{"title":"火人考古:黑石城的兴衰","authors":"J. Oliver","doi":"10.1080/00293652.2022.2076609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For ten months of the year the Black Rock Desert of northwestern Nevada is one of the emptiest spaces in the American West. Between August and October, the silence and vastness of the playa is interrupted by what could be described as a wonder of the modern world: the raising, occupation, and disassembling of Black Rock City; quite possibly the largest seasonally inhabited settlement in the Americas. In the space of a few short weeks, survey teams, machines, shipping containers and porta-potties invade the ‘smooth space’ of this one-time ancient lakebed and transform it into a vast city: ‘striated space’ in the shape of a giant clock, but with the built space forming a semicircle reminiscent of a giant horseshoe. Concentric and radial streets (the latter named for the hours of the day) form city blocks while public plazas punctuate the length and breadth of its great arc. With its infrastructure established the city is ready to meet its festival goers, ‘Burners’, who arrive on mass in a convoy of pickup trucks for the week-long event (in 2019 there were more than 75,000 people). The planned city blocks are then filled by a myriad of camps and provisioning centres. The empty space at the geographic heart of the city forms a grand public plaza and is set aside for Black Rock City’s most famous resident: the ‘Man’, a giant humanoid effigy who will be set ablaze at the festival’s zenith. The ‘burn’ and the carefree expression and chaos that surround it, signifies the climax of the festival, which takes place on a Saturday night. By Monday morning, the entire city will begin to be disassembled. The complex choreography that erected the city is put into reverse. By the middle of October, the city has disappeared and the silence and vastness of the Black Rock Desert returns. The media friendly image of Black Rock city focuses on the immolation of the Man and the spectacle that surround it. But as Carolyn L. White argues in The Archaeology of Burning Man, Black Rock City is much more than the setting for America’s most celebrated summer festival. The contours and temporalities of its urban fabric provide the medium for one of the most ambitious experiments in ‘active site’ archaeology since leading lights in contemporary archaeology came up with the concept earlier this century. What is active site archaeology? If contemporary archaeology is about understanding the very recent past – usually aspects of daily life that we take for granted, but which often go undocumented – active site archaeology puts this into the context of places that are still inhabited and used by people today. This is more than just the study of a lived-in urban setting. As White explains, unlike most archaeology projects, which study abandoned sites, ancient or modern, given that ‘it exists for one week a year, every year’, it ‘provides an accelerated example of the kinds of structures and social situations that people create for themselves’ when they come together, voluntarily, within a time-limited, dense urban setting. Within this wider context, a range of other questions provide the book with direction and structure. How do people live in this city? What are the material signatures of the lives of Burners? How do people set up expedient spaces? And what is important in those spaces? Six meaty chapters take us on an ethnographic tour – what others have termed ‘archaeoethnography’ (Harrison and Schofield 2010, p. 91) – of the materiality and spatiality of Black Rock City by following its cycles of building, occupation, and dismantling. White is influenced by Binfordian ethnoarchaeology and its characteristically detailed","PeriodicalId":45030,"journal":{"name":"Norwegian Archaeological Review","volume":"55 1","pages":"188 - 191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Archaeology of Burning Man. The Rise and Fall of Black Rock City\",\"authors\":\"J. Oliver\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00293652.2022.2076609\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For ten months of the year the Black Rock Desert of northwestern Nevada is one of the emptiest spaces in the American West. Between August and October, the silence and vastness of the playa is interrupted by what could be described as a wonder of the modern world: the raising, occupation, and disassembling of Black Rock City; quite possibly the largest seasonally inhabited settlement in the Americas. In the space of a few short weeks, survey teams, machines, shipping containers and porta-potties invade the ‘smooth space’ of this one-time ancient lakebed and transform it into a vast city: ‘striated space’ in the shape of a giant clock, but with the built space forming a semicircle reminiscent of a giant horseshoe. Concentric and radial streets (the latter named for the hours of the day) form city blocks while public plazas punctuate the length and breadth of its great arc. With its infrastructure established the city is ready to meet its festival goers, ‘Burners’, who arrive on mass in a convoy of pickup trucks for the week-long event (in 2019 there were more than 75,000 people). The planned city blocks are then filled by a myriad of camps and provisioning centres. The empty space at the geographic heart of the city forms a grand public plaza and is set aside for Black Rock City’s most famous resident: the ‘Man’, a giant humanoid effigy who will be set ablaze at the festival’s zenith. The ‘burn’ and the carefree expression and chaos that surround it, signifies the climax of the festival, which takes place on a Saturday night. By Monday morning, the entire city will begin to be disassembled. The complex choreography that erected the city is put into reverse. By the middle of October, the city has disappeared and the silence and vastness of the Black Rock Desert returns. The media friendly image of Black Rock city focuses on the immolation of the Man and the spectacle that surround it. But as Carolyn L. White argues in The Archaeology of Burning Man, Black Rock City is much more than the setting for America’s most celebrated summer festival. The contours and temporalities of its urban fabric provide the medium for one of the most ambitious experiments in ‘active site’ archaeology since leading lights in contemporary archaeology came up with the concept earlier this century. What is active site archaeology? If contemporary archaeology is about understanding the very recent past – usually aspects of daily life that we take for granted, but which often go undocumented – active site archaeology puts this into the context of places that are still inhabited and used by people today. This is more than just the study of a lived-in urban setting. As White explains, unlike most archaeology projects, which study abandoned sites, ancient or modern, given that ‘it exists for one week a year, every year’, it ‘provides an accelerated example of the kinds of structures and social situations that people create for themselves’ when they come together, voluntarily, within a time-limited, dense urban setting. Within this wider context, a range of other questions provide the book with direction and structure. How do people live in this city? What are the material signatures of the lives of Burners? How do people set up expedient spaces? And what is important in those spaces? Six meaty chapters take us on an ethnographic tour – what others have termed ‘archaeoethnography’ (Harrison and Schofield 2010, p. 91) – of the materiality and spatiality of Black Rock City by following its cycles of building, occupation, and dismantling. White is influenced by Binfordian ethnoarchaeology and its characteristically detailed\",\"PeriodicalId\":45030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Norwegian Archaeological Review\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"188 - 191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Norwegian Archaeological Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2022.2076609\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Norwegian Archaeological Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2022.2076609","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
一年中有十个月,内华达州西北部的黑岩沙漠是美国西部最空旷的地方之一。从8月到10月,playa的寂静和广阔被一件可以被描述为现代世界奇迹的事情所打破:黑石城的崛起、占领和解体;很可能是美洲最大的季节性居住地。在短短几周的时间里,勘测团队、机器、集装箱和移动厕所侵入了这个曾经古老的湖床的“平滑空间”,并将其转变为一个巨大的城市:一个巨大时钟形状的“条纹空间”,但建筑空间形成了一个半圆形,让人想起一个巨大的马蹄铁。同心和放射状街道(后者以一天中的小时命名)形成了城市街区,而公共广场则点缀着它的大弧线的长度和宽度。随着基础设施的建立,这座城市已经准备好迎接节日的观众,“燃烧者”,他们乘坐皮卡车队来到这里,参加为期一周的活动(2019年有超过75000人)。然后,规划好的城市街区被无数的营地和补给中心填满。城市中心的空地形成了一个巨大的公共广场,留给黑石城最著名的居民:“人”,一个巨大的人形雕像,将在节日的顶峰被点燃。“燃烧”以及围绕它的无忧无虑的表情和混乱,标志着在周六晚上举行的节日的高潮。到周一早上,整个城市将开始被拆解。建立这座城市的复杂编排被颠倒了。到十月中旬,这座城市消失了,黑岩沙漠的寂静和广阔又回来了。媒体对黑石城的友好形象集中在“男人”的牺牲和周围的奇观上。但正如卡洛琳·l·怀特在《火人节的考古学》中所说,黑石城不仅仅是美国最著名的夏季节日的举办地。其城市结构的轮廓和时间性为“活跃遗址”考古学中最雄心勃勃的实验之一提供了媒介,因为当代考古学的领军人物在本世纪初提出了这个概念。什么是活跃遗址考古学?如果说当代考古学是关于理解最近的过去——通常是我们认为理所当然的日常生活的方方面面,但往往没有记录在案——那么活跃遗址考古学则把它放在了今天人们仍然居住和使用的地方的背景下。这不仅仅是对城市生活环境的研究。怀特解释说,与大多数考古项目不同的是,这些考古项目研究的是古代或现代的废弃遗址,因为“它每年都会存在一周”,当人们自愿地在一个有限的、密集的城市环境中聚集在一起时,它“提供了人们为自己创造的各种结构和社会环境的加速例子”。在这个更广泛的背景下,一系列其他问题为本书提供了方向和结构。人们在这个城市是怎样生活的?伯纳生命的物质特征是什么?人们是如何设置权宜空间的?在这些空间里什么是重要的?六个内容丰富的章节带领我们进行了一次民族志之旅——其他人称之为“考古民族志”(Harrison and Schofield 2010,第91页)——通过跟踪黑石城的建设、占领和拆除周期,了解了黑石城的物质性和空间性。白色受到宾福德民族考古学的影响,其特点是详细
The Archaeology of Burning Man. The Rise and Fall of Black Rock City
For ten months of the year the Black Rock Desert of northwestern Nevada is one of the emptiest spaces in the American West. Between August and October, the silence and vastness of the playa is interrupted by what could be described as a wonder of the modern world: the raising, occupation, and disassembling of Black Rock City; quite possibly the largest seasonally inhabited settlement in the Americas. In the space of a few short weeks, survey teams, machines, shipping containers and porta-potties invade the ‘smooth space’ of this one-time ancient lakebed and transform it into a vast city: ‘striated space’ in the shape of a giant clock, but with the built space forming a semicircle reminiscent of a giant horseshoe. Concentric and radial streets (the latter named for the hours of the day) form city blocks while public plazas punctuate the length and breadth of its great arc. With its infrastructure established the city is ready to meet its festival goers, ‘Burners’, who arrive on mass in a convoy of pickup trucks for the week-long event (in 2019 there were more than 75,000 people). The planned city blocks are then filled by a myriad of camps and provisioning centres. The empty space at the geographic heart of the city forms a grand public plaza and is set aside for Black Rock City’s most famous resident: the ‘Man’, a giant humanoid effigy who will be set ablaze at the festival’s zenith. The ‘burn’ and the carefree expression and chaos that surround it, signifies the climax of the festival, which takes place on a Saturday night. By Monday morning, the entire city will begin to be disassembled. The complex choreography that erected the city is put into reverse. By the middle of October, the city has disappeared and the silence and vastness of the Black Rock Desert returns. The media friendly image of Black Rock city focuses on the immolation of the Man and the spectacle that surround it. But as Carolyn L. White argues in The Archaeology of Burning Man, Black Rock City is much more than the setting for America’s most celebrated summer festival. The contours and temporalities of its urban fabric provide the medium for one of the most ambitious experiments in ‘active site’ archaeology since leading lights in contemporary archaeology came up with the concept earlier this century. What is active site archaeology? If contemporary archaeology is about understanding the very recent past – usually aspects of daily life that we take for granted, but which often go undocumented – active site archaeology puts this into the context of places that are still inhabited and used by people today. This is more than just the study of a lived-in urban setting. As White explains, unlike most archaeology projects, which study abandoned sites, ancient or modern, given that ‘it exists for one week a year, every year’, it ‘provides an accelerated example of the kinds of structures and social situations that people create for themselves’ when they come together, voluntarily, within a time-limited, dense urban setting. Within this wider context, a range of other questions provide the book with direction and structure. How do people live in this city? What are the material signatures of the lives of Burners? How do people set up expedient spaces? And what is important in those spaces? Six meaty chapters take us on an ethnographic tour – what others have termed ‘archaeoethnography’ (Harrison and Schofield 2010, p. 91) – of the materiality and spatiality of Black Rock City by following its cycles of building, occupation, and dismantling. White is influenced by Binfordian ethnoarchaeology and its characteristically detailed
期刊介绍:
Norwegian Archaeological Review published since 1968, aims to be an interface between archaeological research in the Nordic countries and global archaeological trends, a meeting ground for current discussion of theoretical and methodical problems on an international scientific level. The main focus is on the European area, but discussions based upon results from other parts of the world are also welcomed. The comments of specialists, along with the author"s reply, are given as an addendum to selected articles. The Journal is also receptive to uninvited opinions and comments on a wider scope of archaeological themes, e.g. articles in Norwegian Archaeological Review or other journals, monographies, conferences.