头孢唑林在青霉素过敏整形外科患者围手术期预防中的安全性:回顾性图表回顾

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Plastic surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-07 DOI:10.1177/22925503231190929
Ruizhi Dong, Kasey Lanier, Casey Kraft, Roman Skoracki, Craig Lehrman, Monica Kraft
{"title":"头孢唑林在青霉素过敏整形外科患者围手术期预防中的安全性:回顾性图表回顾","authors":"Ruizhi Dong, Kasey Lanier, Casey Kraft, Roman Skoracki, Craig Lehrman, Monica Kraft","doi":"10.1177/22925503231190929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Antimicrobial prophylaxis is crucial in reducing surgical site infections (SSIs). First-generation cephalosporins are commonly first line, but issues arise when patients report a penicillin allergy. Although up to 10% of Americans report a penicillin allergy, up to 95% are not truly allergic. Even patients with true penicillin allergy likely tolerate cephalosporins due to low cross-reactivity. Nevertheless, providers are less likely to prescribe cefazolin for these patients, increasing the risk of SSI. We seek to characterize the pattern of perioperative antibiotic use and rate of reaction in plastic surgery patients who endorse a penicillin allergy. <b>Method:</b> This was a single-center retrospective chart review of adults who received body contouring plastic surgery from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021. The presence of reported penicillin allergy and administration of cefazolin versus alternative agent were evaluated, and the outcome was measured in number of anaphylactic reactions and SSI events. <b>Results:</b> The study included 457 patients in total; 437 (96%) were female; 106 (23%) had listed allergy to penicillin, cephalosporin, or both - 17 (16%) were listed as having anaphylaxis to penicillin, 62 (58.5%) endorsed a nonanaphylactic allergic reaction to penicillin, 8 (7.5%) endorsed an allergy without a documented reaction to penicillin, and 19 (18%) reported a prior cephalosporin allergy. All patients with a beta-lactam allergy who received cefazolin perioperatively did not have any anaphylaxis events. Three patients who received clindamycin and 1 patient who received cefazolin developed SSI postoperatively. <b>Conclusion:</b> Cephalosporins should be the first line for appropriate patients with a penicillin allergy, as alternative agents have increased SSI risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"159-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770715/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of Cefazolin Perioperative Prophylaxis in Plastic Surgery Patients With Penicillin Allergy: A Retrospective Chart Review.\",\"authors\":\"Ruizhi Dong, Kasey Lanier, Casey Kraft, Roman Skoracki, Craig Lehrman, Monica Kraft\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/22925503231190929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Antimicrobial prophylaxis is crucial in reducing surgical site infections (SSIs). First-generation cephalosporins are commonly first line, but issues arise when patients report a penicillin allergy. Although up to 10% of Americans report a penicillin allergy, up to 95% are not truly allergic. Even patients with true penicillin allergy likely tolerate cephalosporins due to low cross-reactivity. Nevertheless, providers are less likely to prescribe cefazolin for these patients, increasing the risk of SSI. We seek to characterize the pattern of perioperative antibiotic use and rate of reaction in plastic surgery patients who endorse a penicillin allergy. <b>Method:</b> This was a single-center retrospective chart review of adults who received body contouring plastic surgery from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021. The presence of reported penicillin allergy and administration of cefazolin versus alternative agent were evaluated, and the outcome was measured in number of anaphylactic reactions and SSI events. <b>Results:</b> The study included 457 patients in total; 437 (96%) were female; 106 (23%) had listed allergy to penicillin, cephalosporin, or both - 17 (16%) were listed as having anaphylaxis to penicillin, 62 (58.5%) endorsed a nonanaphylactic allergic reaction to penicillin, 8 (7.5%) endorsed an allergy without a documented reaction to penicillin, and 19 (18%) reported a prior cephalosporin allergy. All patients with a beta-lactam allergy who received cefazolin perioperatively did not have any anaphylaxis events. Three patients who received clindamycin and 1 patient who received cefazolin developed SSI postoperatively. <b>Conclusion:</b> Cephalosporins should be the first line for appropriate patients with a penicillin allergy, as alternative agents have increased SSI risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"159-163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770715/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503231190929\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503231190929","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗菌素预防是减少手术部位感染(ssi)的关键。第一代头孢菌素通常是一线药物,但当患者报告青霉素过敏时,问题就出现了。尽管高达10%的美国人报告对青霉素过敏,但高达95%的人并不真正过敏。由于交叉反应性低,即使是真正的青霉素过敏患者也可能耐受头孢菌素。然而,提供者不太可能为这些患者开头孢唑林,增加了SSI的风险。我们试图描述围手术期抗生素使用的模式和反应率在整形手术患者谁支持青霉素过敏。方法:这是一项单中心回顾性图表综述,研究对象为2021年1月1日至2021年12月31日接受身体轮廓整形手术的成年人。评估报告的青霉素过敏和头孢唑林与替代药物的使用情况,并以过敏反应和SSI事件的数量来衡量结果。结果:共纳入457例患者;女性437例(96%);106人(23%)对青霉素、头孢菌素或两者均有过敏反应,17人(16%)对青霉素有过敏反应,62人(58.5%)对青霉素有非过敏性过敏反应,8人(7.5%)对青霉素无过敏反应,19人(18%)报告有头孢菌素过敏史。所有β -内酰胺过敏患者围手术期接受头孢唑林治疗均未发生任何过敏反应事件。克林霉素组3例,头孢唑林组1例,术后发生SSI。结论:对于青霉素过敏的患者,应首选头孢菌素,因为替代药物会增加SSI的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety of Cefazolin Perioperative Prophylaxis in Plastic Surgery Patients With Penicillin Allergy: A Retrospective Chart Review.

Introduction: Antimicrobial prophylaxis is crucial in reducing surgical site infections (SSIs). First-generation cephalosporins are commonly first line, but issues arise when patients report a penicillin allergy. Although up to 10% of Americans report a penicillin allergy, up to 95% are not truly allergic. Even patients with true penicillin allergy likely tolerate cephalosporins due to low cross-reactivity. Nevertheless, providers are less likely to prescribe cefazolin for these patients, increasing the risk of SSI. We seek to characterize the pattern of perioperative antibiotic use and rate of reaction in plastic surgery patients who endorse a penicillin allergy. Method: This was a single-center retrospective chart review of adults who received body contouring plastic surgery from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021. The presence of reported penicillin allergy and administration of cefazolin versus alternative agent were evaluated, and the outcome was measured in number of anaphylactic reactions and SSI events. Results: The study included 457 patients in total; 437 (96%) were female; 106 (23%) had listed allergy to penicillin, cephalosporin, or both - 17 (16%) were listed as having anaphylaxis to penicillin, 62 (58.5%) endorsed a nonanaphylactic allergic reaction to penicillin, 8 (7.5%) endorsed an allergy without a documented reaction to penicillin, and 19 (18%) reported a prior cephalosporin allergy. All patients with a beta-lactam allergy who received cefazolin perioperatively did not have any anaphylaxis events. Three patients who received clindamycin and 1 patient who received cefazolin developed SSI postoperatively. Conclusion: Cephalosporins should be the first line for appropriate patients with a penicillin allergy, as alternative agents have increased SSI risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plastic surgery
Plastic surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Plastic Surgery (Chirurgie Plastique) is the official journal of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Group for the Advancement of Microsurgery, and the Canadian Society for Surgery of the Hand. It serves as a major venue for Canadian research, society guidelines, and continuing medical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信