“为什么他们想让别人承受他们所承受的痛苦?”微博上关于新/非自由中国分娩镇痛的争论

IF 1.4 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Wenxue Zou, C. Wallis
{"title":"“为什么他们想让别人承受他们所承受的痛苦?”微博上关于新/非自由中国分娩镇痛的争论","authors":"Wenxue Zou, C. Wallis","doi":"10.1080/07491409.2021.1947925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article, we examine the cultural and gendered understandings of labor pain and the underlying obstacles that prevent Chinese women from seeking pain relief during labor and exercising their own autonomy. We conducted a critical discourse analysis of 178 posts containing the phrase wutong fenmian (literally “painless labor”) on Weibo, a popular Chinese microblogging platform. By situating our analysis in the contemporary context we call “neo/non-liberal China,” where traditional Chinese thought, market socialism, and a therapeutic mode of governance intertwine, we identify four major themes: traditional thinking rooted in Confucianism; health concerns for mother and child; women’s empowerment and control of reproduction; and structural issues within China’s healthcare system. We argue that Weibo discourses reflect young women’s resistance to Chinese traditional gender ideologies and reveal their strong yearning for self-determination and self-care even as their reproductive “choice” is limited by numerous relational and institutional constraints.","PeriodicalId":46136,"journal":{"name":"Womens Studies in Communication","volume":"45 1","pages":"143 - 162"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Why do They Want Others to Suffer the Same Pain They Have Endured?” Weibo Debates about Pain Relief during Childbirth in Neo/Non-Liberal China\",\"authors\":\"Wenxue Zou, C. Wallis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07491409.2021.1947925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this article, we examine the cultural and gendered understandings of labor pain and the underlying obstacles that prevent Chinese women from seeking pain relief during labor and exercising their own autonomy. We conducted a critical discourse analysis of 178 posts containing the phrase wutong fenmian (literally “painless labor”) on Weibo, a popular Chinese microblogging platform. By situating our analysis in the contemporary context we call “neo/non-liberal China,” where traditional Chinese thought, market socialism, and a therapeutic mode of governance intertwine, we identify four major themes: traditional thinking rooted in Confucianism; health concerns for mother and child; women’s empowerment and control of reproduction; and structural issues within China’s healthcare system. We argue that Weibo discourses reflect young women’s resistance to Chinese traditional gender ideologies and reveal their strong yearning for self-determination and self-care even as their reproductive “choice” is limited by numerous relational and institutional constraints.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Womens Studies in Communication\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"143 - 162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Womens Studies in Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2021.1947925\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Studies in Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2021.1947925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在这篇文章中,我们研究了文化和性别对分娩疼痛的理解,以及阻碍中国女性在分娩过程中寻求疼痛缓解和行使自主的潜在障碍。我们对中国流行的微博平台微博上178条包含无痛分娩(字面意思是“无痛分娩”)的微博进行了批判性话语分析。通过将我们的分析置于我们称之为“新/非自由中国”的当代语境中,在这个语境中,中国传统思想、市场社会主义和一种治理模式交织在一起,我们确定了四个主要主题:植根于儒家思想的传统思想;母亲和儿童的健康问题;赋予妇女权力和控制生育;以及中国医疗体系的结构性问题。我们认为,微博话语反映了年轻女性对中国传统性别意识形态的反抗,揭示了她们对自我决定和自我照顾的强烈渴望,尽管她们的生殖“选择”受到众多关系和制度约束的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Why do They Want Others to Suffer the Same Pain They Have Endured?” Weibo Debates about Pain Relief during Childbirth in Neo/Non-Liberal China
Abstract In this article, we examine the cultural and gendered understandings of labor pain and the underlying obstacles that prevent Chinese women from seeking pain relief during labor and exercising their own autonomy. We conducted a critical discourse analysis of 178 posts containing the phrase wutong fenmian (literally “painless labor”) on Weibo, a popular Chinese microblogging platform. By situating our analysis in the contemporary context we call “neo/non-liberal China,” where traditional Chinese thought, market socialism, and a therapeutic mode of governance intertwine, we identify four major themes: traditional thinking rooted in Confucianism; health concerns for mother and child; women’s empowerment and control of reproduction; and structural issues within China’s healthcare system. We argue that Weibo discourses reflect young women’s resistance to Chinese traditional gender ideologies and reveal their strong yearning for self-determination and self-care even as their reproductive “choice” is limited by numerous relational and institutional constraints.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信