历史上的税收:承认(庆祝)?后悔?)第六部分六十年

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW
Intertax Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.54648/taxi2023042
J. Fleming
{"title":"历史上的税收:承认(庆祝)?后悔?)第六部分六十年","authors":"J. Fleming","doi":"10.54648/taxi2023042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deferral of home-country tax on the income of foreign subsidiary corporations produces the twin evils of business and investment location distortion and profit shifting. In 1961, the Kennedy administration proposed the almost complete elimination of this type of deferral from the US income tax system. Because of strong opposition lobbying, the result was a political compromise commonly known as Subpart F. This article explains why Subpart F was largely a failure, in spite of its being copied to various degrees by the controlled foreign corporation (CFC) regimes of many developed countries. The article also explores the extent to which the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) has, or has not, cured Subpart F’s failure to effectively address location distortion and profit shifting.\nDeferral, profit shifting, Subpart F, CFC regimes, US international income taxation, 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act","PeriodicalId":45365,"journal":{"name":"Intertax","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tax In History: Acknowledging (Celebrating? Regretting?) Sixty Years of Subpart F\",\"authors\":\"J. Fleming\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/taxi2023042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Deferral of home-country tax on the income of foreign subsidiary corporations produces the twin evils of business and investment location distortion and profit shifting. In 1961, the Kennedy administration proposed the almost complete elimination of this type of deferral from the US income tax system. Because of strong opposition lobbying, the result was a political compromise commonly known as Subpart F. This article explains why Subpart F was largely a failure, in spite of its being copied to various degrees by the controlled foreign corporation (CFC) regimes of many developed countries. The article also explores the extent to which the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) has, or has not, cured Subpart F’s failure to effectively address location distortion and profit shifting.\\nDeferral, profit shifting, Subpart F, CFC regimes, US international income taxation, 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act\",\"PeriodicalId\":45365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intertax\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intertax\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2023042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intertax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2023042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国外子公司所得税的延后征收产生了经营投资区位扭曲和利润转移的双重弊端。1961年,肯尼迪政府提议几乎完全取消美国所得税体系中的这种递延。由于强大的反对游说,结果是一种政治妥协,通常被称为子部分F。本文解释了为什么子部分F在很大程度上是失败的,尽管它被许多发达国家的受控外国公司(CFC)制度在不同程度上复制。本文还探讨了2017年减税和就业法案(TCJA)在多大程度上解决了F子部分未能有效解决位置扭曲和利润转移的问题。递延,利润转移,F部分,CFC制度,美国国际所得税,2017年减税和就业法案
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tax In History: Acknowledging (Celebrating? Regretting?) Sixty Years of Subpart F
Deferral of home-country tax on the income of foreign subsidiary corporations produces the twin evils of business and investment location distortion and profit shifting. In 1961, the Kennedy administration proposed the almost complete elimination of this type of deferral from the US income tax system. Because of strong opposition lobbying, the result was a political compromise commonly known as Subpart F. This article explains why Subpart F was largely a failure, in spite of its being copied to various degrees by the controlled foreign corporation (CFC) regimes of many developed countries. The article also explores the extent to which the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) has, or has not, cured Subpart F’s failure to effectively address location distortion and profit shifting. Deferral, profit shifting, Subpart F, CFC regimes, US international income taxation, 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intertax
Intertax LAW-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
50.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信