自由女权主义与后殖民差异:法国、荷兰和德国头巾之争

IF 1 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
A. Korteweg, G. Yurdakul
{"title":"自由女权主义与后殖民差异:法国、荷兰和德国头巾之争","authors":"A. Korteweg, G. Yurdakul","doi":"10.1177/0037768620974268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we analyze headscarf debates that unfolded in the first decade of the twenty-first century in France, the Netherlands, and Germany. Through a socio-historical overview looking at newspaper articles and policy and legal documents, we show how the headscarf has become a site for negotiating immigrant-related, postcolonial difference. We argue that certain feminist understanding of gender liberation and postcolonial difference in the headscarf debates reveal the continuity of control mechanisms from the colonial to the postcolonial era. We highlight the possibilities for decolonial thought and practice by centering the situatedness of headscarf. This allows us to show how Muslim citizens are active participants in producing contemporary Western European histories even as some of their practices face overt rejection.","PeriodicalId":46442,"journal":{"name":"Social Compass","volume":"68 1","pages":"410 - 429"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0037768620974268","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liberal feminism and postcolonial difference: Debating headscarves in France, the Netherlands, and Germany\",\"authors\":\"A. Korteweg, G. Yurdakul\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0037768620974268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, we analyze headscarf debates that unfolded in the first decade of the twenty-first century in France, the Netherlands, and Germany. Through a socio-historical overview looking at newspaper articles and policy and legal documents, we show how the headscarf has become a site for negotiating immigrant-related, postcolonial difference. We argue that certain feminist understanding of gender liberation and postcolonial difference in the headscarf debates reveal the continuity of control mechanisms from the colonial to the postcolonial era. We highlight the possibilities for decolonial thought and practice by centering the situatedness of headscarf. This allows us to show how Muslim citizens are active participants in producing contemporary Western European histories even as some of their practices face overt rejection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Compass\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"410 - 429\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0037768620974268\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768620974268\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Compass","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768620974268","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

在这篇文章中,我们分析了21世纪头十年在法国、荷兰和德国展开的关于头巾的辩论。通过对报纸文章、政策和法律文件的社会历史概述,我们展示了头巾如何成为谈判移民相关后殖民差异的场所。我们认为,在头巾辩论中,女权主义对性别解放和后殖民差异的某些理解揭示了从殖民时代到后殖民时代控制机制的连续性。我们以头巾的情境性为中心,强调非殖民化思想和实践的可能性。这使我们能够展示穆斯林公民是如何积极参与当代西欧历史的创作的,尽管他们的一些做法面临着公开的拒绝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Liberal feminism and postcolonial difference: Debating headscarves in France, the Netherlands, and Germany
In this article, we analyze headscarf debates that unfolded in the first decade of the twenty-first century in France, the Netherlands, and Germany. Through a socio-historical overview looking at newspaper articles and policy and legal documents, we show how the headscarf has become a site for negotiating immigrant-related, postcolonial difference. We argue that certain feminist understanding of gender liberation and postcolonial difference in the headscarf debates reveal the continuity of control mechanisms from the colonial to the postcolonial era. We highlight the possibilities for decolonial thought and practice by centering the situatedness of headscarf. This allows us to show how Muslim citizens are active participants in producing contemporary Western European histories even as some of their practices face overt rejection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Compass
Social Compass Multiple-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Social Compass is a fully peer reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles on the sociology of religion. It aims to reflect the wide variety of research being carried out by sociologists of religion in all countries. Part of each issue consists of invited articles on a particular theme; for the unthemed part of the journal, articles will be considered on any topic that bears upon religion in contemporary societies. Issue 2 each year contains selected papers from the biennial conferences of the International Society for the Sociology of Religion (ISSR). Readers are also invited to contribute to the Forum section.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信