美学冷战:非殖民化与全球文学

IF 0.5 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE
Marius Hentea
{"title":"美学冷战:非殖民化与全球文学","authors":"Marius Hentea","doi":"10.1353/sdn.2023.a899465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"lesbian Western’s gender play inevitably crashes into the history of white supremacy. Even at best, the well-intentioned white character still benefits from colonialist racism and genocide” (77). Indeed, in Chapter Four, “Tomboys and Indians,” Garber spends a lot of time on the problematic history of Westerns writ large, and lesbian historical fiction specifically, begging the question of the utility of the genre itself if it cannot succeed without replicating the racism, sexism, and colonialism of heterosexual writers. Nonetheless, Garber does an excellent job of revealing the ways in which this sub-genre vilifies and, at the same time, appropriates Native American culture, enacting a form of literary criticism that is necessarily critical of the genre as it yet extols its efforts. One of the book’s more significant weaknesses is noted by the author: the near non-existence of lesbian historical fiction written by Black, Indigenous, and other lesbians of color. Related to that is the inclusion of one film that examines Black lesbian historical fiction, which seems out of place in a text focused on genre novels. Chapter Two, “Haunting the Archives,” focuses primarily on the ways in which writers utilize the archive to inspire and support their work, as well as how they fashion narratives based on what is absent from the historical record. Garber briefly mentions Jewelle Gomez’s The Gilda Stories (1991), an historical rendering of a Black lesbian born during the Civil War era, but spends considerably more time on The Watermelon Woman (1996), a film by Cheryl Dunye focused on recovering a usable Black lesbian filmic past. Thematically, inclusion of Dunye’s film works here because it is doing the work lesbian historical fiction is tasked with doing: situating lesbians in a specific historical period (in this case, the era of early cinema) in order to create a usable past in which present-day lesbians can imagine themselves. However, the mockumentary seems out of place, as every other text mentioned in Garber’s study is a novel. To be sure, this is a reminder of the paucity of Black lesbian historical fiction and shines a glaring light on the overwhelming whiteness of lesbian literature and literary culture. Overall, Novel Approaches to Lesbian History does what it sets out to do: remind readers that, regardless of the limits of positivist historiography and irrevocable gaps in the archive, lesbians have always been with us. Lesbian writers are committed to recovering their own histories, even if that means creating them. Scholars and students of lesbian and queer literatures will find a plethora of material to work with, as Garber also includes a bibliography of lesbian historical fiction to encourage further research.","PeriodicalId":54138,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Aesthetic Cold War: Decolonization and Global Literature by Peter Kalliney (review)\",\"authors\":\"Marius Hentea\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/sdn.2023.a899465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"lesbian Western’s gender play inevitably crashes into the history of white supremacy. Even at best, the well-intentioned white character still benefits from colonialist racism and genocide” (77). Indeed, in Chapter Four, “Tomboys and Indians,” Garber spends a lot of time on the problematic history of Westerns writ large, and lesbian historical fiction specifically, begging the question of the utility of the genre itself if it cannot succeed without replicating the racism, sexism, and colonialism of heterosexual writers. Nonetheless, Garber does an excellent job of revealing the ways in which this sub-genre vilifies and, at the same time, appropriates Native American culture, enacting a form of literary criticism that is necessarily critical of the genre as it yet extols its efforts. One of the book’s more significant weaknesses is noted by the author: the near non-existence of lesbian historical fiction written by Black, Indigenous, and other lesbians of color. Related to that is the inclusion of one film that examines Black lesbian historical fiction, which seems out of place in a text focused on genre novels. Chapter Two, “Haunting the Archives,” focuses primarily on the ways in which writers utilize the archive to inspire and support their work, as well as how they fashion narratives based on what is absent from the historical record. Garber briefly mentions Jewelle Gomez’s The Gilda Stories (1991), an historical rendering of a Black lesbian born during the Civil War era, but spends considerably more time on The Watermelon Woman (1996), a film by Cheryl Dunye focused on recovering a usable Black lesbian filmic past. Thematically, inclusion of Dunye’s film works here because it is doing the work lesbian historical fiction is tasked with doing: situating lesbians in a specific historical period (in this case, the era of early cinema) in order to create a usable past in which present-day lesbians can imagine themselves. However, the mockumentary seems out of place, as every other text mentioned in Garber’s study is a novel. To be sure, this is a reminder of the paucity of Black lesbian historical fiction and shines a glaring light on the overwhelming whiteness of lesbian literature and literary culture. Overall, Novel Approaches to Lesbian History does what it sets out to do: remind readers that, regardless of the limits of positivist historiography and irrevocable gaps in the archive, lesbians have always been with us. Lesbian writers are committed to recovering their own histories, even if that means creating them. Scholars and students of lesbian and queer literatures will find a plethora of material to work with, as Garber also includes a bibliography of lesbian historical fiction to encourage further research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2023.a899465\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2023.a899465","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

女同性恋西部片的性别游戏不可避免地撞上了白人至上主义的历史。即使在最好的情况下,善意的白人角色仍然受益于殖民主义种族主义和种族灭绝”(77)。事实上,在第四章“假男和印第安人”中,加伯花了很多时间来研究西部片的历史问题,尤其是女同性恋历史小说,并提出了一个问题:如果不复制异性恋作家的种族主义、性别歧视和殖民主义,这类小说就无法成功,那么它本身的作用是什么?尽管如此,加伯还是出色地揭示了这一子类型对美国本土文化的诋毁,同时又挪用的方式,制定了一种文学批评的形式,这种批评必然是对这一类型的批评,同时又赞扬了它的努力。作者指出了这本书的一个更重要的弱点:黑人、土著和其他有色人种的女同性恋几乎不存在女同性恋历史小说。与此相关的是,有一部电影考察了黑人女同性恋历史小说,这在一个以类型小说为重点的文本中似乎不太合适。第二章,“萦绕在档案中”,主要关注作家如何利用档案来启发和支持他们的作品,以及他们如何根据历史记录中缺失的东西来塑造叙事。加伯简要地提到了朱勒·戈麦斯的《吉尔达故事》(1991),这是一部对内战时期出生的黑人女同性恋的历史渲染,但在谢丽尔·邓耶的《西瓜女》(1996)上花了相当多的时间,这部电影专注于恢复黑人女同性恋电影的历史。从主题上讲,这里包括邓耶的电影作品,因为它正在做女同性恋历史小说的任务:把女同性恋置于一个特定的历史时期(在这种情况下,早期电影时代),以便创造一个可用的过去,让当今的女同性恋可以想象自己。然而,这部伪纪录片似乎不合时宜,因为加伯的研究中提到的其他文本都是小说。可以肯定的是,这提醒了我们黑人女同性恋历史小说的匮乏,也让我们看到了白人女同性恋文学和文学文化的压倒性优势。总的来说,《女同性恋历史的新途径》做到了它所要做的:提醒读者,不管实证主义史学的局限性和档案中不可弥补的空白,女同性恋一直与我们同在。女同性恋作家致力于恢复她们自己的历史,即使这意味着创造历史。研究女同性恋和酷儿文学的学者和学生会发现大量的材料可供研究,因为加伯还包括了女同性恋历史小说的参考书目,以鼓励进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Aesthetic Cold War: Decolonization and Global Literature by Peter Kalliney (review)
lesbian Western’s gender play inevitably crashes into the history of white supremacy. Even at best, the well-intentioned white character still benefits from colonialist racism and genocide” (77). Indeed, in Chapter Four, “Tomboys and Indians,” Garber spends a lot of time on the problematic history of Westerns writ large, and lesbian historical fiction specifically, begging the question of the utility of the genre itself if it cannot succeed without replicating the racism, sexism, and colonialism of heterosexual writers. Nonetheless, Garber does an excellent job of revealing the ways in which this sub-genre vilifies and, at the same time, appropriates Native American culture, enacting a form of literary criticism that is necessarily critical of the genre as it yet extols its efforts. One of the book’s more significant weaknesses is noted by the author: the near non-existence of lesbian historical fiction written by Black, Indigenous, and other lesbians of color. Related to that is the inclusion of one film that examines Black lesbian historical fiction, which seems out of place in a text focused on genre novels. Chapter Two, “Haunting the Archives,” focuses primarily on the ways in which writers utilize the archive to inspire and support their work, as well as how they fashion narratives based on what is absent from the historical record. Garber briefly mentions Jewelle Gomez’s The Gilda Stories (1991), an historical rendering of a Black lesbian born during the Civil War era, but spends considerably more time on The Watermelon Woman (1996), a film by Cheryl Dunye focused on recovering a usable Black lesbian filmic past. Thematically, inclusion of Dunye’s film works here because it is doing the work lesbian historical fiction is tasked with doing: situating lesbians in a specific historical period (in this case, the era of early cinema) in order to create a usable past in which present-day lesbians can imagine themselves. However, the mockumentary seems out of place, as every other text mentioned in Garber’s study is a novel. To be sure, this is a reminder of the paucity of Black lesbian historical fiction and shines a glaring light on the overwhelming whiteness of lesbian literature and literary culture. Overall, Novel Approaches to Lesbian History does what it sets out to do: remind readers that, regardless of the limits of positivist historiography and irrevocable gaps in the archive, lesbians have always been with us. Lesbian writers are committed to recovering their own histories, even if that means creating them. Scholars and students of lesbian and queer literatures will find a plethora of material to work with, as Garber also includes a bibliography of lesbian historical fiction to encourage further research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
STUDIES IN THE NOVEL
STUDIES IN THE NOVEL LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: From its inception, Studies in the Novel has been dedicated to building a scholarly community around the world-making potentialities of the novel. Studies in the Novel started as an idea among several members of the English Department of the University of North Texas during the summer of 1965. They determined that there was a need for a journal “devoted to publishing critical and scholarly articles on the novel with no restrictions on either chronology or nationality of the novelists studied.” The founding editor, University of North Texas professor of contemporary literature James W. Lee, envisioned a journal of international scope and influence. Since then, Studies in the Novel has staked its reputation upon publishing incisive scholarship on the canon-forming and cutting-edge novelists that have shaped the genre’s rich history. The journal continues to break new ground by promoting new theoretical approaches, a broader international scope, and an engagement with the contemporary novel as a form of social critique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信