和平与冲突研究中的时间性和语境化:战争回忆录和个人日记被遗忘的价值

IF 1.9 2区社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Cooperation and Conflict Pub Date : 2021-10-21 DOI:10.1177/00108367211027605

Roger Mac Ginty

{"title":"和平与冲突研究中的时间性和语境化:战争回忆录和个人日记被遗忘的价值","authors":"Roger Mac Ginty","doi":"10.1177/00108367211027605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article contributes to debates on appropriate levels of analysis, temporality, and the utility of fieldwork in relation to Peace and Conflict Studies (PCS), and International Relations more generally. It observes a recentism or privileging of the recent past in our studies and a consequent overlooking of the longer term. As a corrective, the article investigates the extent to which wartime memoirs and personal diaries (specifically from World War I and World War II) can help inform the study of contemporary peace and conflict. In essence, the article is a reflection on the epistemologies and methodologies employed by PCS and an investigation of the need for greater contextualisation.","PeriodicalId":47286,"journal":{"name":"Cooperation and Conflict","volume":"57 1","pages":"191 - 209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporality and contextualisation in Peace and Conflict Studies: The forgotten value of war memoirs and personal diaries\",\"authors\":\"Roger Mac Ginty\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00108367211027605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article contributes to debates on appropriate levels of analysis, temporality, and the utility of fieldwork in relation to Peace and Conflict Studies (PCS), and International Relations more generally. It observes a recentism or privileging of the recent past in our studies and a consequent overlooking of the longer term. As a corrective, the article investigates the extent to which wartime memoirs and personal diaries (specifically from World War I and World War II) can help inform the study of contemporary peace and conflict. In essence, the article is a reflection on the epistemologies and methodologies employed by PCS and an investigation of the need for greater contextualisation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cooperation and Conflict\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"191 - 209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cooperation and Conflict\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00108367211027605\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cooperation and Conflict","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00108367211027605","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

摘要

这篇文章有助于就和平与冲突研究（PCS）以及更广泛的国际关系中的适当分析水平、时间性和实地调查的效用进行辩论。在我们的研究中，它观察到了对最近过去的一种最近主义或特权主义，以及由此产生的对长期的忽视。作为纠正，本文调查了战时回忆录和个人日记（特别是第一次世界大战和第二次世界大战的回忆录）在多大程度上有助于为当代和平与冲突的研究提供信息。本质上，这篇文章是对PCS所使用的认识论和方法论的反思，也是对更大语境化需求的调查。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Temporality and contextualisation in Peace and Conflict Studies: The forgotten value of war memoirs and personal diaries

This article contributes to debates on appropriate levels of analysis, temporality, and the utility of fieldwork in relation to Peace and Conflict Studies (PCS), and International Relations more generally. It observes a recentism or privileging of the recent past in our studies and a consequent overlooking of the longer term. As a corrective, the article investigates the extent to which wartime memoirs and personal diaries (specifically from World War I and World War II) can help inform the study of contemporary peace and conflict. In essence, the article is a reflection on the epistemologies and methodologies employed by PCS and an investigation of the need for greater contextualisation.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Cooperation and Conflict Multiple-

CiteScore

4.10

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Published for over 40 years, the aim of Cooperation and Conflict is to promote research on and understanding of international relations. It believes in the deeds of academic pluralism and thus does not represent any specific methodology, approach, tradition or school. The mission of the journal is to meet the demands of the scholarly community having an interest in international studies (for details, see the statement "From the Editors" in Vol. 40, No. 3, September 2005). The editors especially encourage submissions contributing new knowledge of the field and welcome innovative, theory-aware and critical approaches. First preference will continue to be given to articles that have a Nordic and European focus. Cooperation and Conflict strictly adheres to a double-blind reviewing policy.