激光扫描仪采集人体测量数据的验证

M. Ladouceur, Ian A. Westhaver, J. Kozey
{"title":"激光扫描仪采集人体测量数据的验证","authors":"M. Ladouceur, Ian A. Westhaver, J. Kozey","doi":"10.3233/OER-170257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Laser imaging provides an alternative to manual measurements in the collection of general anthropometric surveys focused on 1-D measures. This study aimed to develop a systematic method of comparing manual and digital anthropometric measurements and validate a commercial three-dimensional laser scanner for anthropometric measurements. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this preliminary project is to validate a laser scanner for selected length and girth measurements. METHODS: A variety of linear and circumferential segmental measures from 20 participants were either extracted from a 3D commercial laser imaging device scans or measured manually. Error between manual and scan-extracted measurements was compared based on ISO20685, and clinical standards. Regression analysis improved the quality of the measurements and residuals were again compared to the standards. RESULTS: After regression, 7 of the 9 the measurements were within, or close to (two times standard), standards. Error was caused by a combination of image quality issues associated with the laser scanner, as well as algorithmic issues associated with larger participants. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results are promising, and given the indicated population, a small number of minor improvements may very quickly allow the scanner to collect measurements on a clinical population.","PeriodicalId":91780,"journal":{"name":"Occupational ergonomics : the journal of the International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety","volume":"13 1","pages":"91-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/OER-170257","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of laser scanner for the collection of anthropometric measurement\",\"authors\":\"M. Ladouceur, Ian A. Westhaver, J. Kozey\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/OER-170257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Laser imaging provides an alternative to manual measurements in the collection of general anthropometric surveys focused on 1-D measures. This study aimed to develop a systematic method of comparing manual and digital anthropometric measurements and validate a commercial three-dimensional laser scanner for anthropometric measurements. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this preliminary project is to validate a laser scanner for selected length and girth measurements. METHODS: A variety of linear and circumferential segmental measures from 20 participants were either extracted from a 3D commercial laser imaging device scans or measured manually. Error between manual and scan-extracted measurements was compared based on ISO20685, and clinical standards. Regression analysis improved the quality of the measurements and residuals were again compared to the standards. RESULTS: After regression, 7 of the 9 the measurements were within, or close to (two times standard), standards. Error was caused by a combination of image quality issues associated with the laser scanner, as well as algorithmic issues associated with larger participants. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results are promising, and given the indicated population, a small number of minor improvements may very quickly allow the scanner to collect measurements on a clinical population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational ergonomics : the journal of the International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"91-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/OER-170257\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational ergonomics : the journal of the International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/OER-170257\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational ergonomics : the journal of the International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/OER-170257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:在专注于一维测量的一般人体测量调查中,激光成像提供了手动测量的替代方案。本研究旨在开发一种比较手动和数字人体测量的系统方法,并验证用于人体测量的商业三维激光扫描仪。目的:本初步项目的目的是验证激光扫描仪用于选定的长度和周长测量。方法:20名参与者的各种线性和周向节段测量要么从3D商业激光成像设备扫描中提取,要么手动测量。根据ISO20685和临床标准,比较手动测量和扫描提取测量之间的误差。回归分析提高了测量的质量,并再次将残差与标准进行比较。结果:回归后,9个测量值中有7个在标准范围内或接近(两倍标准)。错误是由与激光扫描仪相关的图像质量问题以及与较大参与者相关的算法问题共同造成的。结论:总的来说,结果是有希望的,考虑到指定的人群,少量的微小改进可能会很快使扫描仪能够收集临床人群的测量结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of laser scanner for the collection of anthropometric measurement
BACKGROUND: Laser imaging provides an alternative to manual measurements in the collection of general anthropometric surveys focused on 1-D measures. This study aimed to develop a systematic method of comparing manual and digital anthropometric measurements and validate a commercial three-dimensional laser scanner for anthropometric measurements. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this preliminary project is to validate a laser scanner for selected length and girth measurements. METHODS: A variety of linear and circumferential segmental measures from 20 participants were either extracted from a 3D commercial laser imaging device scans or measured manually. Error between manual and scan-extracted measurements was compared based on ISO20685, and clinical standards. Regression analysis improved the quality of the measurements and residuals were again compared to the standards. RESULTS: After regression, 7 of the 9 the measurements were within, or close to (two times standard), standards. Error was caused by a combination of image quality issues associated with the laser scanner, as well as algorithmic issues associated with larger participants. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results are promising, and given the indicated population, a small number of minor improvements may very quickly allow the scanner to collect measurements on a clinical population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信