让-吕克·南希:诗学、政治学与描写情色学

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 Q4 CULTURAL STUDIES
J. Ricco
{"title":"让-吕克·南希:诗学、政治学与描写情色学","authors":"J. Ricco","doi":"10.1080/13534645.2021.1896083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The genealogy of the concept of exscription dates back to Jean-Luc Nancy’s 1988 essay, ‘L’excrit’ [‘Exscription’], in which he presented a philosophical meditation on the oeuvre of Georges Bataille. Work that, as Nancy says, serves as a reminder of the impossibility of communication as the condition for any sense of community. Coming just two years after the seminar on Bataille that he taught and that would result in his most well-known essay, ‘The Inoperative Community’, along with the accompanying essay, ‘Literary Communism’, Nancy’s essay on exscription actually brings together two texts written eleven years apart: ‘Reasons to Write’ (April 1977) and ‘Reasons to Read’ (August 1988). While it is in the latter that the term exscription is introduced, by pairing it with the earlier text, Nancy makes clear that we are to understand exscription as the reason why there are reasons to read and to write. At the same time, with his neologism marking the opening and exposure of inscription to the Outside, Nancy argues that the spacing of community is in-appropriable and therefore impossible to fully inscribe (or circumscribe, prescribe, and perhaps even to describe). In other words, of community there remains something incommunicable, unemployable, and indeed unintelligible. It is this limit, suspension, and impossibility at the heart of community that is written and read as exscription.","PeriodicalId":46204,"journal":{"name":"Parallax","volume":"26 1","pages":"361 - 365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13534645.2021.1896083","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jean-Luc Nancy: Poetics, Politics & Erotics of Exscription\",\"authors\":\"J. Ricco\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13534645.2021.1896083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The genealogy of the concept of exscription dates back to Jean-Luc Nancy’s 1988 essay, ‘L’excrit’ [‘Exscription’], in which he presented a philosophical meditation on the oeuvre of Georges Bataille. Work that, as Nancy says, serves as a reminder of the impossibility of communication as the condition for any sense of community. Coming just two years after the seminar on Bataille that he taught and that would result in his most well-known essay, ‘The Inoperative Community’, along with the accompanying essay, ‘Literary Communism’, Nancy’s essay on exscription actually brings together two texts written eleven years apart: ‘Reasons to Write’ (April 1977) and ‘Reasons to Read’ (August 1988). While it is in the latter that the term exscription is introduced, by pairing it with the earlier text, Nancy makes clear that we are to understand exscription as the reason why there are reasons to read and to write. At the same time, with his neologism marking the opening and exposure of inscription to the Outside, Nancy argues that the spacing of community is in-appropriable and therefore impossible to fully inscribe (or circumscribe, prescribe, and perhaps even to describe). In other words, of community there remains something incommunicable, unemployable, and indeed unintelligible. It is this limit, suspension, and impossibility at the heart of community that is written and read as exscription.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Parallax\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"361 - 365\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13534645.2021.1896083\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Parallax\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2021.1896083\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parallax","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2021.1896083","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

的谱系exscription的概念可以追溯到jean - luc南希的1988篇文章,“L 'excrit”(“exscription”),他提出了一个哲学冥想借的作品。工作,正如南希所说,提醒我们沟通是不可能成为任何社区意识的条件。就在他讲授巴塔耶研讨会的两年后,也就是他最著名的论文《不起作用的社区》,以及伴随的论文《文学共产主义》,南希关于描述的文章实际上汇集了两篇相隔11年的文章:《写作的理由》(1977年4月)和《阅读的理由》(1988年8月)。虽然在后一篇文章中引入了“描述”一词,但通过将其与前一篇文章配对,南希清楚地表明,我们应该将描述理解为为什么有理由阅读和写作。与此同时,南希的新词标志着铭文的开放和对外暴露,他认为社区的间隔是不合适的,因此不可能完全铭文(或限定、规定,甚至可能描述)。换句话说,社会中仍然存在着某种不可沟通的、不可利用的、甚至是不可理解的东西。正是这种限制、暂停和不可能在社区的核心,被书写和阅读为描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Jean-Luc Nancy: Poetics, Politics & Erotics of Exscription
The genealogy of the concept of exscription dates back to Jean-Luc Nancy’s 1988 essay, ‘L’excrit’ [‘Exscription’], in which he presented a philosophical meditation on the oeuvre of Georges Bataille. Work that, as Nancy says, serves as a reminder of the impossibility of communication as the condition for any sense of community. Coming just two years after the seminar on Bataille that he taught and that would result in his most well-known essay, ‘The Inoperative Community’, along with the accompanying essay, ‘Literary Communism’, Nancy’s essay on exscription actually brings together two texts written eleven years apart: ‘Reasons to Write’ (April 1977) and ‘Reasons to Read’ (August 1988). While it is in the latter that the term exscription is introduced, by pairing it with the earlier text, Nancy makes clear that we are to understand exscription as the reason why there are reasons to read and to write. At the same time, with his neologism marking the opening and exposure of inscription to the Outside, Nancy argues that the spacing of community is in-appropriable and therefore impossible to fully inscribe (or circumscribe, prescribe, and perhaps even to describe). In other words, of community there remains something incommunicable, unemployable, and indeed unintelligible. It is this limit, suspension, and impossibility at the heart of community that is written and read as exscription.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Parallax
Parallax Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Founded in 1995, parallax has established an international reputation for bringing together outstanding new work in cultural studies, critical theory and philosophy. parallax publishes themed issues that aim to provoke exploratory, interdisciplinary thinking and response. Each issue of parallax provides a forum for a wide spectrum of perspectives on a topical question or concern. parallax will be of interest to those working in cultural studies, critical theory, cultural history, philosophy, gender studies, queer theory, post-colonial theory, English and comparative literature, aesthetics, art history and visual cultures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信