可持续发展能带来更好的财务表现吗?回顾、元分析和命题

IF 3.8 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
U. Atz, Tracy Van Holt, Z. Liu, C. Bruno
{"title":"可持续发展能带来更好的财务表现吗?回顾、元分析和命题","authors":"U. Atz, Tracy Van Holt, Z. Liu, C. Bruno","doi":"10.1080/20430795.2022.2106934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Sustainability in business and ESG (environmental, social, and governance) in finance have exploded in popularity among researchers and practitioners. We surveyed 1,141 primary peer-reviewed papers and 27 meta-reviews (based on ∼1,400 underlying studies) published between 2015 and 2020. Aggregate conclusions from a sample suggest that the financial performance of ESG investing has on average been indistinguishable from conventional investing (with one in three studies indicating superior performance) – in contrast with research in the wider management literature as well as industry reports. Until recently top finance journals did not publish climate change related studies, yet these studies capture the frontier of corporate risk and ESG investment strategies. We developed three propositions: first, ESG integration as a strategy seems to perform better than screening or divestment; second, ESG investing provides asymmetric benefits, especially during a social or economic crisis; and third, decarbonization strategies can potentially capture a climate risk premium.","PeriodicalId":45546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment","volume":"13 1","pages":"802 - 825"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does sustainability generate better financial performance? review, meta-analysis, and propositions\",\"authors\":\"U. Atz, Tracy Van Holt, Z. Liu, C. Bruno\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20430795.2022.2106934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Sustainability in business and ESG (environmental, social, and governance) in finance have exploded in popularity among researchers and practitioners. We surveyed 1,141 primary peer-reviewed papers and 27 meta-reviews (based on ∼1,400 underlying studies) published between 2015 and 2020. Aggregate conclusions from a sample suggest that the financial performance of ESG investing has on average been indistinguishable from conventional investing (with one in three studies indicating superior performance) – in contrast with research in the wider management literature as well as industry reports. Until recently top finance journals did not publish climate change related studies, yet these studies capture the frontier of corporate risk and ESG investment strategies. We developed three propositions: first, ESG integration as a strategy seems to perform better than screening or divestment; second, ESG investing provides asymmetric benefits, especially during a social or economic crisis; and third, decarbonization strategies can potentially capture a climate risk premium.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"802 - 825\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2022.2106934\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2022.2106934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

商业领域的可持续性和金融领域的ESG(环境、社会和治理)在研究人员和从业人员中广受欢迎。我们调查了2015年至2020年间发表的1141篇同行评议论文和27篇元综述(基于约1400项基础研究)。从一个样本中得出的综合结论表明,ESG投资的财务业绩平均而言与传统投资没有区别(三分之一的研究表明业绩更好),这与更广泛的管理文献和行业报告中的研究形成了对比。直到最近,顶级金融期刊还没有发表与气候变化相关的研究,但这些研究抓住了企业风险和ESG投资策略的前沿。我们提出了三个命题:首先,ESG整合作为一种战略似乎比筛选或撤资效果更好;第二,ESG投资带来了非对称收益,尤其是在社会或经济危机期间;第三,脱碳战略可能会带来气候风险溢价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does sustainability generate better financial performance? review, meta-analysis, and propositions
ABSTRACT Sustainability in business and ESG (environmental, social, and governance) in finance have exploded in popularity among researchers and practitioners. We surveyed 1,141 primary peer-reviewed papers and 27 meta-reviews (based on ∼1,400 underlying studies) published between 2015 and 2020. Aggregate conclusions from a sample suggest that the financial performance of ESG investing has on average been indistinguishable from conventional investing (with one in three studies indicating superior performance) – in contrast with research in the wider management literature as well as industry reports. Until recently top finance journals did not publish climate change related studies, yet these studies capture the frontier of corporate risk and ESG investment strategies. We developed three propositions: first, ESG integration as a strategy seems to perform better than screening or divestment; second, ESG investing provides asymmetric benefits, especially during a social or economic crisis; and third, decarbonization strategies can potentially capture a climate risk premium.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
7.00%
发文量
55
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信