与联盟合作的能力:一个长期案例研究

Q2 Social Sciences
Gustavo Palmisano Avelar, Rosiléia Milagres
{"title":"与联盟合作的能力:一个长期案例研究","authors":"Gustavo Palmisano Avelar, Rosiléia Milagres","doi":"10.5752/P.1984-6606.2020V20N56P80-98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to identify advantages and disadvantages of implementing a framework dedicated to managing alliances and assessing the instruments created and their purpose. The results demonstrate that the advantages of the dedicated structure - mediation, organization and relationship centralization - outweigh the disadvantages - bureaucratization and slow decision making. The research contributed to the discussion about the office's role and the relationship between it and the mechanisms of alliance capacity building. It also contributed to reaffirm its importance, confirming the literature regarding the accumulation and exchange of knowledge and the identification of new opportunities. Another contribution is related to the longitudinal evaluation – little used method in the literature - of the office performance, showing its evolution and learning mechanisms. Regarding our contributions to managers, we also highlight the need for autonomy and organizational support to the office and the need for specific training in alliance portfolio management for those involved.","PeriodicalId":35551,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Government","volume":"20 1","pages":"80-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CAPACIDADES PARA TRABALHAR COM ALIANÇA: UM ESTUDO DE CASO LONGITUDINAL\",\"authors\":\"Gustavo Palmisano Avelar, Rosiléia Milagres\",\"doi\":\"10.5752/P.1984-6606.2020V20N56P80-98\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims to identify advantages and disadvantages of implementing a framework dedicated to managing alliances and assessing the instruments created and their purpose. The results demonstrate that the advantages of the dedicated structure - mediation, organization and relationship centralization - outweigh the disadvantages - bureaucratization and slow decision making. The research contributed to the discussion about the office's role and the relationship between it and the mechanisms of alliance capacity building. It also contributed to reaffirm its importance, confirming the literature regarding the accumulation and exchange of knowledge and the identification of new opportunities. Another contribution is related to the longitudinal evaluation – little used method in the literature - of the office performance, showing its evolution and learning mechanisms. Regarding our contributions to managers, we also highlight the need for autonomy and organizational support to the office and the need for specific training in alliance portfolio management for those involved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic Government\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"80-98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic Government\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5752/P.1984-6606.2020V20N56P80-98\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Government","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5752/P.1984-6606.2020V20N56P80-98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在确定实施一个专门用于管理联盟和评估所创建的工具及其目的的框架的优点和缺点。研究结果表明,专门化结构的优势(调解、组织和关系集中化)大于劣势(官僚化和决策缓慢)。本研究有助于探讨联盟能力建设机制与办公室角色的关系。它还有助于重申其重要性,证实了关于积累和交流知识以及确定新机会的文献。另一个贡献与纵向评价有关-在文献中很少使用的方法-办公室绩效,显示其演变和学习机制。关于我们对管理人员的贡献,我们还强调了对办公室的自治和组织支持的需要,以及对相关人员进行联盟投资组合管理方面的具体培训的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CAPACIDADES PARA TRABALHAR COM ALIANÇA: UM ESTUDO DE CASO LONGITUDINAL
This article aims to identify advantages and disadvantages of implementing a framework dedicated to managing alliances and assessing the instruments created and their purpose. The results demonstrate that the advantages of the dedicated structure - mediation, organization and relationship centralization - outweigh the disadvantages - bureaucratization and slow decision making. The research contributed to the discussion about the office's role and the relationship between it and the mechanisms of alliance capacity building. It also contributed to reaffirm its importance, confirming the literature regarding the accumulation and exchange of knowledge and the identification of new opportunities. Another contribution is related to the longitudinal evaluation – little used method in the literature - of the office performance, showing its evolution and learning mechanisms. Regarding our contributions to managers, we also highlight the need for autonomy and organizational support to the office and the need for specific training in alliance portfolio management for those involved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic Government
Electronic Government Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Electronic Government, a fully refereed journal, publishes articles that present current practice and research in the area of e-government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信