{"title":"LSTM与TCN模型在半潜式平台波浪起伏预报中的比较研究","authors":"Yan Li, Longfei Xiao, Handi Wei, De-xin Li, Xu Li","doi":"10.1115/1.4063266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Wave runup prediction is necessary for the offshore structure designs and early warnings. Data-driven methods based on machine learning have inspired reduced-order solutions for wave-structure interaction problems. This study provides the quantification of deep learning algorithms' potential for wave runup prediction. Two prominent deep learning models were utilized to predict the wave runups along the fore column of semi-submersible under head seas. The long short-term memory (LSTM) and the temporal convolutional networks (TCN) were comprehensively compared based on the datasets from a model test carried out in the deep ocean basin. The LSTM and TCN model structures were optimized to compare prediction accuracy and computational complexity reasonably. The results reveal that: (1) both developed TCN and LSTM models had satisfied prediction accuracy of over 90 %. Their predictions were extended to 10 seconds into the future with accuracies over 80 % and 45 %, respectively. (2) With the noise-extended datasets, the LSTM model was robust to noises, while the TCN model showed better prediction performance on the extreme wave runup events. (3) The incident wave and dominant rotation provided the major information for wave runup prediction. TCN and LSTM models' prediction accuracies were 91.5 % and 89.3 % based on the simplified input tensors composed of incident wave and pitch. The comparison showed the great potential of TCN model to predict the nonlinear wave runup with less time and memory costs. The input tensors design and optimization based on physical understanding also play a significant role in the prediction performance.","PeriodicalId":50106,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of LSTM and TCN Models for Semi-submersible Platform Wave Runup Prediction\",\"authors\":\"Yan Li, Longfei Xiao, Handi Wei, De-xin Li, Xu Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4063266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Wave runup prediction is necessary for the offshore structure designs and early warnings. Data-driven methods based on machine learning have inspired reduced-order solutions for wave-structure interaction problems. This study provides the quantification of deep learning algorithms' potential for wave runup prediction. Two prominent deep learning models were utilized to predict the wave runups along the fore column of semi-submersible under head seas. The long short-term memory (LSTM) and the temporal convolutional networks (TCN) were comprehensively compared based on the datasets from a model test carried out in the deep ocean basin. The LSTM and TCN model structures were optimized to compare prediction accuracy and computational complexity reasonably. The results reveal that: (1) both developed TCN and LSTM models had satisfied prediction accuracy of over 90 %. Their predictions were extended to 10 seconds into the future with accuracies over 80 % and 45 %, respectively. (2) With the noise-extended datasets, the LSTM model was robust to noises, while the TCN model showed better prediction performance on the extreme wave runup events. (3) The incident wave and dominant rotation provided the major information for wave runup prediction. TCN and LSTM models' prediction accuracies were 91.5 % and 89.3 % based on the simplified input tensors composed of incident wave and pitch. The comparison showed the great potential of TCN model to predict the nonlinear wave runup with less time and memory costs. The input tensors design and optimization based on physical understanding also play a significant role in the prediction performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering-Transactions of the Asme\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering-Transactions of the Asme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063266\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063266","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Comparative Study of LSTM and TCN Models for Semi-submersible Platform Wave Runup Prediction
Wave runup prediction is necessary for the offshore structure designs and early warnings. Data-driven methods based on machine learning have inspired reduced-order solutions for wave-structure interaction problems. This study provides the quantification of deep learning algorithms' potential for wave runup prediction. Two prominent deep learning models were utilized to predict the wave runups along the fore column of semi-submersible under head seas. The long short-term memory (LSTM) and the temporal convolutional networks (TCN) were comprehensively compared based on the datasets from a model test carried out in the deep ocean basin. The LSTM and TCN model structures were optimized to compare prediction accuracy and computational complexity reasonably. The results reveal that: (1) both developed TCN and LSTM models had satisfied prediction accuracy of over 90 %. Their predictions were extended to 10 seconds into the future with accuracies over 80 % and 45 %, respectively. (2) With the noise-extended datasets, the LSTM model was robust to noises, while the TCN model showed better prediction performance on the extreme wave runup events. (3) The incident wave and dominant rotation provided the major information for wave runup prediction. TCN and LSTM models' prediction accuracies were 91.5 % and 89.3 % based on the simplified input tensors composed of incident wave and pitch. The comparison showed the great potential of TCN model to predict the nonlinear wave runup with less time and memory costs. The input tensors design and optimization based on physical understanding also play a significant role in the prediction performance.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering is an international resource for original peer-reviewed research that advances the state of knowledge on all aspects of analysis, design, and technology development in ocean, offshore, arctic, and related fields. Its main goals are to provide a forum for timely and in-depth exchanges of scientific and technical information among researchers and engineers. It emphasizes fundamental research and development studies as well as review articles that offer either retrospective perspectives on well-established topics or exposures to innovative or novel developments. Case histories are not encouraged. The journal also documents significant developments in related fields and major accomplishments of renowned scientists by programming themed issues to record such events.
Scope: Offshore Mechanics, Drilling Technology, Fixed and Floating Production Systems; Ocean Engineering, Hydrodynamics, and Ship Motions; Ocean Climate Statistics, Storms, Extremes, and Hurricanes; Structural Mechanics; Safety, Reliability, Risk Assessment, and Uncertainty Quantification; Riser Mechanics, Cable and Mooring Dynamics, Pipeline and Subsea Technology; Materials Engineering, Fatigue, Fracture, Welding Technology, Non-destructive Testing, Inspection Technologies, Corrosion Protection and Control; Fluid-structure Interaction, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Flow and Vortex-Induced Vibrations; Marine and Offshore Geotechnics, Soil Mechanics, Soil-pipeline Interaction; Ocean Renewable Energy; Ocean Space Utilization and Aquaculture Engineering; Petroleum Technology; Polar and Arctic Science and Technology, Ice Mechanics, Arctic Drilling and Exploration, Arctic Structures, Ice-structure and Ship Interaction, Permafrost Engineering, Arctic and Thermal Design.