{"title":"莫里斯-加纳诉“一步”案后的违约赔偿谈判","authors":"Yevhenii Shevchuk","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2019.1678105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Recent developments in the law of contract have led to a renewed interest in the concept of negotiating damages. The Supreme Court in Morris-Garner v One Step held that such damages may be awarded for breach of contract where the loss can be assessed appropriately by reference to the economic value of the right infringed. Such a right is considered a valuable asset of which the claimant is deprived by reason of the defendant’s breach. This paper examines negotiating damages in light of the recent decision in Morris-Garner v One Step.","PeriodicalId":35148,"journal":{"name":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"284 - 297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14729342.2019.1678105","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Negotiating damages for breach of contract after Morris-Garner v One Step\",\"authors\":\"Yevhenii Shevchuk\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14729342.2019.1678105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Recent developments in the law of contract have led to a renewed interest in the concept of negotiating damages. The Supreme Court in Morris-Garner v One Step held that such damages may be awarded for breach of contract where the loss can be assessed appropriately by reference to the economic value of the right infringed. Such a right is considered a valuable asset of which the claimant is deprived by reason of the defendant’s breach. This paper examines negotiating damages in light of the recent decision in Morris-Garner v One Step.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"284 - 297\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14729342.2019.1678105\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14729342.2019.1678105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14729342.2019.1678105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
最近合同法的发展重新引起了人们对协商损害赔偿概念的兴趣。最高法院在Morris-Garner v One Step一案中认为，如果损失可以参照被侵犯权利的经济价值进行适当评估，则可以判定此类损害赔偿为违约。这种权利被认为是一种宝贵的资产，由于被告的违约，索赔人被剥夺了这种资产。本文根据最近的莫里斯-加纳诉“一步”案的判决来考察谈判损害赔偿。
Negotiating damages for breach of contract after Morris-Garner v One Step
ABSTRACT Recent developments in the law of contract have led to a renewed interest in the concept of negotiating damages. The Supreme Court in Morris-Garner v One Step held that such damages may be awarded for breach of contract where the loss can be assessed appropriately by reference to the economic value of the right infringed. Such a right is considered a valuable asset of which the claimant is deprived by reason of the defendant’s breach. This paper examines negotiating damages in light of the recent decision in Morris-Garner v One Step.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
