{"title":"印度尼西亚英语学习者的会话含义理解策略","authors":"Hendi Pratama, F. Rokhman, S. Urip","doi":"10.17250/khisli.36.3.201912.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pratama, Hendi, Fathur Rokhman, and Sri Rejeki Urip. 2019. Conversational implicature comprehension strategies used by English learners in Indonesia. Linguistic Research 36(3), 415-458. Comprehension of conversational implicature is relatively easy for native speakers. However, the same degree of ease does not apply to second language learners. This study aims to uncover the strategies of second language learners despite the difficulties they face. Eighteen respondents are invited to join think-aloud protocols (TAP sessions). During the TAP sessions, respondents are instructed to answer thirty written questions assessing conversational implicature and, at the same time, asked to narrate their thoughts out loud during the session. The responses during these sessions are recorded and transcribed. The data is then codified and analyzed using receptive strategy categorization developed by Vandergrift (1997). The results of the analysis lead to clues on how second language learners, in general, strategize to understand conversational implicature. This study also reveals the difference between strategies used by learners with high implicature scores and those used by learners with low implicature scores. (Universitas Negeri Semarang)","PeriodicalId":43095,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Research","volume":"36 1","pages":"415-458"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conversational implicature comprehension strategies used by English learners in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Hendi Pratama, F. Rokhman, S. Urip\",\"doi\":\"10.17250/khisli.36.3.201912.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pratama, Hendi, Fathur Rokhman, and Sri Rejeki Urip. 2019. Conversational implicature comprehension strategies used by English learners in Indonesia. Linguistic Research 36(3), 415-458. Comprehension of conversational implicature is relatively easy for native speakers. However, the same degree of ease does not apply to second language learners. This study aims to uncover the strategies of second language learners despite the difficulties they face. Eighteen respondents are invited to join think-aloud protocols (TAP sessions). During the TAP sessions, respondents are instructed to answer thirty written questions assessing conversational implicature and, at the same time, asked to narrate their thoughts out loud during the session. The responses during these sessions are recorded and transcribed. The data is then codified and analyzed using receptive strategy categorization developed by Vandergrift (1997). The results of the analysis lead to clues on how second language learners, in general, strategize to understand conversational implicature. This study also reveals the difference between strategies used by learners with high implicature scores and those used by learners with low implicature scores. (Universitas Negeri Semarang)\",\"PeriodicalId\":43095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic Research\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"415-458\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1092\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17250/khisli.36.3.201912.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17250/khisli.36.3.201912.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
Pratama, Hendi, father Rokhman和Sri Rejeki Urip, 2019。印度尼西亚英语学习者的会话含义理解策略。语言学研究36(3),415-458。以英语为母语的人相对容易理解会话含义。然而,同样的轻松程度并不适用于第二语言学习者。本研究旨在揭示第二语言学习者在面对困难时所采取的策略。18位应答者被邀请参加出声思考协议(TAP会话)。在TAP会议期间,受访者被要求回答30个书面问题,评估会话的含义,同时,要求在会议期间大声叙述他们的想法。在这些会议期间的反应被记录和转录。然后使用Vandergrift(1997)开发的接受策略分类对数据进行编纂和分析。分析的结果为第二语言学习者通常如何制定策略来理解会话含义提供了线索。本研究还揭示了高含意学习者与低含意学习者使用策略的差异。(三宝垄大学)
Conversational implicature comprehension strategies used by English learners in Indonesia
Pratama, Hendi, Fathur Rokhman, and Sri Rejeki Urip. 2019. Conversational implicature comprehension strategies used by English learners in Indonesia. Linguistic Research 36(3), 415-458. Comprehension of conversational implicature is relatively easy for native speakers. However, the same degree of ease does not apply to second language learners. This study aims to uncover the strategies of second language learners despite the difficulties they face. Eighteen respondents are invited to join think-aloud protocols (TAP sessions). During the TAP sessions, respondents are instructed to answer thirty written questions assessing conversational implicature and, at the same time, asked to narrate their thoughts out loud during the session. The responses during these sessions are recorded and transcribed. The data is then codified and analyzed using receptive strategy categorization developed by Vandergrift (1997). The results of the analysis lead to clues on how second language learners, in general, strategize to understand conversational implicature. This study also reveals the difference between strategies used by learners with high implicature scores and those used by learners with low implicature scores. (Universitas Negeri Semarang)
期刊介绍:
Linguistic Research is an international journal which offers a forum for the discussion of theoretical research dealing with natural language data. The journal publishes articles of high quality which make a clear contribution to current debate in all branches of theoretical linguistics. The journal embraces both synchronic and diachronic perspectives, and carries articles that address language-specific as well as cross-linguistic and typological research questions. The journal features syntax, semantics, morphology, phonology, phonetics, and pragmatics and is currently published quarterly (March, June, September, and December), including the special September issue with a particular focus on applied linguistics covering (second) language acquisition, ESL/EFL, conversation/discourse analysis, etc. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial evaluation by the Editors, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to double-blind peer review by independent expert referees.