黄昏之争:冷战教会我们今天的大国竞争

IF 0.4 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Liliane Stadler
{"title":"黄昏之争:冷战教会我们今天的大国竞争","authors":"Liliane Stadler","doi":"10.1080/14682745.2022.2077988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cold War security order that included Russia could have decreased tensions between the world’s two nuclear superpowersthereby decreasing tensions for all of Europe’ (p. 195). Alternatively, Mark Trachtenberg in his curiously under-cited commentary on NATO enlargement makes an ostensibly controversial remark: ‘historical analysis in itself cannot really answer the fundamental question of how the policy of NATO expansion is to be assessed, and it is not the historian’s business in any event to sit in judgment on the past’. Sarotte’s historiographical judgment furthers debate on the perpetual question of a contemporary historians’ moral and political responsibilities when bringing the past into the present. Not One Inch is a substantial addition in Sarotte’s unofficial trilogy (1989; The Collapse: The Accidental Opening of the Berlin Wall) and fortifies her legacy as a pathbreaking historian of the end of the Cold War and the post-Cold War period. The historiography of the 1990s is indebted to the groundwork she has laid. As knowledge production on post-Cold War European security plays an increasing role in contemporary political debates, it is important that historians of the 1990s ruminate on the imprint politics and morality may leave on the emerging historiography.","PeriodicalId":46099,"journal":{"name":"Cold War History","volume":"23 1","pages":"212 - 215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The twilight struggle: what the Cold War teaches us about Great Power rivalry today\",\"authors\":\"Liliane Stadler\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14682745.2022.2077988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cold War security order that included Russia could have decreased tensions between the world’s two nuclear superpowersthereby decreasing tensions for all of Europe’ (p. 195). Alternatively, Mark Trachtenberg in his curiously under-cited commentary on NATO enlargement makes an ostensibly controversial remark: ‘historical analysis in itself cannot really answer the fundamental question of how the policy of NATO expansion is to be assessed, and it is not the historian’s business in any event to sit in judgment on the past’. Sarotte’s historiographical judgment furthers debate on the perpetual question of a contemporary historians’ moral and political responsibilities when bringing the past into the present. Not One Inch is a substantial addition in Sarotte’s unofficial trilogy (1989; The Collapse: The Accidental Opening of the Berlin Wall) and fortifies her legacy as a pathbreaking historian of the end of the Cold War and the post-Cold War period. The historiography of the 1990s is indebted to the groundwork she has laid. As knowledge production on post-Cold War European security plays an increasing role in contemporary political debates, it is important that historians of the 1990s ruminate on the imprint politics and morality may leave on the emerging historiography.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cold War History\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"212 - 215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cold War History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14682745.2022.2077988\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cold War History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14682745.2022.2077988","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

包括俄罗斯在内的冷战安全秩序本可以通过缓解整个欧洲的紧张局势来缓解世界上两个核超级大国之间的紧张局势”(第195页)。或者,马克·特拉赫滕贝格(Mark Trachtenberg)在其关于北约扩大的评论中发表了一句表面上有争议的话:“历史分析本身并不能真正回答如何评估北约扩大政策的根本问题,历史学家无论如何都不应该对过去做出判断”。萨洛特的史学判断进一步推动了关于当代历史学家在将过去带入现在时的道德和政治责任这一永恒问题的辩论。《一寸都不是》是夏洛特非官方三部曲(1989年;《崩溃:柏林墙的意外打开》)的重要补充,巩固了她作为冷战结束和后冷战时期开拓性历史学家的遗产。20世纪90年代的史学得益于她所奠定的基础。随着冷战后欧洲安全的知识生产在当代政治辩论中发挥着越来越大的作用,20世纪90年代的历史学家反思政治和道德可能给新兴史学留下的印记是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The twilight struggle: what the Cold War teaches us about Great Power rivalry today
Cold War security order that included Russia could have decreased tensions between the world’s two nuclear superpowersthereby decreasing tensions for all of Europe’ (p. 195). Alternatively, Mark Trachtenberg in his curiously under-cited commentary on NATO enlargement makes an ostensibly controversial remark: ‘historical analysis in itself cannot really answer the fundamental question of how the policy of NATO expansion is to be assessed, and it is not the historian’s business in any event to sit in judgment on the past’. Sarotte’s historiographical judgment furthers debate on the perpetual question of a contemporary historians’ moral and political responsibilities when bringing the past into the present. Not One Inch is a substantial addition in Sarotte’s unofficial trilogy (1989; The Collapse: The Accidental Opening of the Berlin Wall) and fortifies her legacy as a pathbreaking historian of the end of the Cold War and the post-Cold War period. The historiography of the 1990s is indebted to the groundwork she has laid. As knowledge production on post-Cold War European security plays an increasing role in contemporary political debates, it is important that historians of the 1990s ruminate on the imprint politics and morality may leave on the emerging historiography.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cold War History
Cold War History Multiple-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信