英国对2014-2018年“伊斯兰国”恐怖组织袭击的回应

IF 0.3 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Dewi Juita
{"title":"英国对2014-2018年“伊斯兰国”恐怖组织袭击的回应","authors":"Dewi Juita","doi":"10.20473/MKP.V34I12021.93-107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advancements in technology, information, and communication have transformed warfare from a conventional method to psychological warfare (psywar). In the past, warfare was heavily associated with various weapons, such as rifles, bombs, or even nuclear power, to attack an area for specific purposes. In the modern era, warfare is more concerned about technology and information superiority to threaten the enemy faster and more robust. Modern warfare targets the psychology of society in order to win the war. Islamic State (IS) has attracted the world’s attention for its successful strategy in using Twitter in waging war on a country, in this case, the United Kingdom. The purpose of this research is to describe the United Kingdom government’s response in fighting Islamic State attacks on Twitter. This research uses descriptive methods by collecting data from books, the internet, journals, and scientific articles. This study indicates that the United Kingdom responds to Islamic State attacks through two patterns, hard and soft power. The hard power method is carried out through intelligence, police, and economic power to collaborate with international organizations such as the United Nations. The soft power pattern was implemented by creating official state Twitter accounts such as @ UKAgainstDaesh, @coalition, @TerrorismPolice, and collaboration with the Global Internet Forum CounterTerrorism (GIFCT). This strategy plays an essential role in stopping the spread of online terrorism-related content online by blocking related photos, videos, and texts of terrorism.","PeriodicalId":55930,"journal":{"name":"Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik","volume":"34 1","pages":"93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The United Kingdom’s response to the 2014-2018 Islamic State Terrorist Group attacks\",\"authors\":\"Dewi Juita\",\"doi\":\"10.20473/MKP.V34I12021.93-107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Advancements in technology, information, and communication have transformed warfare from a conventional method to psychological warfare (psywar). In the past, warfare was heavily associated with various weapons, such as rifles, bombs, or even nuclear power, to attack an area for specific purposes. In the modern era, warfare is more concerned about technology and information superiority to threaten the enemy faster and more robust. Modern warfare targets the psychology of society in order to win the war. Islamic State (IS) has attracted the world’s attention for its successful strategy in using Twitter in waging war on a country, in this case, the United Kingdom. The purpose of this research is to describe the United Kingdom government’s response in fighting Islamic State attacks on Twitter. This research uses descriptive methods by collecting data from books, the internet, journals, and scientific articles. This study indicates that the United Kingdom responds to Islamic State attacks through two patterns, hard and soft power. The hard power method is carried out through intelligence, police, and economic power to collaborate with international organizations such as the United Nations. The soft power pattern was implemented by creating official state Twitter accounts such as @ UKAgainstDaesh, @coalition, @TerrorismPolice, and collaboration with the Global Internet Forum CounterTerrorism (GIFCT). This strategy plays an essential role in stopping the spread of online terrorism-related content online by blocking related photos, videos, and texts of terrorism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20473/MKP.V34I12021.93-107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/MKP.V34I12021.93-107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

技术、信息和通信的进步已经将战争从传统方法转变为心理战。在过去,战争与各种武器密切相关,如步枪、炸弹,甚至核能,以攻击特定目的的地区。在现代战争中,战争更关注技术和信息优势,以更快、更强大的速度威胁敌人。现代战争的目标是社会心理,以赢得战争。伊斯兰国(IS)因其成功利用推特对一个国家发动战争的战略而吸引了全世界的关注,在本例中,就是英国。这项研究的目的是描述英国政府在打击伊斯兰国在推特上的攻击时的反应。本研究采用描述性方法,从书籍、互联网、期刊和科学文章中收集数据。这项研究表明,英国通过硬实力和软实力两种模式应对伊斯兰国的袭击。硬实力方法是通过情报、警察和经济力量与联合国等国际组织合作来实现的。软实力模式是通过创建@UKAgainstDaesh、@coalition、@TerroristPolice等官方国家推特账户,并与全球互联网反恐论坛(GIFCT)合作来实现的。这一策略通过屏蔽恐怖主义的相关照片、视频和文本,在阻止网上恐怖主义相关内容的传播方面发挥着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The United Kingdom’s response to the 2014-2018 Islamic State Terrorist Group attacks
Advancements in technology, information, and communication have transformed warfare from a conventional method to psychological warfare (psywar). In the past, warfare was heavily associated with various weapons, such as rifles, bombs, or even nuclear power, to attack an area for specific purposes. In the modern era, warfare is more concerned about technology and information superiority to threaten the enemy faster and more robust. Modern warfare targets the psychology of society in order to win the war. Islamic State (IS) has attracted the world’s attention for its successful strategy in using Twitter in waging war on a country, in this case, the United Kingdom. The purpose of this research is to describe the United Kingdom government’s response in fighting Islamic State attacks on Twitter. This research uses descriptive methods by collecting data from books, the internet, journals, and scientific articles. This study indicates that the United Kingdom responds to Islamic State attacks through two patterns, hard and soft power. The hard power method is carried out through intelligence, police, and economic power to collaborate with international organizations such as the United Nations. The soft power pattern was implemented by creating official state Twitter accounts such as @ UKAgainstDaesh, @coalition, @TerrorismPolice, and collaboration with the Global Internet Forum CounterTerrorism (GIFCT). This strategy plays an essential role in stopping the spread of online terrorism-related content online by blocking related photos, videos, and texts of terrorism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik
Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信