从第一夏娃到第二夏娃，或者没有塞梅莱的泰雷西亚

IF 0.1 2区文学 0 POETRY

Milton Studies Pub Date : 2018-09-12 DOI:10.1353/MLT.2018.0012

Eric B. Song

{"title":"从第一夏娃到第二夏娃，或者没有塞梅莱的泰雷西亚","authors":"Eric B. Song","doi":"10.1353/MLT.2018.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This article argues that Milton's rewriting of the Ovidian story of Narcissus in Paradise Lost and his brief mention of Tiresias should be understood alongside his conspicuous avoidance of the story of Semele. Milton only partly resembles Tiresias as he reorients the fate of Eve-as-Narcissus because he disavows knowledge of female sexual enjoyment. Such knowledge would trouble Milton's theological imagination by raising difficult questions about the contact between God and the second Eve, Mary.","PeriodicalId":42710,"journal":{"name":"Milton Studies","volume":"60 1","pages":"53 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/MLT.2018.0012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From First to Second Eve, or, Tiresias without Semele\",\"authors\":\"Eric B. Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/MLT.2018.0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:This article argues that Milton's rewriting of the Ovidian story of Narcissus in Paradise Lost and his brief mention of Tiresias should be understood alongside his conspicuous avoidance of the story of Semele. Milton only partly resembles Tiresias as he reorients the fate of Eve-as-Narcissus because he disavows knowledge of female sexual enjoyment. Such knowledge would trouble Milton's theological imagination by raising difficult questions about the contact between God and the second Eve, Mary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Milton Studies\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"53 - 74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/MLT.2018.0012\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Milton Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/MLT.2018.0012\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"POETRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Milton Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/MLT.2018.0012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

文摘：本文认为，弥尔顿在《失乐园》中改写了奥维德时代的纳西索斯故事，并简短地提到了蒂瑞西亚斯，这应该与他明显回避塞梅尔的故事同时理解。米尔顿在一定程度上与蒂瑞西亚斯相似，他将夏娃的命运重新定位为纳西索斯，因为他否认了女性性享受的知识。这些知识会给弥尔顿的神学想象带来麻烦，因为它提出了关于上帝和第二个夏娃玛丽之间联系的难题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

From First to Second Eve, or, Tiresias without Semele

abstract:This article argues that Milton's rewriting of the Ovidian story of Narcissus in Paradise Lost and his brief mention of Tiresias should be understood alongside his conspicuous avoidance of the story of Semele. Milton only partly resembles Tiresias as he reorients the fate of Eve-as-Narcissus because he disavows knowledge of female sexual enjoyment. Such knowledge would trouble Milton's theological imagination by raising difficult questions about the contact between God and the second Eve, Mary.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Milton Studies POETRY-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

50.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Milton Studies is published annually by the University of Pittsburgh Press as a forum for Milton scholarship and criticism.