{"title":"琼斯皇帝与黑人历史的道德意义","authors":"Molly Hiro","doi":"10.1353/arq.2023.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:It’s common in both academic and popular discourse to think of a strong sense of identity as rooted in one’s relationship to a personal and collective past, but what are the pitfalls of this presumption, especially when it comes to the relevance of the Black past for Black (and for white) Americans? This article pursues this question by way of a look back at a hundred-year-old play, Eugene O’Neill’s The Emperor Jones, alongside its production and reception histories, and in the broader context of early twentieth-century efforts by African American writers to reclaim and rewrite their past. Reading the play in these contexts enables a critique of the contemporary impulse to cordon off the Black past as morally relevant only for Black Americans as well as a discovery of the possibilities and limits of shared recognition and responsibility for that past.","PeriodicalId":42394,"journal":{"name":"Arizona Quarterly","volume":"79 1","pages":"23 - 50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Emperor Jones and the Moral Meanings of the Black Past\",\"authors\":\"Molly Hiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/arq.2023.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:It’s common in both academic and popular discourse to think of a strong sense of identity as rooted in one’s relationship to a personal and collective past, but what are the pitfalls of this presumption, especially when it comes to the relevance of the Black past for Black (and for white) Americans? This article pursues this question by way of a look back at a hundred-year-old play, Eugene O’Neill’s The Emperor Jones, alongside its production and reception histories, and in the broader context of early twentieth-century efforts by African American writers to reclaim and rewrite their past. Reading the play in these contexts enables a critique of the contemporary impulse to cordon off the Black past as morally relevant only for Black Americans as well as a discovery of the possibilities and limits of shared recognition and responsibility for that past.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arizona Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"23 - 50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arizona Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/arq.2023.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arizona Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/arq.2023.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Emperor Jones and the Moral Meanings of the Black Past
Abstract:It’s common in both academic and popular discourse to think of a strong sense of identity as rooted in one’s relationship to a personal and collective past, but what are the pitfalls of this presumption, especially when it comes to the relevance of the Black past for Black (and for white) Americans? This article pursues this question by way of a look back at a hundred-year-old play, Eugene O’Neill’s The Emperor Jones, alongside its production and reception histories, and in the broader context of early twentieth-century efforts by African American writers to reclaim and rewrite their past. Reading the play in these contexts enables a critique of the contemporary impulse to cordon off the Black past as morally relevant only for Black Americans as well as a discovery of the possibilities and limits of shared recognition and responsibility for that past.
期刊介绍:
Arizona Quarterly publishes scholarly essays on American literature, culture, and theory. It is our mission to subject these categories to debate, argument, interpretation, and contestation via critical readings of primary texts. We accept essays that are grounded in textual, formal, cultural, and theoretical examination of texts and situated with respect to current academic conversations whilst extending the boundaries thereof.