使用深度学习预测泊松比的门控循环单元模型

IF 9.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Fahd Saeed Alakbari , Mysara Eissa Mohyaldinn , Mohammed Abdalla Ayoub , Ibnelwaleed A. Hussein , Ali Samer Muhsan , Syahrir Ridha , Abdullah Abduljabbar Salih
{"title":"使用深度学习预测泊松比的门控循环单元模型","authors":"Fahd Saeed Alakbari ,&nbsp;Mysara Eissa Mohyaldinn ,&nbsp;Mohammed Abdalla Ayoub ,&nbsp;Ibnelwaleed A. Hussein ,&nbsp;Ali Samer Muhsan ,&nbsp;Syahrir Ridha ,&nbsp;Abdullah Abduljabbar Salih","doi":"10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.04.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Static Poisson's ratio (<em>ν</em><sub>s</sub>) is crucial for determining geomechanical properties in petroleum applications, namely sand production. Some models have been used to predict <strong><em>ν</em></strong><sub>s</sub>; however, the published models were limited to specific data ranges with an average absolute percentage relative error (AAPRE) of more than 10%. The published gated recurrent unit (GRU) models do not consider trend analysis to show physical behaviors. In this study, we aim to develop a GRU model using trend analysis and three inputs for predicting <em>ν</em><sub>s</sub> based on a broad range of data, <em>ν</em><sub>s</sub> (value of 0.1627–0.4492), bulk formation density (RHOB) (0.315–2.994 g/mL), compressional time (DTc) (44.43–186.9 μs/ft), and shear time (DTs) (72.9–341.2 μs/ft). The GRU model was evaluated using different approaches, including statistical error analyses. The GRU model showed the proper trends, and the model data ranges were wider than previous ones. The GRU model has the largest correlation coefficient (<em>R</em>) of 0.967 and the lowest AAPRE, average percent relative error (APRE), root mean square error (RMSE), and standard deviation (SD) of 3.228%, −1.054%, 4.389, and 0.013, respectively, compared to other models. The GRU model has a high accuracy for the different datasets: training, validation, testing, and the whole datasets with <em>R</em> and AAPRE values were 0.981 and 2.601%, 0.966 and 3.274%, 0.967 and 3.228%, and 0.977 and 2.861%, respectively. The group error analyses of all inputs show that the GRU model has less than 5% AAPRE for all input ranges, which is superior to other models that have different AAPRE values of more than 10% at various ranges of inputs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54219,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering","volume":"16 1","pages":"Pages 123-135"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775523001555/pdfft?md5=ad9af7666bac5037c232b01b3220ac4a&pid=1-s2.0-S1674775523001555-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A gated recurrent unit model to predict Poisson's ratio using deep learning\",\"authors\":\"Fahd Saeed Alakbari ,&nbsp;Mysara Eissa Mohyaldinn ,&nbsp;Mohammed Abdalla Ayoub ,&nbsp;Ibnelwaleed A. Hussein ,&nbsp;Ali Samer Muhsan ,&nbsp;Syahrir Ridha ,&nbsp;Abdullah Abduljabbar Salih\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.04.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Static Poisson's ratio (<em>ν</em><sub>s</sub>) is crucial for determining geomechanical properties in petroleum applications, namely sand production. Some models have been used to predict <strong><em>ν</em></strong><sub>s</sub>; however, the published models were limited to specific data ranges with an average absolute percentage relative error (AAPRE) of more than 10%. The published gated recurrent unit (GRU) models do not consider trend analysis to show physical behaviors. In this study, we aim to develop a GRU model using trend analysis and three inputs for predicting <em>ν</em><sub>s</sub> based on a broad range of data, <em>ν</em><sub>s</sub> (value of 0.1627–0.4492), bulk formation density (RHOB) (0.315–2.994 g/mL), compressional time (DTc) (44.43–186.9 μs/ft), and shear time (DTs) (72.9–341.2 μs/ft). The GRU model was evaluated using different approaches, including statistical error analyses. The GRU model showed the proper trends, and the model data ranges were wider than previous ones. The GRU model has the largest correlation coefficient (<em>R</em>) of 0.967 and the lowest AAPRE, average percent relative error (APRE), root mean square error (RMSE), and standard deviation (SD) of 3.228%, −1.054%, 4.389, and 0.013, respectively, compared to other models. The GRU model has a high accuracy for the different datasets: training, validation, testing, and the whole datasets with <em>R</em> and AAPRE values were 0.981 and 2.601%, 0.966 and 3.274%, 0.967 and 3.228%, and 0.977 and 2.861%, respectively. The group error analyses of all inputs show that the GRU model has less than 5% AAPRE for all input ranges, which is superior to other models that have different AAPRE values of more than 10% at various ranges of inputs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 123-135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775523001555/pdfft?md5=ad9af7666bac5037c232b01b3220ac4a&pid=1-s2.0-S1674775523001555-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775523001555\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775523001555","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

静态泊松比(νs)对于确定石油应用(即采砂)中的地质力学特性至关重要。一些模型已被用于预测 νs;然而,已公布的模型仅限于特定的数据范围,平均绝对百分比相对误差 (AAPRE) 超过 10%。已发表的门控循环单元(GRU)模型并未考虑通过趋势分析来显示物理行为。在本研究中,我们的目标是利用趋势分析和三种输入建立一个 GRU 模型,以便根据广泛的数据预测 νs (值为 0.1627-0.4492)、地层体积密度 (RHOB) (0.315-2.994 g/mL)、压缩时间 (DTc) (44.43-186.9 μs/ft) 和剪切时间 (DTs) (72.9-341.2 μs/ft) 。采用不同的方法对 GRU 模型进行了评估,包括统计误差分析。GRU 模型显示了正确的趋势,模型数据范围比以前的模型更宽。与其他模型相比,GRU 模型的相关系数(R)最大,为 0.967,平均相对误差(AAPRE)、平均相对误差百分比(APRE)、均方根误差(RMSE)和标准偏差(SD)最小,分别为 3.228%、-1.054%、4.389 和 0.013。GRU 模型对不同数据集(训练集、验证集、测试集和整个数据集)的准确度较高,R 值和 AAPRE 值分别为 0.981 和 2.601%、0.966 和 3.274%、0.967 和 3.228%、0.977 和 2.861%。对所有输入值的分组误差分析表明,GRU 模型在所有输入值范围内的 AAPRE 均小于 5%,优于其他在不同输入值范围内 AAPRE 值相差超过 10%的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A gated recurrent unit model to predict Poisson's ratio using deep learning

Static Poisson's ratio (νs) is crucial for determining geomechanical properties in petroleum applications, namely sand production. Some models have been used to predict νs; however, the published models were limited to specific data ranges with an average absolute percentage relative error (AAPRE) of more than 10%. The published gated recurrent unit (GRU) models do not consider trend analysis to show physical behaviors. In this study, we aim to develop a GRU model using trend analysis and three inputs for predicting νs based on a broad range of data, νs (value of 0.1627–0.4492), bulk formation density (RHOB) (0.315–2.994 g/mL), compressional time (DTc) (44.43–186.9 μs/ft), and shear time (DTs) (72.9–341.2 μs/ft). The GRU model was evaluated using different approaches, including statistical error analyses. The GRU model showed the proper trends, and the model data ranges were wider than previous ones. The GRU model has the largest correlation coefficient (R) of 0.967 and the lowest AAPRE, average percent relative error (APRE), root mean square error (RMSE), and standard deviation (SD) of 3.228%, −1.054%, 4.389, and 0.013, respectively, compared to other models. The GRU model has a high accuracy for the different datasets: training, validation, testing, and the whole datasets with R and AAPRE values were 0.981 and 2.601%, 0.966 and 3.274%, 0.967 and 3.228%, and 0.977 and 2.861%, respectively. The group error analyses of all inputs show that the GRU model has less than 5% AAPRE for all input ranges, which is superior to other models that have different AAPRE values of more than 10% at various ranges of inputs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
227
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (JRMGE), overseen by the Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, is dedicated to the latest advancements in rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering. It serves as a platform for global scholars to stay updated on developments in various related fields including soil mechanics, foundation engineering, civil engineering, mining engineering, hydraulic engineering, petroleum engineering, and engineering geology. With a focus on fostering international academic exchange, JRMGE acts as a conduit between theoretical advancements and practical applications. Topics covered include new theories, technologies, methods, experiences, in-situ and laboratory tests, developments, case studies, and timely reviews within the realm of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信