{"title":"论概率计算的逻辑基础","authors":"Melissa Antonelli , Ugo Dal Lago , Paolo Pistone","doi":"10.1016/j.apal.2023.103341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The overall purpose of the present work is to lay the foundations for a new approach to bridge logic and probabilistic computation. To this aim we introduce extensions of classical and intuitionistic propositional logic with <em>counting quantifiers</em>, that is, quantifiers that measure <em>to which extent</em> a formula is true. The resulting systems, called <span><math><mi>cCPL</mi></math></span> and <span><math><mi>iCPL</mi></math></span>, respectively, admit a natural semantics, based on the Borel <em>σ</em>-algebra of the Cantor space, together with a sound and complete proof system. Our main results consist in relating <span><math><mi>cCPL</mi></math></span> and <span><math><mi>iCPL</mi></math></span> with some central concepts in the study of probabilistic computation. On the one hand, the validity of <span><math><mi>cCPL</mi></math></span>-formulae in prenex form characterizes the corresponding level of Wagner's hierarchy of counting complexity classes, closely related to probabilistic complexity. On the other hand, proofs in <span><math><mi>iCPL</mi></math></span> correspond, in the sense of Curry and Howard, to typing derivations for a randomized extension of the <em>λ</em>-calculus, so that counting quantifiers reveal the probability of termination of the underlying probabilistic programs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50762,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pure and Applied Logic","volume":"175 9","pages":"Article 103341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168007223000982/pdfft?md5=1667c28a58bd5b8e526d000072ac7e9b&pid=1-s2.0-S0168007223000982-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards logical foundations for probabilistic computation\",\"authors\":\"Melissa Antonelli , Ugo Dal Lago , Paolo Pistone\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apal.2023.103341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The overall purpose of the present work is to lay the foundations for a new approach to bridge logic and probabilistic computation. To this aim we introduce extensions of classical and intuitionistic propositional logic with <em>counting quantifiers</em>, that is, quantifiers that measure <em>to which extent</em> a formula is true. The resulting systems, called <span><math><mi>cCPL</mi></math></span> and <span><math><mi>iCPL</mi></math></span>, respectively, admit a natural semantics, based on the Borel <em>σ</em>-algebra of the Cantor space, together with a sound and complete proof system. Our main results consist in relating <span><math><mi>cCPL</mi></math></span> and <span><math><mi>iCPL</mi></math></span> with some central concepts in the study of probabilistic computation. On the one hand, the validity of <span><math><mi>cCPL</mi></math></span>-formulae in prenex form characterizes the corresponding level of Wagner's hierarchy of counting complexity classes, closely related to probabilistic complexity. On the other hand, proofs in <span><math><mi>iCPL</mi></math></span> correspond, in the sense of Curry and Howard, to typing derivations for a randomized extension of the <em>λ</em>-calculus, so that counting quantifiers reveal the probability of termination of the underlying probabilistic programs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Pure and Applied Logic\",\"volume\":\"175 9\",\"pages\":\"Article 103341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168007223000982/pdfft?md5=1667c28a58bd5b8e526d000072ac7e9b&pid=1-s2.0-S0168007223000982-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Pure and Applied Logic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168007223000982\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LOGIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Pure and Applied Logic","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168007223000982","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LOGIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
Towards logical foundations for probabilistic computation
The overall purpose of the present work is to lay the foundations for a new approach to bridge logic and probabilistic computation. To this aim we introduce extensions of classical and intuitionistic propositional logic with counting quantifiers, that is, quantifiers that measure to which extent a formula is true. The resulting systems, called and , respectively, admit a natural semantics, based on the Borel σ-algebra of the Cantor space, together with a sound and complete proof system. Our main results consist in relating and with some central concepts in the study of probabilistic computation. On the one hand, the validity of -formulae in prenex form characterizes the corresponding level of Wagner's hierarchy of counting complexity classes, closely related to probabilistic complexity. On the other hand, proofs in correspond, in the sense of Curry and Howard, to typing derivations for a randomized extension of the λ-calculus, so that counting quantifiers reveal the probability of termination of the underlying probabilistic programs.
期刊介绍:
The journal Annals of Pure and Applied Logic publishes high quality papers in all areas of mathematical logic as well as applications of logic in mathematics, in theoretical computer science and in other related disciplines. All submissions to the journal should be mathematically correct, well written (preferably in English)and contain relevant new results that are of significant interest to a substantial number of logicians. The journal also considers submissions that are somewhat too long to be published by other journals while being too short to form a separate memoir provided that they are of particular outstanding quality and broad interest. In addition, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic occasionally publishes special issues of selected papers from well-chosen conferences in pure and applied logic.