大口径异体神经移植物修复上肢神经损伤的初步评价

The Hand Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1558944716646782
J. Isaacs, B. Safa
{"title":"大口径异体神经移植物修复上肢神经损伤的初步评价","authors":"J. Isaacs, B. Safa","doi":"10.1177/1558944716646782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cabled sensory nerve autografts are the historical gold standard for overcoming gaps in larger diameter nerves as repair utilizing large-diameter autograft risks central graft necrosis. Commercially available processed nerve allograft (PNA) is available in diameters up to 5 mm but represents an acellular 3-dimensional matrix as opposed to viable tissue. The purpose of this study is to specifically evaluate whether similar concerns regarding the use of large-caliber PNA are warranted. Methods: The RANGER Registry is an active database designed to collect injury, repair, safety, and outcomes data for PNAs (Avance® Nerve Graft; AxoGen, Inc, Alachua, Florida) according to an institutional review board–approved protocol. The database was queried for patients presenting with large-caliber nerve allograft repairs in the upper extremity. Identified patients reporting quantitative outcomes with a minimum of 9-month follow-up were included in the data set. Results: The large-caliber PNA subgroup included 13 patients with 15 injuries. The mean ± SD age was 36 ± 22 years. Large-caliber single-stranded repairs included twelve 4- to 5-mm-diameter grafts. Large-caliber cabled repairs included the combined use of 3- to 4-mm and 4- to 5-mm-diameter nerve allografts in 3 repairs. The mean nerve gap was 33 ± 10 mm with a mean follow-up time of 13 months. Available quantitative data reported meaningful recovery of sensory and motor function in 67% and 85% of the repairs, respectively. Conclusion: Although based on a small subset of patients, PNAs of up to 5 mm in diameter appear capable of supporting successful nerve regeneration.","PeriodicalId":76630,"journal":{"name":"The Hand","volume":"12 1","pages":"55 - 59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1558944716646782","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Preliminary Assessment of the Utility of Large-Caliber Processed Nerve Allografts for the Repair of Upper Extremity Nerve Injuries\",\"authors\":\"J. Isaacs, B. Safa\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1558944716646782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Cabled sensory nerve autografts are the historical gold standard for overcoming gaps in larger diameter nerves as repair utilizing large-diameter autograft risks central graft necrosis. Commercially available processed nerve allograft (PNA) is available in diameters up to 5 mm but represents an acellular 3-dimensional matrix as opposed to viable tissue. The purpose of this study is to specifically evaluate whether similar concerns regarding the use of large-caliber PNA are warranted. Methods: The RANGER Registry is an active database designed to collect injury, repair, safety, and outcomes data for PNAs (Avance® Nerve Graft; AxoGen, Inc, Alachua, Florida) according to an institutional review board–approved protocol. The database was queried for patients presenting with large-caliber nerve allograft repairs in the upper extremity. Identified patients reporting quantitative outcomes with a minimum of 9-month follow-up were included in the data set. Results: The large-caliber PNA subgroup included 13 patients with 15 injuries. The mean ± SD age was 36 ± 22 years. Large-caliber single-stranded repairs included twelve 4- to 5-mm-diameter grafts. Large-caliber cabled repairs included the combined use of 3- to 4-mm and 4- to 5-mm-diameter nerve allografts in 3 repairs. The mean nerve gap was 33 ± 10 mm with a mean follow-up time of 13 months. Available quantitative data reported meaningful recovery of sensory and motor function in 67% and 85% of the repairs, respectively. Conclusion: Although based on a small subset of patients, PNAs of up to 5 mm in diameter appear capable of supporting successful nerve regeneration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Hand\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"55 - 59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1558944716646782\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Hand\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944716646782\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Hand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944716646782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

摘要

背景:带电缆的自体感觉神经移植物是克服大直径神经间隙的历史黄金标准,因为使用大直径自体移植物进行修复有导致中枢移植物坏死的风险。市售的经处理的同种异体神经(PNA)的直径可达5mm,但与活组织相比,它代表了一种无细胞的三维基质。本研究的目的是具体评估是否有必要对大口径PNA的使用提出类似的担忧。方法:RANGER注册表是一个活跃的数据库,旨在根据机构审查委员会批准的方案收集PNA(Avance®神经移植;AxoGen,Inc,Alachua,Florida)的损伤、修复、安全性和结果数据。数据库中查询了上肢大口径同种异体神经修复的患者。已确定的患者报告了至少9个月随访的定量结果,这些患者被纳入数据集中。结果:大口径PNA亚组包括13例患者和15例损伤。平均±SD年龄为36±22岁。大口径单链修复包括12个直径4至5毫米的移植物。大口径有线修复包括在3次修复中联合使用直径为3至4毫米和4至5毫米的同种异体神经移植物。平均神经间隙为33±10mm,平均随访时间为13个月。现有的定量数据显示,67%和85%的修复中感觉和运动功能得到了有意义的恢复。结论:尽管基于一小部分患者,直径高达5毫米的PNA似乎能够支持成功的神经再生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Preliminary Assessment of the Utility of Large-Caliber Processed Nerve Allografts for the Repair of Upper Extremity Nerve Injuries
Background: Cabled sensory nerve autografts are the historical gold standard for overcoming gaps in larger diameter nerves as repair utilizing large-diameter autograft risks central graft necrosis. Commercially available processed nerve allograft (PNA) is available in diameters up to 5 mm but represents an acellular 3-dimensional matrix as opposed to viable tissue. The purpose of this study is to specifically evaluate whether similar concerns regarding the use of large-caliber PNA are warranted. Methods: The RANGER Registry is an active database designed to collect injury, repair, safety, and outcomes data for PNAs (Avance® Nerve Graft; AxoGen, Inc, Alachua, Florida) according to an institutional review board–approved protocol. The database was queried for patients presenting with large-caliber nerve allograft repairs in the upper extremity. Identified patients reporting quantitative outcomes with a minimum of 9-month follow-up were included in the data set. Results: The large-caliber PNA subgroup included 13 patients with 15 injuries. The mean ± SD age was 36 ± 22 years. Large-caliber single-stranded repairs included twelve 4- to 5-mm-diameter grafts. Large-caliber cabled repairs included the combined use of 3- to 4-mm and 4- to 5-mm-diameter nerve allografts in 3 repairs. The mean nerve gap was 33 ± 10 mm with a mean follow-up time of 13 months. Available quantitative data reported meaningful recovery of sensory and motor function in 67% and 85% of the repairs, respectively. Conclusion: Although based on a small subset of patients, PNAs of up to 5 mm in diameter appear capable of supporting successful nerve regeneration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信