评估定标方法和模式结构对加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省Cheakamus河流域冰川水文模拟的影响

IF 3.1 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Kai Tsuruta, Markus A. Schnorbus
{"title":"评估定标方法和模式结构对加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省Cheakamus河流域冰川水文模拟的影响","authors":"Kai Tsuruta,&nbsp;Markus A. Schnorbus","doi":"10.1016/j.hydroa.2022.100144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As glaciers across the world continue to recede, there is a concern that their loss as a fresh water reservoir within mountainous basins will have a negative impact on stream temperatures and downstream water resources. Currently, there are relatively few glacio-hydrological models (GHMs) appropriate to study such phenomena and studies that have used GHMs generally acknowledge the high uncertainty associated with their simulations. Calibration techniques present a particular issue in GHMs as available glacier observations are limited and errors in the glacierized portion of a basin can be compensated by errors in the non-glacierized portion. Using as a study site the Cheakamus Basin in British Columbia, Canada, we 1) present a new, fully-coupled GHM, 2) analyze the effects different calibration techniques have on the model’s summer streamflow projections, and 3) compare the fully-coupled GHM results to projections using a one-way GHM. The calibration techniques studied vary in terms of glacier representation (dynamic/static), and glacier constraint (mass balance/thinning rates/thinning rates and area change). We find projected future climate forcings are sufficiently strong in the Cheakamus Basin so as to generally make the sign and significance of changes to the basin’s hydrology insensitive to the calibration and projection procedures studied. However, the variation among these procedures produces significant changes in the projected magnitude of future hydrological changes and therefore should be carefully considered in studies where precision beyond the sign and significance of change is required. Based on analysis of the variation within each procedure’s set of model outputs, we conclude 1) the two-way GHM has benefits over the one-way model, 2) calibration using dynamic glaciers and a thinning rate constraint is preferable for the new GHM, and 3) there is a need for additional studies on the uncertainties associated with the calibration of glacio-hydrological models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology X","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100144"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589915522000268/pdfft?md5=e23db7d26e8d79936590c3f88b49b791&pid=1-s2.0-S2589915522000268-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the influence of calibration methodology and model structure on glacio-hydrological simulations in the Cheakamus River Basin, British Columbia, Canada\",\"authors\":\"Kai Tsuruta,&nbsp;Markus A. Schnorbus\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hydroa.2022.100144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>As glaciers across the world continue to recede, there is a concern that their loss as a fresh water reservoir within mountainous basins will have a negative impact on stream temperatures and downstream water resources. Currently, there are relatively few glacio-hydrological models (GHMs) appropriate to study such phenomena and studies that have used GHMs generally acknowledge the high uncertainty associated with their simulations. Calibration techniques present a particular issue in GHMs as available glacier observations are limited and errors in the glacierized portion of a basin can be compensated by errors in the non-glacierized portion. Using as a study site the Cheakamus Basin in British Columbia, Canada, we 1) present a new, fully-coupled GHM, 2) analyze the effects different calibration techniques have on the model’s summer streamflow projections, and 3) compare the fully-coupled GHM results to projections using a one-way GHM. The calibration techniques studied vary in terms of glacier representation (dynamic/static), and glacier constraint (mass balance/thinning rates/thinning rates and area change). We find projected future climate forcings are sufficiently strong in the Cheakamus Basin so as to generally make the sign and significance of changes to the basin’s hydrology insensitive to the calibration and projection procedures studied. However, the variation among these procedures produces significant changes in the projected magnitude of future hydrological changes and therefore should be carefully considered in studies where precision beyond the sign and significance of change is required. Based on analysis of the variation within each procedure’s set of model outputs, we conclude 1) the two-way GHM has benefits over the one-way model, 2) calibration using dynamic glaciers and a thinning rate constraint is preferable for the new GHM, and 3) there is a need for additional studies on the uncertainties associated with the calibration of glacio-hydrological models.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology X\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589915522000268/pdfft?md5=e23db7d26e8d79936590c3f88b49b791&pid=1-s2.0-S2589915522000268-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589915522000268\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589915522000268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着世界各地的冰川继续消退,人们担心它们作为山区盆地内淡水水库的丧失将对河流温度和下游水资源产生负面影响。目前,适合研究这种现象的冰川水文模型(ghm)相对较少,使用ghm的研究通常承认其模拟具有很高的不确定性。校准技术在ghm中提出了一个特殊的问题,因为可用的冰川观测是有限的,而且盆地冰川化部分的误差可以通过非冰川化部分的误差来补偿。以加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省Cheakamus盆地为研究点,我们1)提出了一个新的全耦合GHM, 2)分析了不同校准技术对模式夏季流量预估的影响,3)将全耦合GHM结果与使用单向GHM预估的结果进行了比较。所研究的校准技术在冰川表征(动态/静态)和冰川约束(质量平衡/变薄率/变薄率和面积变化)方面有所不同。我们发现在Cheakamus流域预估的未来气候强迫是足够强的,因此通常使得流域水文变化的标志和意义对所研究的校准和预估程序不敏感。然而,这些程序之间的差异会对未来水文变化的预估幅度产生重大变化,因此在需要超出变化符号和意义的精度的研究中应仔细考虑。基于对每个过程的模型输出集的变化分析,我们得出结论:1)双向GHM比单向模式更有利;2)使用动态冰川和变薄速率约束进行校准更适合新的GHM; 3)需要对冰川水文模型校准相关的不确定性进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the influence of calibration methodology and model structure on glacio-hydrological simulations in the Cheakamus River Basin, British Columbia, Canada

As glaciers across the world continue to recede, there is a concern that their loss as a fresh water reservoir within mountainous basins will have a negative impact on stream temperatures and downstream water resources. Currently, there are relatively few glacio-hydrological models (GHMs) appropriate to study such phenomena and studies that have used GHMs generally acknowledge the high uncertainty associated with their simulations. Calibration techniques present a particular issue in GHMs as available glacier observations are limited and errors in the glacierized portion of a basin can be compensated by errors in the non-glacierized portion. Using as a study site the Cheakamus Basin in British Columbia, Canada, we 1) present a new, fully-coupled GHM, 2) analyze the effects different calibration techniques have on the model’s summer streamflow projections, and 3) compare the fully-coupled GHM results to projections using a one-way GHM. The calibration techniques studied vary in terms of glacier representation (dynamic/static), and glacier constraint (mass balance/thinning rates/thinning rates and area change). We find projected future climate forcings are sufficiently strong in the Cheakamus Basin so as to generally make the sign and significance of changes to the basin’s hydrology insensitive to the calibration and projection procedures studied. However, the variation among these procedures produces significant changes in the projected magnitude of future hydrological changes and therefore should be carefully considered in studies where precision beyond the sign and significance of change is required. Based on analysis of the variation within each procedure’s set of model outputs, we conclude 1) the two-way GHM has benefits over the one-way model, 2) calibration using dynamic glaciers and a thinning rate constraint is preferable for the new GHM, and 3) there is a need for additional studies on the uncertainties associated with the calibration of glacio-hydrological models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology X
Journal of Hydrology X Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
20
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信