环境压力和储层压力下不同驱替剂在致密砂岩中自吸采油机理的实验研究

2区 工程技术 Q1 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Yinghe Chen , Jianguang Wei , Fahimeh Hadavimoghaddam , Xiaofeng Zhou , Mehdi Ostadhassan , Xiaoqing Zhao , Abdumalik Gayubov , Jiangtao Li , Anlun Wang , Ying Yang , Xuedong Shi
{"title":"环境压力和储层压力下不同驱替剂在致密砂岩中自吸采油机理的实验研究","authors":"Yinghe Chen ,&nbsp;Jianguang Wei ,&nbsp;Fahimeh Hadavimoghaddam ,&nbsp;Xiaofeng Zhou ,&nbsp;Mehdi Ostadhassan ,&nbsp;Xiaoqing Zhao ,&nbsp;Abdumalik Gayubov ,&nbsp;Jiangtao Li ,&nbsp;Anlun Wang ,&nbsp;Ying Yang ,&nbsp;Xuedong Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>This study explores oil recovery mechanisms of static imbibition<span> in a tight sandstone under different imbibition pressures, simultaneously optimizing imbibition agents. To this end, the static imbibition experiments of two common agents, polyacrylamide (PAM) slick water and anion–nonionic surfactants, are conducted under atmospheric and reservoir pressure (20 MPa). The interfacial tension and contact angle of these two imbibition fluids are also measured. Herein, the entire recovery period and imbibition equilibrium time vs. pressure are determined. Based on NMR and high-pressure mercury injection measurements, the contributions of pores with different sizes to the displacement recovery during imbibition are quantified. Under atmospheric pressure, the recovery rate with the surfactant was measured higher than that of the PAM slick water. The main reason was that the former has a lower interfacial tension (0.0961 mN/m), stronger </span></span>hydrophilicity<span> (average contact angle 27.7°), and stronger oil-displacing effect. Under a reservoir pressure of 20 MPa, the surfactant had lower recovery rate than the PAM slick water, while the latter enhanced the recovery further. Under atmospheric pressure, both agents recovered the crude oil in the medium-sized and larger pores whereas, under reservoir pressure (20 MPa), they mainly recovered oil from the smaller and medium-sized pores. At higher imbibition pressures, both agents recovered more oil from the smaller and medium-sized pores, and less from micropores and larger pores. This indicated that higher pressures can further improve the driving force of fluid replacement, to improve oil production from finer and medium-sized pores significantly. Under atmospheric pressure, both agents reached imbibition equilibrium in approximately 20 days while this period was reduced for the surfactant and slick water to 16 and 12 days, respectively. Based on the results PAM slick water is recommended for EOR purposes in tight sandstone which can be generalized to similar formations around the globe.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":16717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 111181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental study of oil recovery mechanisms during imbibition in tight sandstone with different fluid displacing agents under ambient and reservoir pressure\",\"authors\":\"Yinghe Chen ,&nbsp;Jianguang Wei ,&nbsp;Fahimeh Hadavimoghaddam ,&nbsp;Xiaofeng Zhou ,&nbsp;Mehdi Ostadhassan ,&nbsp;Xiaoqing Zhao ,&nbsp;Abdumalik Gayubov ,&nbsp;Jiangtao Li ,&nbsp;Anlun Wang ,&nbsp;Ying Yang ,&nbsp;Xuedong Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>This study explores oil recovery mechanisms of static imbibition<span> in a tight sandstone under different imbibition pressures, simultaneously optimizing imbibition agents. To this end, the static imbibition experiments of two common agents, polyacrylamide (PAM) slick water and anion–nonionic surfactants, are conducted under atmospheric and reservoir pressure (20 MPa). The interfacial tension and contact angle of these two imbibition fluids are also measured. Herein, the entire recovery period and imbibition equilibrium time vs. pressure are determined. Based on NMR and high-pressure mercury injection measurements, the contributions of pores with different sizes to the displacement recovery during imbibition are quantified. Under atmospheric pressure, the recovery rate with the surfactant was measured higher than that of the PAM slick water. The main reason was that the former has a lower interfacial tension (0.0961 mN/m), stronger </span></span>hydrophilicity<span> (average contact angle 27.7°), and stronger oil-displacing effect. Under a reservoir pressure of 20 MPa, the surfactant had lower recovery rate than the PAM slick water, while the latter enhanced the recovery further. Under atmospheric pressure, both agents recovered the crude oil in the medium-sized and larger pores whereas, under reservoir pressure (20 MPa), they mainly recovered oil from the smaller and medium-sized pores. At higher imbibition pressures, both agents recovered more oil from the smaller and medium-sized pores, and less from micropores and larger pores. This indicated that higher pressures can further improve the driving force of fluid replacement, to improve oil production from finer and medium-sized pores significantly. Under atmospheric pressure, both agents reached imbibition equilibrium in approximately 20 days while this period was reduced for the surfactant and slick water to 16 and 12 days, respectively. Based on the results PAM slick water is recommended for EOR purposes in tight sandstone which can be generalized to similar formations around the globe.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"220 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920410522010336\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920410522010336","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

研究了致密砂岩在不同渗吸压力下的静态渗吸采油机理,并对渗吸剂进行了优化。为此,在常压和储层压力(20 MPa)条件下,对聚丙烯酰胺(PAM)光滑水和阴离子-非离子表面活性剂进行了静态渗吸实验。测量了两种渗吸流体的界面张力和接触角。在这里,确定了整个采收率和吸胀平衡时间与压力的关系。基于核磁共振和高压压汞测量,定量分析了不同孔径孔隙对渗吸过程中驱替采收率的贡献。常压下,表面活性剂的回收率高于PAM光滑水的回收率。主要原因是前者具有较低的界面张力(0.0961 mN/m)、较强的亲水性(平均接触角27.7°)和较强的驱油效果。在储层压力为20 MPa时,表面活性剂的采收率低于PAM滑溜水,而后者进一步提高了采收率。常压下,两种药剂均在中、大型孔隙中采油,而在储层压力(20 MPa)下,两种药剂主要在中小孔隙中采油。在较高的渗吸压力下,两种药剂从中小孔隙中采收率较高,而从微孔和大孔隙中采收率较低。这表明,较高的压力可以进一步提高流体置换的驱动力,显著提高中细孔隙的产油量。在常压下,这两种剂在大约20天内达到吸胀平衡,而表面活性剂和光滑水的这一周期分别缩短至16天和12天。在此基础上,PAM滑溜水被推荐用于致密砂岩的EOR目的,可以推广到全球类似的地层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental study of oil recovery mechanisms during imbibition in tight sandstone with different fluid displacing agents under ambient and reservoir pressure

This study explores oil recovery mechanisms of static imbibition in a tight sandstone under different imbibition pressures, simultaneously optimizing imbibition agents. To this end, the static imbibition experiments of two common agents, polyacrylamide (PAM) slick water and anion–nonionic surfactants, are conducted under atmospheric and reservoir pressure (20 MPa). The interfacial tension and contact angle of these two imbibition fluids are also measured. Herein, the entire recovery period and imbibition equilibrium time vs. pressure are determined. Based on NMR and high-pressure mercury injection measurements, the contributions of pores with different sizes to the displacement recovery during imbibition are quantified. Under atmospheric pressure, the recovery rate with the surfactant was measured higher than that of the PAM slick water. The main reason was that the former has a lower interfacial tension (0.0961 mN/m), stronger hydrophilicity (average contact angle 27.7°), and stronger oil-displacing effect. Under a reservoir pressure of 20 MPa, the surfactant had lower recovery rate than the PAM slick water, while the latter enhanced the recovery further. Under atmospheric pressure, both agents recovered the crude oil in the medium-sized and larger pores whereas, under reservoir pressure (20 MPa), they mainly recovered oil from the smaller and medium-sized pores. At higher imbibition pressures, both agents recovered more oil from the smaller and medium-sized pores, and less from micropores and larger pores. This indicated that higher pressures can further improve the driving force of fluid replacement, to improve oil production from finer and medium-sized pores significantly. Under atmospheric pressure, both agents reached imbibition equilibrium in approximately 20 days while this period was reduced for the surfactant and slick water to 16 and 12 days, respectively. Based on the results PAM slick water is recommended for EOR purposes in tight sandstone which can be generalized to similar formations around the globe.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1511
审稿时长
13.5 months
期刊介绍: The objective of the Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering is to bridge the gap between the engineering, the geology and the science of petroleum and natural gas by publishing explicitly written articles intelligible to scientists and engineers working in any field of petroleum engineering, natural gas engineering and petroleum (natural gas) geology. An attempt is made in all issues to balance the subject matter and to appeal to a broad readership. The Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering covers the fields of petroleum (and natural gas) exploration, production and flow in its broadest possible sense. Topics include: origin and accumulation of petroleum and natural gas; petroleum geochemistry; reservoir engineering; reservoir simulation; rock mechanics; petrophysics; pore-level phenomena; well logging, testing and evaluation; mathematical modelling; enhanced oil and gas recovery; petroleum geology; compaction/diagenesis; petroleum economics; drilling and drilling fluids; thermodynamics and phase behavior; fluid mechanics; multi-phase flow in porous media; production engineering; formation evaluation; exploration methods; CO2 Sequestration in geological formations/sub-surface; management and development of unconventional resources such as heavy oil and bitumen, tight oil and liquid rich shales.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信