对Sogeram语言进行分组

IF 0.5 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Journal of Historical Linguistics Pub Date : 2019-07-02 DOI:10.1075/JHL.17011.DAN

Don Daniels, Danielle Barth, Wolfgang Barth

{"title":"对Sogeram语言进行分组","authors":"Don Daniels, Danielle Barth, Wolfgang Barth","doi":"10.1075/JHL.17011.DAN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Historical Glottometry is a method, recently proposed by Kalyan and François (François 2014; Kalyan & François 2018), for analyzing and\n representing the relationships among sister languages in a language family. We present a glottometric analysis of the Sogeram\n language family of Papua New Guinea and, in the process, provide an evaluation of the method. We focus on three topics that we\n regard as problematic: how to handle the higher incidence of cross-cutting isoglosses in the Sogeram data; how best to handle\n lexical innovations; and what to do when the data do not allow the analyst to be sure whether a given language underwent a given\n innovation or not. For each topic we compare different ways of coding and calculating the data and suggest the best way forward.\n We conclude by proposing changes to the way glottometric data are coded and calculated and the way glottometric results are\n visualized. We also discuss how to incorporate Historical Glottometry into an effective historical-linguistic research\n workflow.","PeriodicalId":42165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subgrouping the Sogeram languages\",\"authors\":\"Don Daniels, Danielle Barth, Wolfgang Barth\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/JHL.17011.DAN\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Historical Glottometry is a method, recently proposed by Kalyan and François (François 2014; Kalyan & François 2018), for analyzing and\\n representing the relationships among sister languages in a language family. We present a glottometric analysis of the Sogeram\\n language family of Papua New Guinea and, in the process, provide an evaluation of the method. We focus on three topics that we\\n regard as problematic: how to handle the higher incidence of cross-cutting isoglosses in the Sogeram data; how best to handle\\n lexical innovations; and what to do when the data do not allow the analyst to be sure whether a given language underwent a given\\n innovation or not. For each topic we compare different ways of coding and calculating the data and suggest the best way forward.\\n We conclude by proposing changes to the way glottometric data are coded and calculated and the way glottometric results are\\n visualized. We also discuss how to incorporate Historical Glottometry into an effective historical-linguistic research\\n workflow.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Historical Linguistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Historical Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/JHL.17011.DAN\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/JHL.17011.DAN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

摘要

历史声门测量法是Kalyan和franois最近提出的一种方法(franois 2014;Kalyan & franois 2018)，用于分析和表示一个语系中姐妹语言之间的关系。我们提出了巴布亚新几内亚的Sogeram语族的声速分析，并在此过程中，提供了该方法的评估。我们关注三个我们认为有问题的主题:如何处理Sogeram数据中较高发生率的横切等值损失;如何最好地处理词汇创新;当数据不允许分析师确定给定的语言是否经历了给定的创新时，该怎么办?对于每个主题，我们比较了不同的编码和计算数据的方法，并提出了最好的方法。最后，我们建议改变声门测量数据的编码和计算方式，以及声门测量结果的可视化方式。我们还讨论了如何将历史语言测量法纳入有效的历史语言学研究工作流程。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Subgrouping the Sogeram languages

Historical Glottometry is a method, recently proposed by Kalyan and François (François 2014; Kalyan & François 2018), for analyzing and representing the relationships among sister languages in a language family. We present a glottometric analysis of the Sogeram language family of Papua New Guinea and, in the process, provide an evaluation of the method. We focus on three topics that we regard as problematic: how to handle the higher incidence of cross-cutting isoglosses in the Sogeram data; how best to handle lexical innovations; and what to do when the data do not allow the analyst to be sure whether a given language underwent a given innovation or not. For each topic we compare different ways of coding and calculating the data and suggest the best way forward. We conclude by proposing changes to the way glottometric data are coded and calculated and the way glottometric results are visualized. We also discuss how to incorporate Historical Glottometry into an effective historical-linguistic research workflow.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Historical Linguistics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Historical Linguistics aims to publish, after peer-review, papers that make a significant contribution to the theory and/or methodology of historical linguistics. Papers dealing with any language or language family are welcome. Papers should have a diachronic orientation and should offer new perspectives, refine existing methodologies, or challenge received wisdom, on the basis of careful analysis of extant historical data. We are especially keen to publish work which links historical linguistics to corpus-based research, linguistic typology, language variation, language contact, or the study of language and cognition, all of which constitute a major source of methodological renewal for the discipline and shed light on aspects of language change. Contributions in areas such as diachronic corpus linguistics or diachronic typology are therefore particularly welcome.