听觉脑干反应的双耳交互成分与空间听力问卷波斯语版总分的相关性

IF 0.4 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Seyede Mohadeseh Hazavei, N. Rouhbakhsh, A. Heidari, S. Jalaie
{"title":"听觉脑干反应的双耳交互成分与空间听力问卷波斯语版总分的相关性","authors":"Seyede Mohadeseh Hazavei, N. Rouhbakhsh, A. Heidari, S. Jalaie","doi":"10.18502/avr.v32i2.12169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: People with spatial hearing impairment have difficulty perception   of speech in the presence of noise, sound localization, and estimating the distance from the sound source. In this study, the comparison between amplitude and latency of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR-BIC) with the total score of the Persian version of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (SHQ) in adults with normal hearing and moderate sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) was evaluated. \nMethods: In this cross-sectional comparative study 55, 18–45-year-old individuals including 35 of normal hearing and 20 moderate SNHL participated. All participants underwent the assessments of medical history, otoscopy, conventional audiometry, tympanometry, SHQ questionnaire, and auditory brainstem response (ABR). \nResults: There was no significant correlation between the amplitude and latency of the ABR- BIC and the Persian version of the SHQ in normal groups (r=–0.085, r=0.116) and in moderate SNHL groups (r=0.030, r=0.119). The mean value of ABR-BIC range of people with normal hearing and SNHL is statistically significant (p=0.001). \nConclusion: The results showed that the amplitude and latency of ABR-BIC were not correlated with the Persian version of the SHQ in people with normal hearing and with moderate SNHL but statistically significant between the mean amplitude and latency of ABR- BIC in people with normal hearing and people with hearing loss. \nKeywords: Auditory brainstem response; spatial hearing questionnaire; binaural interaction component; spatial hearing; spatial hearing disorder","PeriodicalId":34089,"journal":{"name":"Auditory and Vestibular Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Correlation between Binaural Interaction Component of the Auditory Brainstem Response and Total Score of the Persian Version of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire\",\"authors\":\"Seyede Mohadeseh Hazavei, N. Rouhbakhsh, A. Heidari, S. Jalaie\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/avr.v32i2.12169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Aim: People with spatial hearing impairment have difficulty perception   of speech in the presence of noise, sound localization, and estimating the distance from the sound source. In this study, the comparison between amplitude and latency of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR-BIC) with the total score of the Persian version of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (SHQ) in adults with normal hearing and moderate sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) was evaluated. \\nMethods: In this cross-sectional comparative study 55, 18–45-year-old individuals including 35 of normal hearing and 20 moderate SNHL participated. All participants underwent the assessments of medical history, otoscopy, conventional audiometry, tympanometry, SHQ questionnaire, and auditory brainstem response (ABR). \\nResults: There was no significant correlation between the amplitude and latency of the ABR- BIC and the Persian version of the SHQ in normal groups (r=–0.085, r=0.116) and in moderate SNHL groups (r=0.030, r=0.119). The mean value of ABR-BIC range of people with normal hearing and SNHL is statistically significant (p=0.001). \\nConclusion: The results showed that the amplitude and latency of ABR-BIC were not correlated with the Persian version of the SHQ in people with normal hearing and with moderate SNHL but statistically significant between the mean amplitude and latency of ABR- BIC in people with normal hearing and people with hearing loss. \\nKeywords: Auditory brainstem response; spatial hearing questionnaire; binaural interaction component; spatial hearing; spatial hearing disorder\",\"PeriodicalId\":34089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Auditory and Vestibular Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Auditory and Vestibular Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/avr.v32i2.12169\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auditory and Vestibular Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/avr.v32i2.12169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:空间性听力障碍患者在噪声存在的情况下难以感知语音,难以定位声音,难以估计与声源的距离。在本研究中,评估了听力正常和中度感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)成年人的听脑干反应(ABR-BIC)双耳交互成分的振幅和潜伏期与空间听力问卷(SHQ)波斯版总分之间的比较。方法:在这项横断面比较研究中,55名18-45岁的个体参与了研究,其中35名听力正常,20名中度SNHL。所有参与者都接受了病史评估、耳镜检查、常规听力测量、鼓室测量、SHQ问卷和听性脑干反应(ABR)。结果:正常组(r=-0.085,r=0.116)和中度SNHL组(r=0.030,r=0.119)ABR-BIC波幅和潜伏期与波斯版SHQ无显著相关性在听力正常和中度SNHL的人中,ABR-BIC与波斯版SHQ无关,但在听力正常的人和听力损失的人中ABR-BIC的平均振幅和潜伏期之间具有统计学意义。关键词:听性脑干反应;空间听觉问卷;双耳交互成分;空间听觉;空间性听力障碍
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Correlation between Binaural Interaction Component of the Auditory Brainstem Response and Total Score of the Persian Version of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire
Background and Aim: People with spatial hearing impairment have difficulty perception   of speech in the presence of noise, sound localization, and estimating the distance from the sound source. In this study, the comparison between amplitude and latency of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR-BIC) with the total score of the Persian version of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (SHQ) in adults with normal hearing and moderate sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) was evaluated. Methods: In this cross-sectional comparative study 55, 18–45-year-old individuals including 35 of normal hearing and 20 moderate SNHL participated. All participants underwent the assessments of medical history, otoscopy, conventional audiometry, tympanometry, SHQ questionnaire, and auditory brainstem response (ABR). Results: There was no significant correlation between the amplitude and latency of the ABR- BIC and the Persian version of the SHQ in normal groups (r=–0.085, r=0.116) and in moderate SNHL groups (r=0.030, r=0.119). The mean value of ABR-BIC range of people with normal hearing and SNHL is statistically significant (p=0.001). Conclusion: The results showed that the amplitude and latency of ABR-BIC were not correlated with the Persian version of the SHQ in people with normal hearing and with moderate SNHL but statistically significant between the mean amplitude and latency of ABR- BIC in people with normal hearing and people with hearing loss. Keywords: Auditory brainstem response; spatial hearing questionnaire; binaural interaction component; spatial hearing; spatial hearing disorder
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Auditory and Vestibular Research
Auditory and Vestibular Research Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信