马克思·范·马南的实践现象学:与教育科学和哲学的关系

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Problemos Pub Date : 2021-04-21 DOI:10.15388/PROBLEMOS.99.9
Sandra Kaire
{"title":"马克思·范·马南的实践现象学:与教育科学和哲学的关系","authors":"Sandra Kaire","doi":"10.15388/PROBLEMOS.99.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the method of the phenomenology of practice developed by the Canadian scholar Max van Manen. The paper describes the development and the main aspects of the phenomenology of practice as well as its importance and relevance to education sciences. However, in line with the critical remarks of the philosopher Dan Zahavi, the paper argues that there are fundamental problems with the phenomenology of practice in regard to phenomenology as philosophy. It is suggested that a researcher who applies this approach in his or her research should be cautious, critically evaluate van Manen’s presentation of phenomenology, and start his/her research from the phenomenological philosophy. Moreover, the paper argues that phenomenology should not be considered only as a methodological approach.","PeriodicalId":41448,"journal":{"name":"Problemos","volume":"99 1","pages":"118-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Max van Manen’s Phenomenology of Practice: Relation with Education Sciences and Philosophy\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Kaire\",\"doi\":\"10.15388/PROBLEMOS.99.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the method of the phenomenology of practice developed by the Canadian scholar Max van Manen. The paper describes the development and the main aspects of the phenomenology of practice as well as its importance and relevance to education sciences. However, in line with the critical remarks of the philosopher Dan Zahavi, the paper argues that there are fundamental problems with the phenomenology of practice in regard to phenomenology as philosophy. It is suggested that a researcher who applies this approach in his or her research should be cautious, critically evaluate van Manen’s presentation of phenomenology, and start his/her research from the phenomenological philosophy. Moreover, the paper argues that phenomenology should not be considered only as a methodological approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Problemos\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"118-130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Problemos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15388/PROBLEMOS.99.9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problemos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/PROBLEMOS.99.9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了加拿大学者Max van Manen提出的实践现象学方法。本文介绍了实践现象学的发展和主要方面,以及它对教育科学的重要性和相关性。然而,根据哲学家丹·扎哈维(Dan Zahavi)的批评意见,本文认为,从现象学作为哲学的角度来看,实践现象学存在根本性问题。建议在研究中应用这一方法的研究者应谨慎,批判性地评价范·马南的现象学呈现,并从现象学哲学开始研究。此外,本文认为现象学不应仅仅被视为一种方法论方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Max van Manen’s Phenomenology of Practice: Relation with Education Sciences and Philosophy
This paper investigates the method of the phenomenology of practice developed by the Canadian scholar Max van Manen. The paper describes the development and the main aspects of the phenomenology of practice as well as its importance and relevance to education sciences. However, in line with the critical remarks of the philosopher Dan Zahavi, the paper argues that there are fundamental problems with the phenomenology of practice in regard to phenomenology as philosophy. It is suggested that a researcher who applies this approach in his or her research should be cautious, critically evaluate van Manen’s presentation of phenomenology, and start his/her research from the phenomenological philosophy. Moreover, the paper argues that phenomenology should not be considered only as a methodological approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Problemos
Problemos PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信