管理绩效及其对受益群体的影响分析

S. Kridasakti
{"title":"管理绩效及其对受益群体的影响分析","authors":"S. Kridasakti","doi":"10.7454/ajce.v2i1.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For most community engagement in universities, the beneficiary self-help impact as considered as CO-CD principle has been disregarded. The critical issues of this research were to respond whether the UT community-engagement management had been executed properly? and Whether UT community-engagement had been capable of giving positive impacts on the beneficiary communities? This research-design covered 2 clusters. The first was the managerial performance issues, and the second was the impact factors on the beneficiary communities. The method used was a Survey, and the data were collected using composite sampling between Purposive Judgment and ‘Census’. The data analysis was also a combination among The Performance Analysis, The Context-Input-Process-Product, and the CO-CD concept. The findings were: First, less-credible (64%) for quantitative achievement, and poor on the qualitative targeting. The “Gap” was due to the absennce of ‘CO-CD base’ on the UT community-engagement grand-policy; Second, good-mode on short term impacts. However, ‘Self-help’ creation in the beneficiary communities could not be achieved. From the findings, it can be concluded that there was no direct-correlation between the weakmanagerial-performance and the relatively good-impact on its beneficiary communities.","PeriodicalId":32959,"journal":{"name":"ASEAN Journal of Community Engagement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Management Performance And Its Impact Analysis On The Beneficiary Community”\",\"authors\":\"S. Kridasakti\",\"doi\":\"10.7454/ajce.v2i1.119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For most community engagement in universities, the beneficiary self-help impact as considered as CO-CD principle has been disregarded. The critical issues of this research were to respond whether the UT community-engagement management had been executed properly? and Whether UT community-engagement had been capable of giving positive impacts on the beneficiary communities? This research-design covered 2 clusters. The first was the managerial performance issues, and the second was the impact factors on the beneficiary communities. The method used was a Survey, and the data were collected using composite sampling between Purposive Judgment and ‘Census’. The data analysis was also a combination among The Performance Analysis, The Context-Input-Process-Product, and the CO-CD concept. The findings were: First, less-credible (64%) for quantitative achievement, and poor on the qualitative targeting. The “Gap” was due to the absennce of ‘CO-CD base’ on the UT community-engagement grand-policy; Second, good-mode on short term impacts. However, ‘Self-help’ creation in the beneficiary communities could not be achieved. From the findings, it can be concluded that there was no direct-correlation between the weakmanagerial-performance and the relatively good-impact on its beneficiary communities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASEAN Journal of Community Engagement\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASEAN Journal of Community Engagement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7454/ajce.v2i1.119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASEAN Journal of Community Engagement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7454/ajce.v2i1.119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于大学中的大多数社区参与,被视为CO-CD原则的受益人自助影响被忽视了。这项研究的关键问题是回应UT社区参与管理是否执行得当?UT社区参与是否能够对受益社区产生积极影响?本研究设计涵盖了2个集群。第一个是管理业绩问题,第二个是对受益社区的影响因素。使用的方法是调查,数据是使用目的判断和“人口普查”之间的复合抽样收集的。数据分析也是性能分析、上下文输入过程产品和CO-CD概念的结合。研究结果是:首先,定量成就的可信度较低(64%),定性目标的可信度较差。“差距”是由于UT社区参与大政策中没有“CO-CD基础”;第二,良好的模式对短期的影响。然而,无法在受益社区实现“自助”创造。从调查结果可以得出结论,武器审判的表现与其对受益社区的相对良好影响之间没有直接相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Management Performance And Its Impact Analysis On The Beneficiary Community”
For most community engagement in universities, the beneficiary self-help impact as considered as CO-CD principle has been disregarded. The critical issues of this research were to respond whether the UT community-engagement management had been executed properly? and Whether UT community-engagement had been capable of giving positive impacts on the beneficiary communities? This research-design covered 2 clusters. The first was the managerial performance issues, and the second was the impact factors on the beneficiary communities. The method used was a Survey, and the data were collected using composite sampling between Purposive Judgment and ‘Census’. The data analysis was also a combination among The Performance Analysis, The Context-Input-Process-Product, and the CO-CD concept. The findings were: First, less-credible (64%) for quantitative achievement, and poor on the qualitative targeting. The “Gap” was due to the absennce of ‘CO-CD base’ on the UT community-engagement grand-policy; Second, good-mode on short term impacts. However, ‘Self-help’ creation in the beneficiary communities could not be achieved. From the findings, it can be concluded that there was no direct-correlation between the weakmanagerial-performance and the relatively good-impact on its beneficiary communities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信