中国背景下的企业环境报告:利益相关者突出、社会主义意识形态和国家权力的相互作用

IF 5.5 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Wei Qian , Lee Parker , Jingyu Zhu
{"title":"中国背景下的企业环境报告:利益相关者突出、社会主义意识形态和国家权力的相互作用","authors":"Wei Qian ,&nbsp;Lee Parker ,&nbsp;Jingyu Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2023.101198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Research considers that the increase in corporate environmental reporting over the past decades has been a response to stakeholder demand and pressure within and beyond the boundaries of business operations. Recent empirical studies have begun to extrapolate the stakeholder concept and rationale into developing countries when explaining their growing reporting practices. However, how this global trend is played out in the particular institutional developing country context remains unanswered. This research addresses the issue by employing a case study of a leading mining company in China. The study finds that corporate managers do understand the importance of stakeholder communication and engagement. Such importance has been framed into national social obligations within the socialist ideology long embedded and more recently reinforced in the minds of managers. It reveals an imprinting process of ideological prioritisation through which imprinted socialist philosophies and values are entrenched in perceived stakeholder salience and responsibility for environmental reporting. This process is decoupled from delivering procedural compliance via accountability reporting because of the dominance of State power and national collective interests over individual rights. This study suggests that socially and politically embedded philosophies and ideology ingrained in a country can create another layer of criteria when managers interpret and determine the salience of individual stakeholders and make reporting decisions. It highlights that the extent to which the salience of stakeholders is understood and responded to in the environmental reporting process is conditioned by the structure and operation of a country's political and social system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47996,"journal":{"name":"British Accounting Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate environmental reporting in the China context: The interplay of stakeholder salience, socialist ideology and state power\",\"authors\":\"Wei Qian ,&nbsp;Lee Parker ,&nbsp;Jingyu Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bar.2023.101198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Research considers that the increase in corporate environmental reporting over the past decades has been a response to stakeholder demand and pressure within and beyond the boundaries of business operations. Recent empirical studies have begun to extrapolate the stakeholder concept and rationale into developing countries when explaining their growing reporting practices. However, how this global trend is played out in the particular institutional developing country context remains unanswered. This research addresses the issue by employing a case study of a leading mining company in China. The study finds that corporate managers do understand the importance of stakeholder communication and engagement. Such importance has been framed into national social obligations within the socialist ideology long embedded and more recently reinforced in the minds of managers. It reveals an imprinting process of ideological prioritisation through which imprinted socialist philosophies and values are entrenched in perceived stakeholder salience and responsibility for environmental reporting. This process is decoupled from delivering procedural compliance via accountability reporting because of the dominance of State power and national collective interests over individual rights. This study suggests that socially and politically embedded philosophies and ideology ingrained in a country can create another layer of criteria when managers interpret and determine the salience of individual stakeholders and make reporting decisions. It highlights that the extent to which the salience of stakeholders is understood and responded to in the environmental reporting process is conditioned by the structure and operation of a country's political and social system.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Accounting Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Accounting Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838923000318\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838923000318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究认为,在过去几十年里,企业环境报告的增加是对利益相关者在企业运营范围内外的需求和压力的回应。最近的实证研究已开始将利益相关者的概念和原理推广到发展中国家,以解释其不断增长的报告实践。然而,这一全球趋势如何在发展中国家的特殊制度背景下得到体现,仍是一个未解之谜。本研究通过对中国一家领先矿业公司的案例研究来解决这一问题。研究发现,企业管理者确实了解利益相关者沟通和参与的重要性。这种重要性在社会主义意识形态中被定格为国家的社会义务,并在管理者的思想中长期根深蒂固,最近又得到加强。它揭示了一个意识形态优先化的烙印过程,通过这个过程,社会主义哲学和价值观的烙印在利益相关者对环境报告的认知和责任中根深蒂固。由于国家权力和国家集体利益凌驾于个人权利之上,这一过程与通过问责报告实现程序合规脱钩。这项研究表明,一个国家根深蒂固的社会和政治哲学及意识形态,会在管理者解释和确定单个利益相关者的显著性并做出报告决策时,产生另一层标准。本研究强调,在环境报告过程中,利益相关者的显著性在多大程度上得到理解和回应,取决于一个国家的政治和社会制度的结构和运作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Corporate environmental reporting in the China context: The interplay of stakeholder salience, socialist ideology and state power

Research considers that the increase in corporate environmental reporting over the past decades has been a response to stakeholder demand and pressure within and beyond the boundaries of business operations. Recent empirical studies have begun to extrapolate the stakeholder concept and rationale into developing countries when explaining their growing reporting practices. However, how this global trend is played out in the particular institutional developing country context remains unanswered. This research addresses the issue by employing a case study of a leading mining company in China. The study finds that corporate managers do understand the importance of stakeholder communication and engagement. Such importance has been framed into national social obligations within the socialist ideology long embedded and more recently reinforced in the minds of managers. It reveals an imprinting process of ideological prioritisation through which imprinted socialist philosophies and values are entrenched in perceived stakeholder salience and responsibility for environmental reporting. This process is decoupled from delivering procedural compliance via accountability reporting because of the dominance of State power and national collective interests over individual rights. This study suggests that socially and politically embedded philosophies and ideology ingrained in a country can create another layer of criteria when managers interpret and determine the salience of individual stakeholders and make reporting decisions. It highlights that the extent to which the salience of stakeholders is understood and responded to in the environmental reporting process is conditioned by the structure and operation of a country's political and social system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Accounting Review
British Accounting Review BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
39
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: The British Accounting Review*is pleased to publish original scholarly papers across the whole spectrum of accounting and finance. The journal is eclectic and pluralistic and contributions are welcomed across a wide range of research methodologies (e.g. analytical, archival, experimental, survey and qualitative case methods) and topics (e.g. financial accounting, management accounting, finance and financial management, auditing, public sector accounting, social and environmental accounting; accounting education and accounting history), evidence from UK and non-UK sources are equally acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信