{"title":"管理绩效及其对受益群体的影响分析","authors":"S. Kridasakti","doi":"10.7454/ajce.v2i1.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For most community engagement in universities, the beneficiary self-help impact as considered as CO-CD principle has been disregarded. The critical issues of this research were to respond whether the UT community-engagement management had been executed properly? and Whether UT community-engagement had been capable of giving positive impacts on the beneficiary communities? This research-design covered 2 clusters. The first was the managerial performance issues, and the second was the impact factors on the beneficiary communities. The method used was a Survey, and the data were collected using composite sampling between Purposive Judgment and ‘Census’. The data analysis was also a combination among The Performance Analysis, The Context-Input-Process-Product, and the CO-CD concept. The findings were: First, less-credible (64%) for quantitative achievement, and poor on the qualitative targeting. The “Gap” was due to the absennce of ‘CO-CD base’ on the UT community-engagement grand-policy; Second, good-mode on short term impacts. However, ‘Self-help’ creation in the beneficiary communities could not be achieved. From the findings, it can be concluded that there was no direct-correlation between the weakmanagerial-performance and the relatively good-impact on its beneficiary communities.","PeriodicalId":32959,"journal":{"name":"ASEAN Journal of Community Engagement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Management Performance And Its Impact Analysis On The Beneficiary Community”\",\"authors\":\"S. Kridasakti\",\"doi\":\"10.7454/ajce.v2i1.119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For most community engagement in universities, the beneficiary self-help impact as considered as CO-CD principle has been disregarded. The critical issues of this research were to respond whether the UT community-engagement management had been executed properly? and Whether UT community-engagement had been capable of giving positive impacts on the beneficiary communities? This research-design covered 2 clusters. The first was the managerial performance issues, and the second was the impact factors on the beneficiary communities. The method used was a Survey, and the data were collected using composite sampling between Purposive Judgment and ‘Census’. The data analysis was also a combination among The Performance Analysis, The Context-Input-Process-Product, and the CO-CD concept. The findings were: First, less-credible (64%) for quantitative achievement, and poor on the qualitative targeting. The “Gap” was due to the absennce of ‘CO-CD base’ on the UT community-engagement grand-policy; Second, good-mode on short term impacts. However, ‘Self-help’ creation in the beneficiary communities could not be achieved. From the findings, it can be concluded that there was no direct-correlation between the weakmanagerial-performance and the relatively good-impact on its beneficiary communities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASEAN Journal of Community Engagement\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASEAN Journal of Community Engagement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7454/ajce.v2i1.119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASEAN Journal of Community Engagement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7454/ajce.v2i1.119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
“Management Performance And Its Impact Analysis On The Beneficiary Community”
For most community engagement in universities, the beneficiary self-help impact as considered as CO-CD principle has been disregarded. The critical issues of this research were to respond whether the UT community-engagement management had been executed properly? and Whether UT community-engagement had been capable of giving positive impacts on the beneficiary communities? This research-design covered 2 clusters. The first was the managerial performance issues, and the second was the impact factors on the beneficiary communities. The method used was a Survey, and the data were collected using composite sampling between Purposive Judgment and ‘Census’. The data analysis was also a combination among The Performance Analysis, The Context-Input-Process-Product, and the CO-CD concept. The findings were: First, less-credible (64%) for quantitative achievement, and poor on the qualitative targeting. The “Gap” was due to the absennce of ‘CO-CD base’ on the UT community-engagement grand-policy; Second, good-mode on short term impacts. However, ‘Self-help’ creation in the beneficiary communities could not be achieved. From the findings, it can be concluded that there was no direct-correlation between the weakmanagerial-performance and the relatively good-impact on its beneficiary communities.