3D打印植入式装置灭菌技术的评估

Sarah A. Stewart, Juan Domínguez-Robles, R. Donnelly, E. Larrañeta
{"title":"3D打印植入式装置灭菌技术的评估","authors":"Sarah A. Stewart, Juan Domínguez-Robles, R. Donnelly, E. Larrañeta","doi":"10.1093/rpsppr/rqad003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n This article investigates the potential use of microwave (MW) radiation, UV-light and gamma radiation for the sterilisation of 3D-printed implantable devices prepared using poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA).\n \n \n \n Samples were sterilised using MW, UV and gamma radiation. Subsequently, the sterility of these samples was tested following the British Pharmacopeia test for sterility and controlled contamination test. Finally, sterilised samples were characterised (DSC, FTIR and drug release studies) to evaluate potential changes in their physicochemical properties during sterilisation.\n \n \n \n MW-radiation failed the British Pharmacopeia test for sterility. UV-light did not pass the British Pharmacopoeia test for sterility, but it showed promising results for the controlled contamination test (bacterial-contamination reduction >99.9%). These techniques did not modify the physicochemical properties of PLA. On the other hand, samples treated with gamma radiation passed the British Pharmacopeia sterility tests. However, the Tg and mechanical properties of the resulting samples were affected by gamma radiation. It is important to note that none of the sterilisation methods investigated in this article resulted in any change in the in vitro release results.\n \n \n \n Only gamma radiation passed the British Pharmacopeia test for sterility. However, UV method showed potential and should be further investigated.\n","PeriodicalId":74744,"journal":{"name":"RPS pharmacy and pharmacology reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of sterilisation techniques for 3D-printed implantable devices\",\"authors\":\"Sarah A. Stewart, Juan Domínguez-Robles, R. Donnelly, E. Larrañeta\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/rpsppr/rqad003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n This article investigates the potential use of microwave (MW) radiation, UV-light and gamma radiation for the sterilisation of 3D-printed implantable devices prepared using poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA).\\n \\n \\n \\n Samples were sterilised using MW, UV and gamma radiation. Subsequently, the sterility of these samples was tested following the British Pharmacopeia test for sterility and controlled contamination test. Finally, sterilised samples were characterised (DSC, FTIR and drug release studies) to evaluate potential changes in their physicochemical properties during sterilisation.\\n \\n \\n \\n MW-radiation failed the British Pharmacopeia test for sterility. UV-light did not pass the British Pharmacopoeia test for sterility, but it showed promising results for the controlled contamination test (bacterial-contamination reduction >99.9%). These techniques did not modify the physicochemical properties of PLA. On the other hand, samples treated with gamma radiation passed the British Pharmacopeia sterility tests. However, the Tg and mechanical properties of the resulting samples were affected by gamma radiation. It is important to note that none of the sterilisation methods investigated in this article resulted in any change in the in vitro release results.\\n \\n \\n \\n Only gamma radiation passed the British Pharmacopeia test for sterility. However, UV method showed potential and should be further investigated.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":74744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RPS pharmacy and pharmacology reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RPS pharmacy and pharmacology reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpsppr/rqad003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RPS pharmacy and pharmacology reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpsppr/rqad003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文研究了微波(MW)辐射、紫外线和伽马辐射在使用聚乳酸(PLA)和聚乙烯醇(PVA)制备的3D打印植入式装置灭菌中的潜在用途。使用微波、紫外线和伽马辐射对样品进行消毒。随后,按照英国药典无菌性试验和控制污染试验对这些样品进行无菌性试验。最后,对灭菌样品进行了表征(DSC、FTIR和药物释放研究),以评估灭菌过程中其物理化学性质的潜在变化。MW辐射未通过英国药典无菌试验。紫外线没有通过英国药典的无菌测试,但在控制污染测试中显示出有希望的结果(细菌污染减少>99.9%)。这些技术没有改变PLA的物理化学性质。另一方面,用伽马射线处理的样本通过了英国药典无菌测试。然而,所得样品的Tg和机械性能受到伽马辐射的影响。值得注意的是,本文研究的灭菌方法均未导致体外释放结果发生任何变化。只有伽马射线通过了英国药典的无菌检查。然而,紫外线法显示出潜力,还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of sterilisation techniques for 3D-printed implantable devices
This article investigates the potential use of microwave (MW) radiation, UV-light and gamma radiation for the sterilisation of 3D-printed implantable devices prepared using poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA). Samples were sterilised using MW, UV and gamma radiation. Subsequently, the sterility of these samples was tested following the British Pharmacopeia test for sterility and controlled contamination test. Finally, sterilised samples were characterised (DSC, FTIR and drug release studies) to evaluate potential changes in their physicochemical properties during sterilisation. MW-radiation failed the British Pharmacopeia test for sterility. UV-light did not pass the British Pharmacopoeia test for sterility, but it showed promising results for the controlled contamination test (bacterial-contamination reduction >99.9%). These techniques did not modify the physicochemical properties of PLA. On the other hand, samples treated with gamma radiation passed the British Pharmacopeia sterility tests. However, the Tg and mechanical properties of the resulting samples were affected by gamma radiation. It is important to note that none of the sterilisation methods investigated in this article resulted in any change in the in vitro release results. Only gamma radiation passed the British Pharmacopeia test for sterility. However, UV method showed potential and should be further investigated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信