饮食评估作为控制入侵物种的工具:具有稳定同位素的僧侣和玫瑰环长尾小鹦鹉的比较

Q2 Social Sciences
N. A. Borray-Escalante, D. Mazzoni, A. Ortega-Segalerva, L. Arroyo, V. Morera‐Pujol, J. González‐Solís, J. Senar
{"title":"饮食评估作为控制入侵物种的工具:具有稳定同位素的僧侣和玫瑰环长尾小鹦鹉的比较","authors":"N. A. Borray-Escalante, D. Mazzoni, A. Ortega-Segalerva, L. Arroyo, V. Morera‐Pujol, J. González‐Solís, J. Senar","doi":"10.1093/jue/juaa005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Food is a main limiting factor for most populations. As a consequence, knowledge about the diet of invasive alien species determines the design of control measures. The Monk and Rose-ringed parakeets are two typical species of successful invasive parrots that are highly appreciated by people. Although some observations suggest that Monk parakeets rely on a higher percentage of anthropogenic food than Rose-ringed parakeets, no detailed quantitative data is available. The aim of this study was to compare the diet of the two parakeets using stable isotope analysis (SIA). We performed SIA of carbon and nitrogen in feathers collected in Barcelona, Spain. We also measured isotopic ratios for potential food sources. We reconstructed the diet of parakeets using Bayesian mixing models. The two species differed in the isotopic signatures of their feathers for both δ13C and δ15N. Diet reconstruction showed that Monk parakeets feed mainly on anthropogenic food (41.7%), herbaceous plants (26.9%) and leaves/seeds (22.2%), while Rose-ringed parakeets feed mainly on flowers/fruits (44.1%), anthropogenic food provided in the trap located at the museum (32.4%) and leaves/seeds (23.1%). The more detailed information we can obtain from the diet of these species is useful to develop more effective control measures for their populations. The Monk parakeet may be more susceptible to control through education local residents, given the greater use of anthropogenic food in this species compared to Rose-ringed parakeet. Our conclusions also indicate that SIA is a powerful tool in providing crucial information about the diet and informing measures to control invasive species.","PeriodicalId":37022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Ecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/jue/juaa005","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diet assessments as a tool to control invasive species: comparison between Monk and Rose-ringed parakeets with stable isotopes\",\"authors\":\"N. A. Borray-Escalante, D. Mazzoni, A. Ortega-Segalerva, L. Arroyo, V. Morera‐Pujol, J. González‐Solís, J. Senar\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jue/juaa005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Food is a main limiting factor for most populations. As a consequence, knowledge about the diet of invasive alien species determines the design of control measures. The Monk and Rose-ringed parakeets are two typical species of successful invasive parrots that are highly appreciated by people. Although some observations suggest that Monk parakeets rely on a higher percentage of anthropogenic food than Rose-ringed parakeets, no detailed quantitative data is available. The aim of this study was to compare the diet of the two parakeets using stable isotope analysis (SIA). We performed SIA of carbon and nitrogen in feathers collected in Barcelona, Spain. We also measured isotopic ratios for potential food sources. We reconstructed the diet of parakeets using Bayesian mixing models. The two species differed in the isotopic signatures of their feathers for both δ13C and δ15N. Diet reconstruction showed that Monk parakeets feed mainly on anthropogenic food (41.7%), herbaceous plants (26.9%) and leaves/seeds (22.2%), while Rose-ringed parakeets feed mainly on flowers/fruits (44.1%), anthropogenic food provided in the trap located at the museum (32.4%) and leaves/seeds (23.1%). The more detailed information we can obtain from the diet of these species is useful to develop more effective control measures for their populations. The Monk parakeet may be more susceptible to control through education local residents, given the greater use of anthropogenic food in this species compared to Rose-ringed parakeet. Our conclusions also indicate that SIA is a powerful tool in providing crucial information about the diet and informing measures to control invasive species.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urban Ecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/jue/juaa005\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urban Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jue/juaa005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jue/juaa005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

食物是大多数人口的主要限制因素。因此,关于外来入侵物种饮食的知识决定了控制措施的设计。僧环长尾鹦鹉和玫瑰环长尾鹦鹉是两种典型的成功入侵鹦鹉,受到人们的高度赞赏。尽管一些观察结果表明,蒙克长尾小鹦鹉比玫瑰环长尾小鹦鹉依赖更高比例的人为食物,但目前还没有详细的定量数据。本研究的目的是使用稳定同位素分析(SIA)来比较这两只长尾小鹦鹉的饮食。我们在西班牙巴塞罗那采集的羽毛中进行了碳和氮的SIA。我们还测量了潜在食物来源的同位素比率。我们使用贝叶斯混合模型重建了长尾小鹦鹉的饮食。这两个物种的δ13C和δ15N的羽毛同位素特征不同。饮食重建显示,僧长尾小鹦鹉主要以人为食物(41.7%)、草本植物(26.9%)和叶片/种子(22.2%)为食,玫瑰环长尾小鹦鹉以花朵/果实为食(44.1%),博物馆陷阱中提供的人为食物(32.4%)和树叶/种子(23.1%)。我们可以从这些物种的饮食中获得更详细的信息,有助于为其种群制定更有效的控制措施。蒙克长尾小鹦鹉可能更容易通过教育当地居民来控制,因为与玫瑰环长尾小鹦鹉相比,该物种更多地使用人为食物。我们的结论还表明,SIA是一个强大的工具,可以提供有关饮食的重要信息,并为控制入侵物种的措施提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diet assessments as a tool to control invasive species: comparison between Monk and Rose-ringed parakeets with stable isotopes
Food is a main limiting factor for most populations. As a consequence, knowledge about the diet of invasive alien species determines the design of control measures. The Monk and Rose-ringed parakeets are two typical species of successful invasive parrots that are highly appreciated by people. Although some observations suggest that Monk parakeets rely on a higher percentage of anthropogenic food than Rose-ringed parakeets, no detailed quantitative data is available. The aim of this study was to compare the diet of the two parakeets using stable isotope analysis (SIA). We performed SIA of carbon and nitrogen in feathers collected in Barcelona, Spain. We also measured isotopic ratios for potential food sources. We reconstructed the diet of parakeets using Bayesian mixing models. The two species differed in the isotopic signatures of their feathers for both δ13C and δ15N. Diet reconstruction showed that Monk parakeets feed mainly on anthropogenic food (41.7%), herbaceous plants (26.9%) and leaves/seeds (22.2%), while Rose-ringed parakeets feed mainly on flowers/fruits (44.1%), anthropogenic food provided in the trap located at the museum (32.4%) and leaves/seeds (23.1%). The more detailed information we can obtain from the diet of these species is useful to develop more effective control measures for their populations. The Monk parakeet may be more susceptible to control through education local residents, given the greater use of anthropogenic food in this species compared to Rose-ringed parakeet. Our conclusions also indicate that SIA is a powerful tool in providing crucial information about the diet and informing measures to control invasive species.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Urban Ecology
Journal of Urban Ecology Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信