胸部无袖带血压监测系统的临床研究

Fatemeh Heydari, Malikeh P. Ebrahim, Jean-Michel Redoute, Keith Joe, Katie Walker, Alberto Avolio, Mehmet R. Yuce
{"title":"胸部无袖带血压监测系统的临床研究","authors":"Fatemeh Heydari,&nbsp;Malikeh P. Ebrahim,&nbsp;Jean-Michel Redoute,&nbsp;Keith Joe,&nbsp;Katie Walker,&nbsp;Alberto Avolio,&nbsp;Mehmet R. Yuce","doi":"10.1002/mds3.10091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This work presents a clinical study of a chest-based blood pressure (BP) monitoring technique. This research was designed to examine pulse transit time (PTT) and to measure beat-to-beat and cuff-based systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP). The PTT values were extracted as the time difference between the end of the pre-ejection period (PEP) measured using an on-body continuous-wave radar (CWR) sensor and the pulse arrival time (PAT) in central arteries extracted from the shoulders' bio-impedance (BImp) signal. The system was investigated under three experimental conditions: (a) resting at various postures; (b) rising exercise stress, followed by resting; and (c) spraying inconstant doses of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) medicine and recovery. Data were collected from 43 volunteers who participated in posture recordings, 26 undertook exercises and 17 experienced GTN spray. The BImp-based PTT was compared with PPG-based one (peripheral) in terms of BP estimation. Various mathematical methods of calculating BPs from PTTs were investigated to gain the most accurate outcomes. We demonstrate the accuracy of each model in this work. Our study found that cuffless BP determined from PTT derived from central arteries shows more than 3% accuracy compared to that determined from peripheral arteries.</p>","PeriodicalId":87324,"journal":{"name":"Medical devices & sensors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/mds3.10091","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical study of a chest-based cuffless blood pressure monitoring system\",\"authors\":\"Fatemeh Heydari,&nbsp;Malikeh P. Ebrahim,&nbsp;Jean-Michel Redoute,&nbsp;Keith Joe,&nbsp;Katie Walker,&nbsp;Alberto Avolio,&nbsp;Mehmet R. Yuce\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mds3.10091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This work presents a clinical study of a chest-based blood pressure (BP) monitoring technique. This research was designed to examine pulse transit time (PTT) and to measure beat-to-beat and cuff-based systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP). The PTT values were extracted as the time difference between the end of the pre-ejection period (PEP) measured using an on-body continuous-wave radar (CWR) sensor and the pulse arrival time (PAT) in central arteries extracted from the shoulders' bio-impedance (BImp) signal. The system was investigated under three experimental conditions: (a) resting at various postures; (b) rising exercise stress, followed by resting; and (c) spraying inconstant doses of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) medicine and recovery. Data were collected from 43 volunteers who participated in posture recordings, 26 undertook exercises and 17 experienced GTN spray. The BImp-based PTT was compared with PPG-based one (peripheral) in terms of BP estimation. Various mathematical methods of calculating BPs from PTTs were investigated to gain the most accurate outcomes. We demonstrate the accuracy of each model in this work. Our study found that cuffless BP determined from PTT derived from central arteries shows more than 3% accuracy compared to that determined from peripheral arteries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical devices & sensors\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/mds3.10091\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical devices & sensors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mds3.10091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical devices & sensors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mds3.10091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文介绍了一种基于胸部的血压(BP)监测技术的临床研究。本研究旨在检查脉搏传递时间(PTT),测量搏动间和袖带收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)。PTT值被提取为预弹射期(PEP)结束的时间差,该时间差由体上连续波雷达(CWR)传感器测量,与从肩部生物阻抗(BImp)信号中提取的中央动脉脉冲到达时间(PAT)之间的时间差。在三种实验条件下对该系统进行了研究:(a)以不同姿势休息;(b)运动压力升高,随后休息;(c)喷洒不恒定剂量的三硝酸甘油(GTN)药物和恢复。数据收集自43名志愿者,他们参与了姿势记录,26人进行了锻炼,17人经历了GTN喷雾。在BP估计方面,将基于bimp的PTT与基于ppg的PTT (peripheral)进行比较。研究了从ptt计算bp的各种数学方法,以获得最准确的结果。我们在这项工作中证明了每个模型的准确性。我们的研究发现,与外周动脉测定的血压相比,由中心动脉的PTT测定的无套管血压准确度超过3%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Clinical study of a chest-based cuffless blood pressure monitoring system

Clinical study of a chest-based cuffless blood pressure monitoring system

This work presents a clinical study of a chest-based blood pressure (BP) monitoring technique. This research was designed to examine pulse transit time (PTT) and to measure beat-to-beat and cuff-based systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP). The PTT values were extracted as the time difference between the end of the pre-ejection period (PEP) measured using an on-body continuous-wave radar (CWR) sensor and the pulse arrival time (PAT) in central arteries extracted from the shoulders' bio-impedance (BImp) signal. The system was investigated under three experimental conditions: (a) resting at various postures; (b) rising exercise stress, followed by resting; and (c) spraying inconstant doses of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) medicine and recovery. Data were collected from 43 volunteers who participated in posture recordings, 26 undertook exercises and 17 experienced GTN spray. The BImp-based PTT was compared with PPG-based one (peripheral) in terms of BP estimation. Various mathematical methods of calculating BPs from PTTs were investigated to gain the most accurate outcomes. We demonstrate the accuracy of each model in this work. Our study found that cuffless BP determined from PTT derived from central arteries shows more than 3% accuracy compared to that determined from peripheral arteries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信