Flavell, Beach和Chinsky(1966)的多实验室直接复制:记忆任务中的自发言语排练作为年龄的函数

IF 15.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY
E. Elliott, C. Morey, Angela M. AuBuchon, N. Cowan, C. Jarrold, Eryn J. Adams, M. Attwood, Büşra Bayram, Stefen Beeler-Duden, Taran Y. Blakstvedt, G. Büttner, T. Castelain, Shari Cave, D. Crepaldi, E. Fredriksen, Bret A. Glass, Andrew J. Graves, D. Guitard, S. Hoehl, Alexis Hosch, Stephanie Jeanneret, Tanya N Joseph, Christopher Koch, J. Lelonkiewicz, G. Lupyan, A. McDonald, Grace Meissner, W. Mendenhall, D. Moreau, T. Ostermann, A. Özdoğru, Francesca Padovani, S. Poloczek, J. P. Röer, Christina C. Schonberg, C. K. Tamnes, M. Tomasik, B. Valentini, Evie Vergauwe, Haley A. Vlach, M. Voracek
{"title":"Flavell, Beach和Chinsky(1966)的多实验室直接复制:记忆任务中的自发言语排练作为年龄的函数","authors":"E. Elliott, C. Morey, Angela M. AuBuchon, N. Cowan, C. Jarrold, Eryn J. Adams, M. Attwood, Büşra Bayram, Stefen Beeler-Duden, Taran Y. Blakstvedt, G. Büttner, T. Castelain, Shari Cave, D. Crepaldi, E. Fredriksen, Bret A. Glass, Andrew J. Graves, D. Guitard, S. Hoehl, Alexis Hosch, Stephanie Jeanneret, Tanya N Joseph, Christopher Koch, J. Lelonkiewicz, G. Lupyan, A. McDonald, Grace Meissner, W. Mendenhall, D. Moreau, T. Ostermann, A. Özdoğru, Francesca Padovani, S. Poloczek, J. P. Röer, Christina C. Schonberg, C. K. Tamnes, M. Tomasik, B. Valentini, Evie Vergauwe, Haley A. Vlach, M. Voracek","doi":"10.1177/25152459211018187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Work by Flavell, Beach, and Chinsky indicated a change in the spontaneous production of overt verbalization behaviors when comparing young children (age 5) with older children (age 10). Despite the critical role that this evidence of a change in verbalization behaviors plays in modern theories of cognitive development and working memory, there has been only one other published near replication of this work. In this Registered Replication Report, we relied on researchers from 17 labs who contributed their results to a larger and more comprehensive sample of children. We assessed memory performance and the presence or absence of verbalization behaviors of young children at different ages and determined that the original pattern of findings was largely upheld: Older children were more likely to verbalize, and their memory spans improved. We confirmed that 5- and 6-year-old children who verbalized recalled more than children who did not verbalize. However, unlike Flavell et al., substantial proportions of our 5- and 6-year-old samples overtly verbalized at least sometimes during the picture memory task. In addition, continuous increase in overt verbalization from 7 to 10 years old was not consistently evident in our samples. These robust findings should be weighed when considering theories of cognitive development, particularly theories concerning when verbal rehearsal emerges and relations between speech and memory.","PeriodicalId":55645,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/25152459211018187","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multilab Direct Replication of Flavell, Beach, and Chinsky (1966): Spontaneous Verbal Rehearsal in a Memory Task as a Function of Age\",\"authors\":\"E. Elliott, C. Morey, Angela M. AuBuchon, N. Cowan, C. Jarrold, Eryn J. Adams, M. Attwood, Büşra Bayram, Stefen Beeler-Duden, Taran Y. Blakstvedt, G. Büttner, T. Castelain, Shari Cave, D. Crepaldi, E. Fredriksen, Bret A. Glass, Andrew J. Graves, D. Guitard, S. Hoehl, Alexis Hosch, Stephanie Jeanneret, Tanya N Joseph, Christopher Koch, J. Lelonkiewicz, G. Lupyan, A. McDonald, Grace Meissner, W. Mendenhall, D. Moreau, T. Ostermann, A. Özdoğru, Francesca Padovani, S. Poloczek, J. P. Röer, Christina C. Schonberg, C. K. Tamnes, M. Tomasik, B. Valentini, Evie Vergauwe, Haley A. Vlach, M. Voracek\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/25152459211018187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Work by Flavell, Beach, and Chinsky indicated a change in the spontaneous production of overt verbalization behaviors when comparing young children (age 5) with older children (age 10). Despite the critical role that this evidence of a change in verbalization behaviors plays in modern theories of cognitive development and working memory, there has been only one other published near replication of this work. In this Registered Replication Report, we relied on researchers from 17 labs who contributed their results to a larger and more comprehensive sample of children. We assessed memory performance and the presence or absence of verbalization behaviors of young children at different ages and determined that the original pattern of findings was largely upheld: Older children were more likely to verbalize, and their memory spans improved. We confirmed that 5- and 6-year-old children who verbalized recalled more than children who did not verbalize. However, unlike Flavell et al., substantial proportions of our 5- and 6-year-old samples overtly verbalized at least sometimes during the picture memory task. In addition, continuous increase in overt verbalization from 7 to 10 years old was not consistently evident in our samples. These robust findings should be weighed when considering theories of cognitive development, particularly theories concerning when verbal rehearsal emerges and relations between speech and memory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/25152459211018187\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211018187\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211018187","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

Flavell、Beach和Chinsky的研究表明,在比较幼儿(5岁)和年长儿童(10岁)时,明显言语行为的自发产生发生了变化。尽管这一言语行为变化的证据在现代认知发展和工作记忆理论中发挥着关键作用,但只有一篇发表的论文接近于复制这项工作。在这份注册复制报告中,我们依赖于来自17个实验室的研究人员,他们将自己的结果贡献给了更大、更全面的儿童样本。我们评估了不同年龄幼儿的记忆表现和言语行为的存在与否,并确定最初的发现模式在很大程度上得到了支持:年龄较大的儿童更有可能言语,他们的记忆广度也有所提高。我们证实,5岁和6岁的用言语表达的儿童比不用言语的儿童回忆得更多。然而,与Flavell等人不同的是,我们5岁和6岁的样本中有相当一部分在图片记忆任务中公开表达,至少有时是这样。此外,在我们的样本中,从7岁到10岁,显性言语的持续增加并不总是明显的。在考虑认知发展理论时,应该权衡这些有力的发现,特别是关于言语排练何时出现以及言语和记忆之间关系的理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multilab Direct Replication of Flavell, Beach, and Chinsky (1966): Spontaneous Verbal Rehearsal in a Memory Task as a Function of Age
Work by Flavell, Beach, and Chinsky indicated a change in the spontaneous production of overt verbalization behaviors when comparing young children (age 5) with older children (age 10). Despite the critical role that this evidence of a change in verbalization behaviors plays in modern theories of cognitive development and working memory, there has been only one other published near replication of this work. In this Registered Replication Report, we relied on researchers from 17 labs who contributed their results to a larger and more comprehensive sample of children. We assessed memory performance and the presence or absence of verbalization behaviors of young children at different ages and determined that the original pattern of findings was largely upheld: Older children were more likely to verbalize, and their memory spans improved. We confirmed that 5- and 6-year-old children who verbalized recalled more than children who did not verbalize. However, unlike Flavell et al., substantial proportions of our 5- and 6-year-old samples overtly verbalized at least sometimes during the picture memory task. In addition, continuous increase in overt verbalization from 7 to 10 years old was not consistently evident in our samples. These robust findings should be weighed when considering theories of cognitive development, particularly theories concerning when verbal rehearsal emerges and relations between speech and memory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
0.70%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: In 2021, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science will undergo a transition to become an open access journal. This journal focuses on publishing innovative developments in research methods, practices, and conduct within the field of psychological science. It embraces a wide range of areas and topics and encourages the integration of methodological and analytical questions. The aim of AMPPS is to bring the latest methodological advances to researchers from various disciplines, even those who are not methodological experts. Therefore, the journal seeks submissions that are accessible to readers with different research interests and that represent the diverse research trends within the field of psychological science. The types of content that AMPPS welcomes include articles that communicate advancements in methods, practices, and metascience, as well as empirical scientific best practices. Additionally, tutorials, commentaries, and simulation studies on new techniques and research tools are encouraged. The journal also aims to publish papers that bring advances from specialized subfields to a broader audience. Lastly, AMPPS accepts Registered Replication Reports, which focus on replicating important findings from previously published studies. Overall, the transition of Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science to an open access journal aims to increase accessibility and promote the dissemination of new developments in research methods and practices within the field of psychological science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信