面对大流行病,通往更可持续的企业之路:需要改变雇佣关系

IF 3.8 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Álvaro López-Cabrales, A. Denisi
{"title":"面对大流行病,通往更可持续的企业之路:需要改变雇佣关系","authors":"Álvaro López-Cabrales, A. Denisi","doi":"10.1177/23409444211017913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the way we operate at work. Dealing with these changes may require new ways of thinking about our models of employment relationships, to create more sustainable organizations during troubled times. Sustainability can be understood as an attempt to strike a balance between the economic, social and environmental goals of companies—a balance that could drive a global recovery from the pandemic crisis. This essay focuses on the employer’s perspective and considers how firms can use different employment models to improve sustainability during the crisis. We propose two alternative employment models which we label “Oversustainability” and “Mutual Sustainability” that depend on the choice of the firm’s competitive strategy (proactive/innovative vs analyzer/following). We considered the contributions expected from employees and the inducements they were offered under each model. We believe these employment models can be advantageous for companies seeking to adopt proactive and analyzer-type sustainability strategies. JEL CLASSIFICATION M1","PeriodicalId":46891,"journal":{"name":"Brq-Business Research Quarterly","volume":"24 1","pages":"241 - 248"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/23409444211017913","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The road to more sustainable firms in the face of a pandemic: Changes needed in employment relationships\",\"authors\":\"Álvaro López-Cabrales, A. Denisi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23409444211017913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the way we operate at work. Dealing with these changes may require new ways of thinking about our models of employment relationships, to create more sustainable organizations during troubled times. Sustainability can be understood as an attempt to strike a balance between the economic, social and environmental goals of companies—a balance that could drive a global recovery from the pandemic crisis. This essay focuses on the employer’s perspective and considers how firms can use different employment models to improve sustainability during the crisis. We propose two alternative employment models which we label “Oversustainability” and “Mutual Sustainability” that depend on the choice of the firm’s competitive strategy (proactive/innovative vs analyzer/following). We considered the contributions expected from employees and the inducements they were offered under each model. We believe these employment models can be advantageous for companies seeking to adopt proactive and analyzer-type sustainability strategies. JEL CLASSIFICATION M1\",\"PeriodicalId\":46891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brq-Business Research Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"241 - 248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/23409444211017913\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brq-Business Research Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444211017913\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brq-Business Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444211017913","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

2019冠状病毒病大流行改变了我们的工作方式。应对这些变化可能需要以新的方式思考我们的雇佣关系模式,以便在困难时期创建更可持续的组织。可持续性可以理解为在企业的经济、社会和环境目标之间取得平衡的一种尝试,这种平衡可以推动全球从疫情危机中复苏。本文侧重于雇主的观点,并考虑公司如何使用不同的就业模式来提高危机期间的可持续性。我们提出了两种可供选择的就业模式,我们将其标记为“过度可持续发展”和“相互可持续发展”,这取决于公司竞争战略的选择(主动/创新vs分析/跟随)。我们考虑了每个模式下期望员工做出的贡献和提供给他们的激励。我们相信,这些雇佣模式对于寻求采用前瞻性和分析型可持续发展战略的公司是有利的。凝胶分类m1
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The road to more sustainable firms in the face of a pandemic: Changes needed in employment relationships
The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the way we operate at work. Dealing with these changes may require new ways of thinking about our models of employment relationships, to create more sustainable organizations during troubled times. Sustainability can be understood as an attempt to strike a balance between the economic, social and environmental goals of companies—a balance that could drive a global recovery from the pandemic crisis. This essay focuses on the employer’s perspective and considers how firms can use different employment models to improve sustainability during the crisis. We propose two alternative employment models which we label “Oversustainability” and “Mutual Sustainability” that depend on the choice of the firm’s competitive strategy (proactive/innovative vs analyzer/following). We considered the contributions expected from employees and the inducements they were offered under each model. We believe these employment models can be advantageous for companies seeking to adopt proactive and analyzer-type sustainability strategies. JEL CLASSIFICATION M1
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.90%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信