{"title":"马克思·范·马南的实践现象学:与教育科学和哲学的关系","authors":"Sandra Kaire","doi":"10.15388/PROBLEMOS.99.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the method of the phenomenology of practice developed by the Canadian scholar Max van Manen. The paper describes the development and the main aspects of the phenomenology of practice as well as its importance and relevance to education sciences. However, in line with the critical remarks of the philosopher Dan Zahavi, the paper argues that there are fundamental problems with the phenomenology of practice in regard to phenomenology as philosophy. It is suggested that a researcher who applies this approach in his or her research should be cautious, critically evaluate van Manen’s presentation of phenomenology, and start his/her research from the phenomenological philosophy. Moreover, the paper argues that phenomenology should not be considered only as a methodological approach.","PeriodicalId":41448,"journal":{"name":"Problemos","volume":"99 1","pages":"118-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Max van Manen’s Phenomenology of Practice: Relation with Education Sciences and Philosophy\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Kaire\",\"doi\":\"10.15388/PROBLEMOS.99.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the method of the phenomenology of practice developed by the Canadian scholar Max van Manen. The paper describes the development and the main aspects of the phenomenology of practice as well as its importance and relevance to education sciences. However, in line with the critical remarks of the philosopher Dan Zahavi, the paper argues that there are fundamental problems with the phenomenology of practice in regard to phenomenology as philosophy. It is suggested that a researcher who applies this approach in his or her research should be cautious, critically evaluate van Manen’s presentation of phenomenology, and start his/her research from the phenomenological philosophy. Moreover, the paper argues that phenomenology should not be considered only as a methodological approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Problemos\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"118-130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Problemos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15388/PROBLEMOS.99.9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problemos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/PROBLEMOS.99.9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文考察了加拿大学者Max van Manen提出的实践现象学方法。本文介绍了实践现象学的发展和主要方面,以及它对教育科学的重要性和相关性。然而,根据哲学家丹·扎哈维(Dan Zahavi)的批评意见,本文认为,从现象学作为哲学的角度来看,实践现象学存在根本性问题。建议在研究中应用这一方法的研究者应谨慎,批判性地评价范·马南的现象学呈现,并从现象学哲学开始研究。此外,本文认为现象学不应仅仅被视为一种方法论方法。
Max van Manen’s Phenomenology of Practice: Relation with Education Sciences and Philosophy
This paper investigates the method of the phenomenology of practice developed by the Canadian scholar Max van Manen. The paper describes the development and the main aspects of the phenomenology of practice as well as its importance and relevance to education sciences. However, in line with the critical remarks of the philosopher Dan Zahavi, the paper argues that there are fundamental problems with the phenomenology of practice in regard to phenomenology as philosophy. It is suggested that a researcher who applies this approach in his or her research should be cautious, critically evaluate van Manen’s presentation of phenomenology, and start his/her research from the phenomenological philosophy. Moreover, the paper argues that phenomenology should not be considered only as a methodological approach.