5.
about Hildegard of Bingen. Arguably, this chapter encapsulates the volume’s most immediate implications for scholarship beyond the circumscribed study of Hildegard reception, since it crystallises succinctly the differences between the two revivals: while the French resurgence of interest in chant was instigated from a religious vantage point, German scholars were interested primarily in the musical aspects of chant. The monks at Solesmes took as their yardstick the medieval sources of Gregorian chant while Germans such as Franz Xaver Haberl were guided by humanist reworkings, most prominently the Medicean Graduale of 1614. Readers with a general interest in the politics of nineteenth-century chant revivals may be tempted to put down Bain’s book before they reach chapter 3; scholars with an interest in Hildegard, in turn, might be tempted to skip it. However, the chapter is worth close attention and is likely to encourage further, in-depth studies of the nineteenth-century reception of medieval music. Perhaps Bain would have been better served by placing this chapter earlier on in her study, for it undergirds much of her presentation of Hildegard-specific reception and it would be a pity for its insights to go unnoticed. This minor quibble aside, Bain’s study achieves its aim with admirable clarity: it demonstrates with flair that the revival of Hildegard and her music was not instigated in the twentieth century, but is rooted in the nineteenth century. Into the bargain, Bain offers readers rich insight into the cultural milieux in which such processes of reception and revival took place, encouraging further investigation.
期刊介绍:
Plainsong & Medieval Music is published twice a year in association with the Plainsong and Medieval Music Society and Cantus Planus, study group of the International Musicological Society. It covers the entire spectrum of medieval music: Eastern and Western chant, secular lyric, music theory, palaeography, performance practice, and medieval polyphony, both sacred and secular, as well as the history of musical institutions. The chronological scope of the journal extends from late antiquity to the early Renaissance and to the present day in the case of chant. In addition to book reviews in each issue, a comprehensive bibliography of chant research and a discography of recent and re-issued plainchant recordings appear annually.