“公平竞争环境”的隐喻:揭示欧盟自由贸易协定中的竞争举措

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q3 ECONOMICS
M. Gillis
{"title":"“公平竞争环境”的隐喻:揭示欧盟自由贸易协定中的竞争举措","authors":"M. Gillis","doi":"10.54648/trad2023004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Union’s (EU’s) ‘New Generation’ Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) often contain ‘level playing field’ obligations. ‘Level playing field’ obligations, in this context, are minimum, reciprocal obligations usually with respect to taxation, state-aid, and both labour and environmental standards. This short article is not so much concerned with these obligations or their effect, as it is with the use of the ‘level playing field’ metaphor to describe them, specifically in the context of labour and environmental standards. Through an examination of the actual usage, meaning and context of the level playing field metaphor, the article analyses and rejects arguments that a commitment to a level playing field in fact indicates a change on the part of states away from ‘free’ trade to ‘fair’. Rather, it demonstrates that the level playing field metaphor, at least in the context of EU FTAs, in fact functions as a kind of linguistic disguise for a competitive move in trade agreements.\nLevel Playing Field, EU Trade, Free Trade Agreements, Free Trade, Fair Trade, Sustainabilty, Labour, Environment, Metaphor, Cognitive Metaphor Theory","PeriodicalId":46019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Trade","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ‘Level Playing Field’ Metaphor: Revealing a Competitive Move in EU Free Trade Agreements\",\"authors\":\"M. Gillis\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/trad2023004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The European Union’s (EU’s) ‘New Generation’ Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) often contain ‘level playing field’ obligations. ‘Level playing field’ obligations, in this context, are minimum, reciprocal obligations usually with respect to taxation, state-aid, and both labour and environmental standards. This short article is not so much concerned with these obligations or their effect, as it is with the use of the ‘level playing field’ metaphor to describe them, specifically in the context of labour and environmental standards. Through an examination of the actual usage, meaning and context of the level playing field metaphor, the article analyses and rejects arguments that a commitment to a level playing field in fact indicates a change on the part of states away from ‘free’ trade to ‘fair’. Rather, it demonstrates that the level playing field metaphor, at least in the context of EU FTAs, in fact functions as a kind of linguistic disguise for a competitive move in trade agreements.\\nLevel Playing Field, EU Trade, Free Trade Agreements, Free Trade, Fair Trade, Sustainabilty, Labour, Environment, Metaphor, Cognitive Metaphor Theory\",\"PeriodicalId\":46019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of World Trade\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of World Trade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2023004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Trade","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2023004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧盟(EU)的“新一代”自由贸易协定(fta)通常包含“公平竞争”的义务。在这种情况下,“公平竞争环境”义务是最低限度的互惠义务,通常涉及税收、国家援助以及劳工和环境标准。这篇短文不太关注这些义务或它们的影响,而是使用“公平竞争环境”的比喻来描述它们,特别是在劳工和环境标准的背景下。通过对公平竞争环境比喻的实际用法、意义和上下文的考察,文章分析并驳斥了这样的论点,即对公平竞争环境的承诺实际上表明了国家从“自由”贸易向“公平”贸易的转变。相反,它表明,公平竞争环境的隐喻,至少在欧盟自由贸易协定的背景下,实际上是贸易协定中竞争举措的一种语言伪装。公平竞争环境,欧盟贸易,自由贸易协定,自由贸易,公平贸易,可持续性,劳工,环境,隐喻,认知隐喻理论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The ‘Level Playing Field’ Metaphor: Revealing a Competitive Move in EU Free Trade Agreements
The European Union’s (EU’s) ‘New Generation’ Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) often contain ‘level playing field’ obligations. ‘Level playing field’ obligations, in this context, are minimum, reciprocal obligations usually with respect to taxation, state-aid, and both labour and environmental standards. This short article is not so much concerned with these obligations or their effect, as it is with the use of the ‘level playing field’ metaphor to describe them, specifically in the context of labour and environmental standards. Through an examination of the actual usage, meaning and context of the level playing field metaphor, the article analyses and rejects arguments that a commitment to a level playing field in fact indicates a change on the part of states away from ‘free’ trade to ‘fair’. Rather, it demonstrates that the level playing field metaphor, at least in the context of EU FTAs, in fact functions as a kind of linguistic disguise for a competitive move in trade agreements. Level Playing Field, EU Trade, Free Trade Agreements, Free Trade, Fair Trade, Sustainabilty, Labour, Environment, Metaphor, Cognitive Metaphor Theory
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Far and away the most thought-provoking and informative journal in its field, the Journal of World Trade sets the agenda for both scholarship and policy initiatives in this most critical area of international relations. It is the only journal which deals authoritatively with the most crucial issues affecting world trade today.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信