胃肠道肿瘤患者营养评估中的预后营养指数和患者主观整体评估的价值

Jiangyan Wei, Hongxia Yan, Qi Li
{"title":"胃肠道肿瘤患者营养评估中的预后营养指数和患者主观整体评估的价值","authors":"Jiangyan Wei, Hongxia Yan, Qi Li","doi":"10.34175/jno202103005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Objective To compare the value and consistency among the Patient Generated -Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and the Prognostic Nutrition Index (PNI) for assessing nutritional status in gastrointestinal tumor patients. Methods 251 patients from gastric cancer surgical ward from January 2019 to January 2020 were recruited through convenience sampling in this respective study. Nutritional screening and assessment were conducted for 251 gastrointestinal tumor patients using the nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS 2002) PG-SGA, and the PNI. PNI was calculated using the serum albumin level and the total lymphocyte count obtained from the patients’ routine laboratory examination when they were admitted to the hospital. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) of the PG-SGA and the PNI were plotted with the NRS 2002 used as the gold standard, and the diagnostic value of the PG-SGA and PNI was reflected by the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and Youden index. We then determined the optimal cut-off for the PNI and tested the consistency of the PG-SGA and PNI. Results The optimal cut-off point for the PNI was calculated to be 50.78. The AUC of the PG-SGA was 0.908 (95% CI 0.871-0.944). The sensitivity was 89.9%, specificity was 76.2% and the Youden index was 0.661. The AUC of the PNI was 0.594 (95% CI 0.516-0.572). The sensitivity was 73.8%, specificity was 44.3% and the Youden index was 0.181. In the consistency test, the kappa value was 0.838 (P < 0.001). Conclusion The PNI is of limited value for assessing malnutrition, although it did have good consistency with the PG-SGA. The combination of the PNI and PG-SGA can be used for diagnosing assessing malnutrition in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":64349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutritional Oncology","volume":"6 1","pages":"134 - 139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Values of the Prognostic Nutrition Index and the Patient Generated -Subjective Global Assessment during the Nutritional Assessment of Patients with Gastrointestinal Tumors\",\"authors\":\"Jiangyan Wei, Hongxia Yan, Qi Li\",\"doi\":\"10.34175/jno202103005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: Objective To compare the value and consistency among the Patient Generated -Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and the Prognostic Nutrition Index (PNI) for assessing nutritional status in gastrointestinal tumor patients. Methods 251 patients from gastric cancer surgical ward from January 2019 to January 2020 were recruited through convenience sampling in this respective study. Nutritional screening and assessment were conducted for 251 gastrointestinal tumor patients using the nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS 2002) PG-SGA, and the PNI. PNI was calculated using the serum albumin level and the total lymphocyte count obtained from the patients’ routine laboratory examination when they were admitted to the hospital. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) of the PG-SGA and the PNI were plotted with the NRS 2002 used as the gold standard, and the diagnostic value of the PG-SGA and PNI was reflected by the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and Youden index. We then determined the optimal cut-off for the PNI and tested the consistency of the PG-SGA and PNI. Results The optimal cut-off point for the PNI was calculated to be 50.78. The AUC of the PG-SGA was 0.908 (95% CI 0.871-0.944). The sensitivity was 89.9%, specificity was 76.2% and the Youden index was 0.661. The AUC of the PNI was 0.594 (95% CI 0.516-0.572). The sensitivity was 73.8%, specificity was 44.3% and the Youden index was 0.181. In the consistency test, the kappa value was 0.838 (P < 0.001). Conclusion The PNI is of limited value for assessing malnutrition, although it did have good consistency with the PG-SGA. The combination of the PNI and PG-SGA can be used for diagnosing assessing malnutrition in clinical practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":64349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutritional Oncology\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"134 - 139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutritional Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34175/jno202103005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutritional Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34175/jno202103005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:目的比较患者生成-主观整体评估(PG-SGA)和预后营养指数(PNI)在胃肠道肿瘤患者营养状况评估中的价值和一致性。方法采用方便抽样的方法,对2019年1月至2020年1月癌症外科251例患者进行调查。使用营养风险筛查2002(NRS 2002)PG-SGA和PNI对251名胃肠道肿瘤患者进行了营养筛查和评估。PNI是使用患者入院时的血清白蛋白水平和从常规实验室检查中获得的总淋巴细胞计数来计算的。PG-SGA和PNI的受试者工作特性(ROC)以NRS 2002作为金标准绘制,PG-SGA的诊断价值由曲线下面积(AUC)、灵敏度、特异性和Youden指数反映。然后,我们确定了PNI的最佳截止值,并测试了PG-SGA和PNI的一致性。结果PNI的最佳截止点为50.78。PG-SGA的AUC为0.908(95%CI 0.871-0.944),敏感性为89.9%,特异性为76.2%,Youden指数为0.661。PNI的AUC为0.594(95%CI为0.516-0.572),敏感性为73.8%,特异性为44.3%,Youden指数为0.181。在一致性检验中,kappa值为0.838(P<0.001)。结论PNI对评估营养不良的价值有限,尽管它与PG-SGA具有良好的一致性。PNI和PG-SGA的组合可用于临床实践中营养不良的诊断和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Values of the Prognostic Nutrition Index and the Patient Generated -Subjective Global Assessment during the Nutritional Assessment of Patients with Gastrointestinal Tumors
Abstract: Objective To compare the value and consistency among the Patient Generated -Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and the Prognostic Nutrition Index (PNI) for assessing nutritional status in gastrointestinal tumor patients. Methods 251 patients from gastric cancer surgical ward from January 2019 to January 2020 were recruited through convenience sampling in this respective study. Nutritional screening and assessment were conducted for 251 gastrointestinal tumor patients using the nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS 2002) PG-SGA, and the PNI. PNI was calculated using the serum albumin level and the total lymphocyte count obtained from the patients’ routine laboratory examination when they were admitted to the hospital. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) of the PG-SGA and the PNI were plotted with the NRS 2002 used as the gold standard, and the diagnostic value of the PG-SGA and PNI was reflected by the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and Youden index. We then determined the optimal cut-off for the PNI and tested the consistency of the PG-SGA and PNI. Results The optimal cut-off point for the PNI was calculated to be 50.78. The AUC of the PG-SGA was 0.908 (95% CI 0.871-0.944). The sensitivity was 89.9%, specificity was 76.2% and the Youden index was 0.661. The AUC of the PNI was 0.594 (95% CI 0.516-0.572). The sensitivity was 73.8%, specificity was 44.3% and the Youden index was 0.181. In the consistency test, the kappa value was 0.838 (P < 0.001). Conclusion The PNI is of limited value for assessing malnutrition, although it did have good consistency with the PG-SGA. The combination of the PNI and PG-SGA can be used for diagnosing assessing malnutrition in clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
154
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信