比较下行保护策略

IF 1.1 4区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
D. Liu
{"title":"比较下行保护策略","authors":"D. Liu","doi":"10.3905/jpm.2023.1.493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the author uses a common framework to evaluate and compare various equity downside protection strategies including constant proportion portfolio insurance, volatility targeting, and a few option-based strategies in terms of the trade-off between downside protection and upside participation. Using the downside-to-upside performance ratio to measure that trade-off, the author finds that all these strategies offer the same trade-off over the many market cycles from 1996 to 2020. However, strategies with a concave payoff profile (such as put spread collar used in buffered exchange-traded funds or defined outcome exchange-traded funds) offer a better trade-off during the early stage of drawdown and recovery, and strategies with a convex payoff profile such as constant proportion portfolio insurance offer a better trade-off during the late stage of drawdown and recovery. The author’s results and insights allow investors to enhance their understanding of downside protection strategies and select the best strategy for their investment use case.","PeriodicalId":53670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Portfolio Management","volume":"49 1","pages":"116 - 143"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Downside Protection Strategies\",\"authors\":\"D. Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jpm.2023.1.493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, the author uses a common framework to evaluate and compare various equity downside protection strategies including constant proportion portfolio insurance, volatility targeting, and a few option-based strategies in terms of the trade-off between downside protection and upside participation. Using the downside-to-upside performance ratio to measure that trade-off, the author finds that all these strategies offer the same trade-off over the many market cycles from 1996 to 2020. However, strategies with a concave payoff profile (such as put spread collar used in buffered exchange-traded funds or defined outcome exchange-traded funds) offer a better trade-off during the early stage of drawdown and recovery, and strategies with a convex payoff profile such as constant proportion portfolio insurance offer a better trade-off during the late stage of drawdown and recovery. The author’s results and insights allow investors to enhance their understanding of downside protection strategies and select the best strategy for their investment use case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Portfolio Management\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"116 - 143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Portfolio Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2023.1.493\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Portfolio Management","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2023.1.493","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,作者使用一个通用的框架来评估和比较各种股票下行保护策略,包括恒比例投资组合保险、波动性目标和一些基于期权的策略,以在下行保护和上行参与之间进行权衡。使用下行与上行的绩效比来衡量这种权衡,作者发现,在1996年至2020年的许多市场周期中,所有这些策略都提供了相同的权衡。然而,具有凹回报曲线的策略(如缓冲交易所交易基金或固定结果交易所交易基金中使用的看跌价差项圈)在提款和复苏的早期阶段提供了更好的权衡,而具有凸回报曲线的战略,如恒比例投资组合保险,在提款和恢复的后期阶段提供了较好的权衡。作者的研究结果和见解使投资者能够增强对下行保护策略的理解,并为他们的投资用例选择最佳策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Downside Protection Strategies
In this article, the author uses a common framework to evaluate and compare various equity downside protection strategies including constant proportion portfolio insurance, volatility targeting, and a few option-based strategies in terms of the trade-off between downside protection and upside participation. Using the downside-to-upside performance ratio to measure that trade-off, the author finds that all these strategies offer the same trade-off over the many market cycles from 1996 to 2020. However, strategies with a concave payoff profile (such as put spread collar used in buffered exchange-traded funds or defined outcome exchange-traded funds) offer a better trade-off during the early stage of drawdown and recovery, and strategies with a convex payoff profile such as constant proportion portfolio insurance offer a better trade-off during the late stage of drawdown and recovery. The author’s results and insights allow investors to enhance their understanding of downside protection strategies and select the best strategy for their investment use case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Portfolio Management
Journal of Portfolio Management Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
28.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Founded by Peter Bernstein in 1974, The Journal of Portfolio Management (JPM) is the definitive source of thought-provoking analysis and practical techniques in institutional investing. It offers cutting-edge research on asset allocation, performance measurement, market trends, risk management, portfolio optimization, and more. Each quarterly issue of JPM features articles by the most renowned researchers and practitioners—including Nobel laureates—whose works define modern portfolio theory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信