性早熟儿童与非性早熟儿童自尊与焦虑水平的比较

Q4 Medicine
Burcu Bakırlıoğlu, D. Suluhan
{"title":"性早熟儿童与非性早熟儿童自尊与焦虑水平的比较","authors":"Burcu Bakırlıoğlu, D. Suluhan","doi":"10.4274/gulhane.galenos.2023.63308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: This study compared the self-esteem and anxiety levels of children diagnosed with precocious puberty (PP) and healthy children. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study design was performed. Female children with PP and healthy controls were compared for self-esteem and anxiety using the Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory (CSEI) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children with two sections including the State Anxiety Inventory for Children (SAIC) and the Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (TAIC). Results: The study included 172 children, 86 females with PP [median age (minimum-maximum) 9.41 (8-12.42) years] and 86 healthy controls [median age (minimum-maximum) 9.41 (8.08-12.08) years]. The SAIC scores of female children with PP were significantly higher than that of children without PP [27 (20-51) vs. 24 (20-43), respectively, p=0.002]. There were no differences in TAIC scores [33 (22-53) vs. 32 (20-50), p=0.062] and CSEI scores [80 (28-100) vs. 82 (48-100), p=0.196] between children with and without PP. A negative correlation was observed between the CSEI and SAIC scores in both children with PP (r=-0.354, p<0.001) and without PP (r=-0.339, p<0.001). A negative correlation was observed between the CSEI scores and the TAIC scores in both children with PP (r=-0.684, p<0.001) and without PP (r=-0.504, p=<0.001). Conclusions: The results of this study showed that female children with PP had higher state anxiety than non-PP peers. In both groups, self-esteem scores increased while anxiety scores decreased.","PeriodicalId":35658,"journal":{"name":"Gulhane Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of self-esteem and anxiety levels among children with and without precocious puberty\",\"authors\":\"Burcu Bakırlıoğlu, D. Suluhan\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/gulhane.galenos.2023.63308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims: This study compared the self-esteem and anxiety levels of children diagnosed with precocious puberty (PP) and healthy children. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study design was performed. Female children with PP and healthy controls were compared for self-esteem and anxiety using the Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory (CSEI) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children with two sections including the State Anxiety Inventory for Children (SAIC) and the Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (TAIC). Results: The study included 172 children, 86 females with PP [median age (minimum-maximum) 9.41 (8-12.42) years] and 86 healthy controls [median age (minimum-maximum) 9.41 (8.08-12.08) years]. The SAIC scores of female children with PP were significantly higher than that of children without PP [27 (20-51) vs. 24 (20-43), respectively, p=0.002]. There were no differences in TAIC scores [33 (22-53) vs. 32 (20-50), p=0.062] and CSEI scores [80 (28-100) vs. 82 (48-100), p=0.196] between children with and without PP. A negative correlation was observed between the CSEI and SAIC scores in both children with PP (r=-0.354, p<0.001) and without PP (r=-0.339, p<0.001). A negative correlation was observed between the CSEI scores and the TAIC scores in both children with PP (r=-0.684, p<0.001) and without PP (r=-0.504, p=<0.001). Conclusions: The results of this study showed that female children with PP had higher state anxiety than non-PP peers. In both groups, self-esteem scores increased while anxiety scores decreased.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gulhane Medical Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gulhane Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/gulhane.galenos.2023.63308\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gulhane Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/gulhane.galenos.2023.63308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究比较了被诊断为性早熟(PP)的儿童和健康儿童的自尊和焦虑水平。方法:采用横断面比较研究设计。采用Coopersmith自尊量表(CSEI)和儿童状态-特质焦虑量表(SAIC)和儿童特质焦虑量量表(TAIC)两个部分对患有PP的女性儿童和健康对照的自尊和焦虑进行比较。结果:该研究包括172名儿童,86名患有PP的女性[中位年龄(最小-最大值)9.41(8-12.42)岁]和86名健康对照[中位年纪(最小-最多值)9.42(8.08-12.08)岁]。患有PP的女性儿童的SAIC评分显著高于没有PP的儿童[27(20-51)vs.24(20-43),p=0.002]。患有PP和没有PP的女性之间的TAIC评分[33(22-53)vs.32(20-50),p=0.062]和CSEI评分[80(28-100)vs.82(48-100),p=0.016]没有差异。在有PP(r=-0.354,p<0.001)和无PP(r=-0.1339,p<001)的儿童中,CSEI和SAIC评分之间呈负相关。在有PP和无PP的儿童中(r=-0.684,p>0.001),CSEI评分和TAIC评分之间呈正相关与非PP同龄人相比,状态焦虑。在两组中,自尊得分增加,而焦虑得分降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of self-esteem and anxiety levels among children with and without precocious puberty
Aims: This study compared the self-esteem and anxiety levels of children diagnosed with precocious puberty (PP) and healthy children. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study design was performed. Female children with PP and healthy controls were compared for self-esteem and anxiety using the Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory (CSEI) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children with two sections including the State Anxiety Inventory for Children (SAIC) and the Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (TAIC). Results: The study included 172 children, 86 females with PP [median age (minimum-maximum) 9.41 (8-12.42) years] and 86 healthy controls [median age (minimum-maximum) 9.41 (8.08-12.08) years]. The SAIC scores of female children with PP were significantly higher than that of children without PP [27 (20-51) vs. 24 (20-43), respectively, p=0.002]. There were no differences in TAIC scores [33 (22-53) vs. 32 (20-50), p=0.062] and CSEI scores [80 (28-100) vs. 82 (48-100), p=0.196] between children with and without PP. A negative correlation was observed between the CSEI and SAIC scores in both children with PP (r=-0.354, p<0.001) and without PP (r=-0.339, p<0.001). A negative correlation was observed between the CSEI scores and the TAIC scores in both children with PP (r=-0.684, p<0.001) and without PP (r=-0.504, p=<0.001). Conclusions: The results of this study showed that female children with PP had higher state anxiety than non-PP peers. In both groups, self-esteem scores increased while anxiety scores decreased.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gulhane Medical Journal
Gulhane Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: History of the Gulhane Medical Journal goes back beyond the second half of the nineteenth century. "Ceride-i Tıbbiye-yi Askeriye" is the first journal published by the Turkish military medical community between 1871 and 1931. This journal was published as "Askeri Tıp Mecmuası", "Askeri Sıhhiye Mecmuası","Askeri Sıhhiye Dergisi" and "GATA Bülteni" between 1921 to 1931, 1931 to 1949, 1949 to 1956 and 1956 to 1998, respectively. The journal is currently being published as "Gülhane Tıp Dergisi" ("Gulhane Medical Journal") since the September 1998 issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信