黄色还是透明?橄榄农业生态系统中监测功能节肢动物多样性的粘性陷阱的比较

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
A. Dimitrova, M. Milošević, T. Spanos, I. Livieratos, Vasileios Gkisakis
{"title":"黄色还是透明?橄榄农业生态系统中监测功能节肢动物多样性的粘性陷阱的比较","authors":"A. Dimitrova, M. Milošević, T. Spanos, I. Livieratos, Vasileios Gkisakis","doi":"10.32800/abc.2020.43.0159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEl valor de una comunidad de artropodos diversa y equilibrada en el dosel de los olivares se ha descrito con frecuencia, no obstante, no siempre se ha definido debidamente una metodologia adecuada para determinar dicho valor. Durante dos anos se estudiaron los artropodos del dosel de un olivar mediante trampas adhesivas amarillas y transparentes. Para comparar ambos tipos de trampa, se utilizaron los indices de abundancia, riqueza y diversidad, la distribucion de la abundancia de las especies y la agregacion de taxones en grupos funcionales segun los servicios agroecosistemicos considerados prioritarios. Aparecieron diferencias en la abundancia total y varios taxones, y las trampas amarillas presentaron la mayor abundancia esperada, sin embargo, las trampas transparentes mostraron una comunidad de artropodos del dosel con un grado parecido de diversidad y uniformidad. Utilizar trampas adhesivas transparentes como metodo de bajo costo, susceptible de ser reproducido y que exige menos trabajo puede resultar adecuado para determinar la biodiversidad sin perjudicar a la comunidad de artropodos en su conjunto. EnglishA diverse and balanced arthropod community is known to play an important role in the olive canopy but monitoring methods are not always well defined. We monitored canopy arthropods in an olive orchard over two years, comparing the performance of yellow sticky traps and transparent sticky traps. Data used to compare the two types of traps were arthropod abundance, richness, diversity indices, species abundance distribution and aggregation of taxa in functional groups based on prioritized agroecosystem services. The total abundance of arthropods caught in the yellow traps was higher than that in the transparent traps but diversity in both traps was similar. Transparent traps may therefore be a valid option to assess biodiversity in an olive agrosystem as besides being less labor demanding than yellow traps, they are low cost and replicable, and do not damage the overall arthropod.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Yellow or transparent? Comparison of sticky traps for monitoring functional arthropod diversity in an olive agroecosystem\",\"authors\":\"A. Dimitrova, M. Milošević, T. Spanos, I. Livieratos, Vasileios Gkisakis\",\"doi\":\"10.32800/abc.2020.43.0159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"espanolEl valor de una comunidad de artropodos diversa y equilibrada en el dosel de los olivares se ha descrito con frecuencia, no obstante, no siempre se ha definido debidamente una metodologia adecuada para determinar dicho valor. Durante dos anos se estudiaron los artropodos del dosel de un olivar mediante trampas adhesivas amarillas y transparentes. Para comparar ambos tipos de trampa, se utilizaron los indices de abundancia, riqueza y diversidad, la distribucion de la abundancia de las especies y la agregacion de taxones en grupos funcionales segun los servicios agroecosistemicos considerados prioritarios. Aparecieron diferencias en la abundancia total y varios taxones, y las trampas amarillas presentaron la mayor abundancia esperada, sin embargo, las trampas transparentes mostraron una comunidad de artropodos del dosel con un grado parecido de diversidad y uniformidad. Utilizar trampas adhesivas transparentes como metodo de bajo costo, susceptible de ser reproducido y que exige menos trabajo puede resultar adecuado para determinar la biodiversidad sin perjudicar a la comunidad de artropodos en su conjunto. EnglishA diverse and balanced arthropod community is known to play an important role in the olive canopy but monitoring methods are not always well defined. We monitored canopy arthropods in an olive orchard over two years, comparing the performance of yellow sticky traps and transparent sticky traps. Data used to compare the two types of traps were arthropod abundance, richness, diversity indices, species abundance distribution and aggregation of taxa in functional groups based on prioritized agroecosystem services. The total abundance of arthropods caught in the yellow traps was higher than that in the transparent traps but diversity in both traps was similar. Transparent traps may therefore be a valid option to assess biodiversity in an olive agrosystem as besides being less labor demanding than yellow traps, they are low cost and replicable, and do not damage the overall arthropod.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2020.43.0159\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2020.43.0159","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

然而,橄榄林冠层中多样化和平衡的节肢动物群落的西班牙价值经常被描述,但确定这一价值的适当方法并不总是得到适当定义。两年来,通过黄色和透明的粘附陷阱研究了橄榄树冠上的节肢动物。为了比较这两种类型的陷阱,根据被认为是优先事项的农业生态系统服务,使用了丰度、丰富度和多样性指数、物种丰度分布和分类群在功能组中的聚集。总丰度和几个分类群出现了差异,黄色陷阱的丰度达到了预期的最高水平,但透明陷阱显示出一个具有相似程度的多样性和均匀性的冠层节肢动物群落。使用透明的粘附陷阱作为一种低成本、易于繁殖、需要较少工作的方法,可能适合在不损害整个节肢动物群落的情况下确定生物多样性。众所周知,英语多样性和平衡的节肢动物群落在橄榄冠层中发挥着重要作用,但监测方法并不总是得到很好的定义。我们在橄榄园监测了两年多的冠状病毒,比较了黄色粘着陷阱和透明粘着陷阱的性能。用于比较这两种陷阱的数据是节肢动物丰度、丰度、多样性指数、物种丰度分布和基于优先农业生态系统服务的功能群中分类群的聚集。在黄色陷阱中捕获的节肢动物的总丰度高于透明陷阱,但两个陷阱的多样性相似。因此,透明陷阱可能是评估橄榄农业系统生物多样性的有效选择,因为除了劳动力需求比黄色陷阱少外,它们成本低且可复制,不会损害整个节肢动物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Yellow or transparent? Comparison of sticky traps for monitoring functional arthropod diversity in an olive agroecosystem
espanolEl valor de una comunidad de artropodos diversa y equilibrada en el dosel de los olivares se ha descrito con frecuencia, no obstante, no siempre se ha definido debidamente una metodologia adecuada para determinar dicho valor. Durante dos anos se estudiaron los artropodos del dosel de un olivar mediante trampas adhesivas amarillas y transparentes. Para comparar ambos tipos de trampa, se utilizaron los indices de abundancia, riqueza y diversidad, la distribucion de la abundancia de las especies y la agregacion de taxones en grupos funcionales segun los servicios agroecosistemicos considerados prioritarios. Aparecieron diferencias en la abundancia total y varios taxones, y las trampas amarillas presentaron la mayor abundancia esperada, sin embargo, las trampas transparentes mostraron una comunidad de artropodos del dosel con un grado parecido de diversidad y uniformidad. Utilizar trampas adhesivas transparentes como metodo de bajo costo, susceptible de ser reproducido y que exige menos trabajo puede resultar adecuado para determinar la biodiversidad sin perjudicar a la comunidad de artropodos en su conjunto. EnglishA diverse and balanced arthropod community is known to play an important role in the olive canopy but monitoring methods are not always well defined. We monitored canopy arthropods in an olive orchard over two years, comparing the performance of yellow sticky traps and transparent sticky traps. Data used to compare the two types of traps were arthropod abundance, richness, diversity indices, species abundance distribution and aggregation of taxa in functional groups based on prioritized agroecosystem services. The total abundance of arthropods caught in the yellow traps was higher than that in the transparent traps but diversity in both traps was similar. Transparent traps may therefore be a valid option to assess biodiversity in an olive agrosystem as besides being less labor demanding than yellow traps, they are low cost and replicable, and do not damage the overall arthropod.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信