琼斯皇帝与黑人历史的道德意义

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
Molly Hiro
{"title":"琼斯皇帝与黑人历史的道德意义","authors":"Molly Hiro","doi":"10.1353/arq.2023.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:It’s common in both academic and popular discourse to think of a strong sense of identity as rooted in one’s relationship to a personal and collective past, but what are the pitfalls of this presumption, especially when it comes to the relevance of the Black past for Black (and for white) Americans? This article pursues this question by way of a look back at a hundred-year-old play, Eugene O’Neill’s The Emperor Jones, alongside its production and reception histories, and in the broader context of early twentieth-century efforts by African American writers to reclaim and rewrite their past. Reading the play in these contexts enables a critique of the contemporary impulse to cordon off the Black past as morally relevant only for Black Americans as well as a discovery of the possibilities and limits of shared recognition and responsibility for that past.","PeriodicalId":42394,"journal":{"name":"Arizona Quarterly","volume":"79 1","pages":"23 - 50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Emperor Jones and the Moral Meanings of the Black Past\",\"authors\":\"Molly Hiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/arq.2023.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:It’s common in both academic and popular discourse to think of a strong sense of identity as rooted in one’s relationship to a personal and collective past, but what are the pitfalls of this presumption, especially when it comes to the relevance of the Black past for Black (and for white) Americans? This article pursues this question by way of a look back at a hundred-year-old play, Eugene O’Neill’s The Emperor Jones, alongside its production and reception histories, and in the broader context of early twentieth-century efforts by African American writers to reclaim and rewrite their past. Reading the play in these contexts enables a critique of the contemporary impulse to cordon off the Black past as morally relevant only for Black Americans as well as a discovery of the possibilities and limits of shared recognition and responsibility for that past.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arizona Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"23 - 50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arizona Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/arq.2023.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arizona Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/arq.2023.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:在学术和大众话语中,认为强烈的认同感植根于个人和集体过去的关系是很常见的,但是这种假设的陷阱是什么,特别是当涉及到黑人(和白人)美国人的黑人过去的相关性时?本文通过回顾尤金·奥尼尔的百年戏剧《琼斯皇帝》,以及它的制作和接受历史,以及在20世纪早期非裔美国作家努力收回和重写他们的过去的更广泛背景下,来探讨这个问题。在这样的背景下阅读这部剧,可以批判当代把黑人的过去隔离开来的冲动,认为它只与美国黑人有关,也可以发现对过去的共同认识和责任的可能性和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Emperor Jones and the Moral Meanings of the Black Past
Abstract:It’s common in both academic and popular discourse to think of a strong sense of identity as rooted in one’s relationship to a personal and collective past, but what are the pitfalls of this presumption, especially when it comes to the relevance of the Black past for Black (and for white) Americans? This article pursues this question by way of a look back at a hundred-year-old play, Eugene O’Neill’s The Emperor Jones, alongside its production and reception histories, and in the broader context of early twentieth-century efforts by African American writers to reclaim and rewrite their past. Reading the play in these contexts enables a critique of the contemporary impulse to cordon off the Black past as morally relevant only for Black Americans as well as a discovery of the possibilities and limits of shared recognition and responsibility for that past.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arizona Quarterly
Arizona Quarterly LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Arizona Quarterly publishes scholarly essays on American literature, culture, and theory. It is our mission to subject these categories to debate, argument, interpretation, and contestation via critical readings of primary texts. We accept essays that are grounded in textual, formal, cultural, and theoretical examination of texts and situated with respect to current academic conversations whilst extending the boundaries thereof.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信