测试元启发式优化算法的性能度量和工具

Q4 Chemical Engineering
F. Schott, D. Chamoret, T. Baron, Sébastien Salmon, Y. Meyer
{"title":"测试元启发式优化算法的性能度量和工具","authors":"F. Schott, D. Chamoret, T. Baron, Sébastien Salmon, Y. Meyer","doi":"10.22055/JACM.2021.37664.3060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last decade, many new algorithms have been proposed to solve optimization problems. Most of them are meta-heuristic algorithms. The issue of accurate performance measure of algorithms is still under discussion in the scientific community. Therefore, a new scoring strategy via a new benchmark is proposed. The idea of this new tool is to determine a score, a measure of efficiency taking into account both the end value of the optimization and the convergence speed. This measure is based on an aggregate of statistical results of different optimization problems. These problems are judiciously chosen to cover as broad a spectrum of resolution configurations as possible. They are defined by combinations of several parameters: dimensions, objective functions and evaluation limit on dimension ratios. Aggregation methods are chosen and set in order to make the problem weight relevant according to the computed score. This scoring strategy is compared to the CEC one thanks to the results of different algorithms: PSO, CMAES, Genetic Algorithm, Cuttlefish and simulated annealing.","PeriodicalId":37801,"journal":{"name":"Applied and Computational Mechanics","volume":"7 1","pages":"1803-1813"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance measure and tool for benchmarking metaheuristic optimization algorithms\",\"authors\":\"F. Schott, D. Chamoret, T. Baron, Sébastien Salmon, Y. Meyer\",\"doi\":\"10.22055/JACM.2021.37664.3060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the last decade, many new algorithms have been proposed to solve optimization problems. Most of them are meta-heuristic algorithms. The issue of accurate performance measure of algorithms is still under discussion in the scientific community. Therefore, a new scoring strategy via a new benchmark is proposed. The idea of this new tool is to determine a score, a measure of efficiency taking into account both the end value of the optimization and the convergence speed. This measure is based on an aggregate of statistical results of different optimization problems. These problems are judiciously chosen to cover as broad a spectrum of resolution configurations as possible. They are defined by combinations of several parameters: dimensions, objective functions and evaluation limit on dimension ratios. Aggregation methods are chosen and set in order to make the problem weight relevant according to the computed score. This scoring strategy is compared to the CEC one thanks to the results of different algorithms: PSO, CMAES, Genetic Algorithm, Cuttlefish and simulated annealing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied and Computational Mechanics\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"1803-1813\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied and Computational Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22055/JACM.2021.37664.3060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Chemical Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied and Computational Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22055/JACM.2021.37664.3060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Chemical Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去的十年里,人们提出了许多新的算法来解决优化问题。它们大多是元启发式算法。算法的准确性能度量问题仍在科学界讨论中。因此,提出了一种新的基于新基准的评分策略。这个新工具的想法是确定一个分数,这是一种考虑优化最终值和收敛速度的效率衡量标准。该度量基于不同优化问题的统计结果的集合。明智地选择这些问题以覆盖尽可能广泛的分辨率配置。它们是由几个参数的组合定义的:维度、目标函数和维度比率的评估极限。选择和设置聚合方法,以便根据计算的分数使问题权重相关。由于不同算法的结果,该评分策略与CEC评分策略进行了比较:PSO、CMAES、遗传算法、Cuttlefish和模拟退火。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance measure and tool for benchmarking metaheuristic optimization algorithms
In the last decade, many new algorithms have been proposed to solve optimization problems. Most of them are meta-heuristic algorithms. The issue of accurate performance measure of algorithms is still under discussion in the scientific community. Therefore, a new scoring strategy via a new benchmark is proposed. The idea of this new tool is to determine a score, a measure of efficiency taking into account both the end value of the optimization and the convergence speed. This measure is based on an aggregate of statistical results of different optimization problems. These problems are judiciously chosen to cover as broad a spectrum of resolution configurations as possible. They are defined by combinations of several parameters: dimensions, objective functions and evaluation limit on dimension ratios. Aggregation methods are chosen and set in order to make the problem weight relevant according to the computed score. This scoring strategy is compared to the CEC one thanks to the results of different algorithms: PSO, CMAES, Genetic Algorithm, Cuttlefish and simulated annealing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied and Computational Mechanics
Applied and Computational Mechanics Engineering-Computational Mechanics
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The ACM journal covers a broad spectrum of topics in all fields of applied and computational mechanics with special emphasis on mathematical modelling and numerical simulations with experimental support, if relevant. Our audience is the international scientific community, academics as well as engineers interested in such disciplines. Original research papers falling into the following areas are considered for possible publication: solid mechanics, mechanics of materials, thermodynamics, biomechanics and mechanobiology, fluid-structure interaction, dynamics of multibody systems, mechatronics, vibrations and waves, reliability and durability of structures, structural damage and fracture mechanics, heterogenous media and multiscale problems, structural mechanics, experimental methods in mechanics. This list is neither exhaustive nor fixed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信