欧文·巴菲尔德的《这一对永远不同的情侣》为柯勒律治式的想象辩护

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Jake Grefenstette
{"title":"欧文·巴菲尔德的《这一对永远不同的情侣》为柯勒律治式的想象辩护","authors":"Jake Grefenstette","doi":"10.3366/ink.2022.0135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Owen Barfield's This Ever Diverse Pair (1950) is a short novel about a poet-solicitor who has torn his consciousness in two. Burden, the practical half, begrudgingly attends to paperwork; Burgeon, the creative half, hides away and writes poetry. From Walter de la Mare to the present, readers of the text have tended to identify Barfield exclusively with Burgeon. And yet if we interrogate Burgeon's digressions on the nature of art, we find that this allegedly Barfieldian half is more often used as a mouthpiece for theories manifestly antithetical to Barfield's own. This article explores an alternative reading in which Burgeon and Burden are the respective embodiments of Coleridge's faculties of imagination and fancy. Barfield's aim in writing the book is, accordingly, not to purge the Burden in us; rather, it is to offer a narrative apology for Coleridge's model, to demonstrate the ‘polar’ relationship which underlies all acts of the imagination.","PeriodicalId":37069,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Inklings Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Owen Barfield's This Ever Diverse Pair as an Apology for the Coleridgean Imagination\",\"authors\":\"Jake Grefenstette\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/ink.2022.0135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Owen Barfield's This Ever Diverse Pair (1950) is a short novel about a poet-solicitor who has torn his consciousness in two. Burden, the practical half, begrudgingly attends to paperwork; Burgeon, the creative half, hides away and writes poetry. From Walter de la Mare to the present, readers of the text have tended to identify Barfield exclusively with Burgeon. And yet if we interrogate Burgeon's digressions on the nature of art, we find that this allegedly Barfieldian half is more often used as a mouthpiece for theories manifestly antithetical to Barfield's own. This article explores an alternative reading in which Burgeon and Burden are the respective embodiments of Coleridge's faculties of imagination and fancy. Barfield's aim in writing the book is, accordingly, not to purge the Burden in us; rather, it is to offer a narrative apology for Coleridge's model, to demonstrate the ‘polar’ relationship which underlies all acts of the imagination.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Inklings Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Inklings Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/ink.2022.0135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Inklings Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/ink.2022.0135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧文·巴菲尔德(Owen Barfield)的《永远不同的一对》(1950)是一部短篇小说,讲述了一个诗人兼律师将自己的意识一分为二的故事。伯顿是务实的那一半,不情愿地处理文书工作;布尔金是富有创造力的那一半,他躲起来写诗。从Walter de la Mare到现在,文本的读者倾向于将Barfield与Burgeon单独识别。然而,如果我们质问伯金关于艺术本质的离题,我们会发现,这所谓的巴菲尔德式的一半更经常被用作与巴菲尔德自己的理论明显相反的理论的喉舌。这篇文章探讨了另一种解读,在这种解读中,伯格恩和伯顿分别是柯勒律治想象力和想象力的体现。因此,巴菲尔德写这本书的目的并不是为了清除我们内心的负担;相反,它是为柯勒律治的模式提供一种叙事上的道歉,以展示所有想象行为背后的“两极”关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Owen Barfield's This Ever Diverse Pair as an Apology for the Coleridgean Imagination
Owen Barfield's This Ever Diverse Pair (1950) is a short novel about a poet-solicitor who has torn his consciousness in two. Burden, the practical half, begrudgingly attends to paperwork; Burgeon, the creative half, hides away and writes poetry. From Walter de la Mare to the present, readers of the text have tended to identify Barfield exclusively with Burgeon. And yet if we interrogate Burgeon's digressions on the nature of art, we find that this allegedly Barfieldian half is more often used as a mouthpiece for theories manifestly antithetical to Barfield's own. This article explores an alternative reading in which Burgeon and Burden are the respective embodiments of Coleridge's faculties of imagination and fancy. Barfield's aim in writing the book is, accordingly, not to purge the Burden in us; rather, it is to offer a narrative apology for Coleridge's model, to demonstrate the ‘polar’ relationship which underlies all acts of the imagination.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Inklings Studies
Journal of Inklings Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信