广告技术中的反垄断问题:将多种行为和行为的综合效应正规化

Q2 Social Sciences
Oliver Latham, Mikaël Hervé, Romain Bizet
{"title":"广告技术中的反垄断问题:将多种行为和行为的综合效应正规化","authors":"Oliver Latham, Mikaël Hervé, Romain Bizet","doi":"10.1080/17441056.2021.1893960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We present an economic model of competition in the ad tech “stack”. We use this model to understand how the complex web of conducts implemented by Google – and under scrutiny by both U.S. and European antitrust enforcers – can be rationalized as a profit-maximizing, exclusionary strategy. We show how vertical integration, linking of services across the stack and the use of complex auction models increases incentive and ability to foreclose rivals and why there might be incentives to limit data and ID sharing so as to undermine rival intermediaries. We show how these conducts can have negative effects on consumer welfare via an increase in the prices paid by online advertisers and a decline in incentives to invest in producing content. We discuss also the level of “take rate” charged by different intermediaries and explain how differences in the ability to price discriminate undermines the relevance of such comparisons.","PeriodicalId":52118,"journal":{"name":"European Competition Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17441056.2021.1893960","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antitrust concerns in Ad-Tech: formalizing the combined effect of multiple conducts and behaviours\",\"authors\":\"Oliver Latham, Mikaël Hervé, Romain Bizet\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17441056.2021.1893960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT We present an economic model of competition in the ad tech “stack”. We use this model to understand how the complex web of conducts implemented by Google – and under scrutiny by both U.S. and European antitrust enforcers – can be rationalized as a profit-maximizing, exclusionary strategy. We show how vertical integration, linking of services across the stack and the use of complex auction models increases incentive and ability to foreclose rivals and why there might be incentives to limit data and ID sharing so as to undermine rival intermediaries. We show how these conducts can have negative effects on consumer welfare via an increase in the prices paid by online advertisers and a decline in incentives to invest in producing content. We discuss also the level of “take rate” charged by different intermediaries and explain how differences in the ability to price discriminate undermines the relevance of such comparisons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Competition Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17441056.2021.1893960\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Competition Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2021.1893960\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Competition Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2021.1893960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们提出了一个广告技术“堆栈”竞争的经济模型。我们使用这个模型来理解bb0实施的复杂行为网络——并受到美国和欧洲反垄断执法机构的审查——如何被合理化为一种利润最大化的排他性策略。我们展示了垂直整合、跨堆栈的服务链接和复杂拍卖模型的使用如何增加了取消竞争对手抵押品赎回权的激励和能力,以及为什么可能会有限制数据和ID共享的激励,从而削弱竞争对手的中介机构。我们展示了这些行为如何通过增加在线广告商支付的价格和减少投资制作内容的动机来对消费者福利产生负面影响。我们还讨论了不同中介机构收取的“费率”水平,并解释了价格歧视能力的差异如何破坏了这种比较的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antitrust concerns in Ad-Tech: formalizing the combined effect of multiple conducts and behaviours
ABSTRACT We present an economic model of competition in the ad tech “stack”. We use this model to understand how the complex web of conducts implemented by Google – and under scrutiny by both U.S. and European antitrust enforcers – can be rationalized as a profit-maximizing, exclusionary strategy. We show how vertical integration, linking of services across the stack and the use of complex auction models increases incentive and ability to foreclose rivals and why there might be incentives to limit data and ID sharing so as to undermine rival intermediaries. We show how these conducts can have negative effects on consumer welfare via an increase in the prices paid by online advertisers and a decline in incentives to invest in producing content. We discuss also the level of “take rate” charged by different intermediaries and explain how differences in the ability to price discriminate undermines the relevance of such comparisons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Competition Journal
European Competition Journal Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The European Competition Journal publishes outstanding scholarly articles relating to European competition law and economics. Its mission is to help foster learning and debate about how European competition law and policy can continue to develop in an economically rational way. Articles published in the Journal are subject to rigorous peer review by leading experts from around Europe. Topics include: -Vertical and Conglomerate Mergers -Enlargement of the Union - the ramifications for Competition Policy -Unilateral and Coordinated Effects in Merger Control -Modernisation of European Competition law -Cartels and Leniency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信