{"title":"激光扫描仪采集人体测量数据的验证","authors":"M. Ladouceur, Ian A. Westhaver, J. Kozey","doi":"10.3233/OER-170257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Laser imaging provides an alternative to manual measurements in the collection of general anthropometric surveys focused on 1-D measures. This study aimed to develop a systematic method of comparing manual and digital anthropometric measurements and validate a commercial three-dimensional laser scanner for anthropometric measurements. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this preliminary project is to validate a laser scanner for selected length and girth measurements. METHODS: A variety of linear and circumferential segmental measures from 20 participants were either extracted from a 3D commercial laser imaging device scans or measured manually. Error between manual and scan-extracted measurements was compared based on ISO20685, and clinical standards. Regression analysis improved the quality of the measurements and residuals were again compared to the standards. RESULTS: After regression, 7 of the 9 the measurements were within, or close to (two times standard), standards. Error was caused by a combination of image quality issues associated with the laser scanner, as well as algorithmic issues associated with larger participants. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results are promising, and given the indicated population, a small number of minor improvements may very quickly allow the scanner to collect measurements on a clinical population.","PeriodicalId":91780,"journal":{"name":"Occupational ergonomics : the journal of the International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety","volume":"13 1","pages":"91-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/OER-170257","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of laser scanner for the collection of anthropometric measurement\",\"authors\":\"M. Ladouceur, Ian A. Westhaver, J. Kozey\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/OER-170257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Laser imaging provides an alternative to manual measurements in the collection of general anthropometric surveys focused on 1-D measures. This study aimed to develop a systematic method of comparing manual and digital anthropometric measurements and validate a commercial three-dimensional laser scanner for anthropometric measurements. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this preliminary project is to validate a laser scanner for selected length and girth measurements. METHODS: A variety of linear and circumferential segmental measures from 20 participants were either extracted from a 3D commercial laser imaging device scans or measured manually. Error between manual and scan-extracted measurements was compared based on ISO20685, and clinical standards. Regression analysis improved the quality of the measurements and residuals were again compared to the standards. RESULTS: After regression, 7 of the 9 the measurements were within, or close to (two times standard), standards. Error was caused by a combination of image quality issues associated with the laser scanner, as well as algorithmic issues associated with larger participants. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results are promising, and given the indicated population, a small number of minor improvements may very quickly allow the scanner to collect measurements on a clinical population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational ergonomics : the journal of the International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"91-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/OER-170257\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational ergonomics : the journal of the International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/OER-170257\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational ergonomics : the journal of the International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/OER-170257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of laser scanner for the collection of anthropometric measurement
BACKGROUND: Laser imaging provides an alternative to manual measurements in the collection of general anthropometric surveys focused on 1-D measures. This study aimed to develop a systematic method of comparing manual and digital anthropometric measurements and validate a commercial three-dimensional laser scanner for anthropometric measurements. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this preliminary project is to validate a laser scanner for selected length and girth measurements. METHODS: A variety of linear and circumferential segmental measures from 20 participants were either extracted from a 3D commercial laser imaging device scans or measured manually. Error between manual and scan-extracted measurements was compared based on ISO20685, and clinical standards. Regression analysis improved the quality of the measurements and residuals were again compared to the standards. RESULTS: After regression, 7 of the 9 the measurements were within, or close to (two times standard), standards. Error was caused by a combination of image quality issues associated with the laser scanner, as well as algorithmic issues associated with larger participants. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results are promising, and given the indicated population, a small number of minor improvements may very quickly allow the scanner to collect measurements on a clinical population.