非织造吸附剂吸油性能的比较

IF 0.6 4区 工程技术 Q4 MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES
Peilin Jiang, Lihua Lou, S. Ramkumar
{"title":"非织造吸附剂吸油性能的比较","authors":"Peilin Jiang, Lihua Lou, S. Ramkumar","doi":"10.1177/24723444221132053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Oil sorption capacity is one of the essential parameters to evaluate the practical performances of oil sorbent products. This study aims to compare the dynamic oil sorption capacity of industrial nonwoven sorbents, which were fabricated through the carding process, spun-bond technology, and composite processes. The oil sorbents were produced by polypropylene fibers or cotton fibers with different surface wettability. The study showed that raw cotton layers exhibited a higher oil sorption capacity than the other three samples: eight-layer thermal-bonded melt-blown polypropylene fiber nonwoven, polypropylene fibers on top and bottom with raw cotton layers in the middle, and polypropylene fiber melt-blown nonwovens. Comparatively, eight-layer thermal-bonded melt-blown polypropylene fiber nonwoven had the lowest oil sorption capacity. Moreover, the hydrophilic property can significantly enhance the water pick-up capacity of sorbents on both dynamic and static systems but reduce the maximum oil sorption ability. Overall, the major factors determining a nonwoven fabric’s oil absorption performance are its fiber type, surface wettability, and hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity. Specifically, raw cotton, polypropylene fibers, or polypropylene fiber/cotton composite oil sorbents with low hydrophobicity and high hydrophobicity will contribute to high oil absorption ability. The advantage of raw cotton over polypropylene fibers is 3–7 times higher in oil absorption capability, environmentally friendliness, and sustainability, attributed to their hydrophobic ingredients, including pectin and waxes. From a structure angle, products with a loose structure and good mechanical properties ensure a balance between service life and oil absorption performance. Graphical abstract This research is to analyze the effect of fiber types, the structure of sorbents, and surface wettability on nonwoven oil sorption capabilities. We compared the oil sorption capacity of multiple nonwoven sorbents, which were fabricated through the carding process, spun-bond technology, and composite processes. The oil sorbents were produced by polypropylene fibers or cotton fibers with different surface wettability. Their dynamic and static hydrophilic properties and their associations with oil sorption capabilities were examined.","PeriodicalId":6955,"journal":{"name":"AATCC Journal of Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Oil Sorption Capacity of Nonwoven Sorbents\",\"authors\":\"Peilin Jiang, Lihua Lou, S. Ramkumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/24723444221132053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Oil sorption capacity is one of the essential parameters to evaluate the practical performances of oil sorbent products. This study aims to compare the dynamic oil sorption capacity of industrial nonwoven sorbents, which were fabricated through the carding process, spun-bond technology, and composite processes. The oil sorbents were produced by polypropylene fibers or cotton fibers with different surface wettability. The study showed that raw cotton layers exhibited a higher oil sorption capacity than the other three samples: eight-layer thermal-bonded melt-blown polypropylene fiber nonwoven, polypropylene fibers on top and bottom with raw cotton layers in the middle, and polypropylene fiber melt-blown nonwovens. Comparatively, eight-layer thermal-bonded melt-blown polypropylene fiber nonwoven had the lowest oil sorption capacity. Moreover, the hydrophilic property can significantly enhance the water pick-up capacity of sorbents on both dynamic and static systems but reduce the maximum oil sorption ability. Overall, the major factors determining a nonwoven fabric’s oil absorption performance are its fiber type, surface wettability, and hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity. Specifically, raw cotton, polypropylene fibers, or polypropylene fiber/cotton composite oil sorbents with low hydrophobicity and high hydrophobicity will contribute to high oil absorption ability. The advantage of raw cotton over polypropylene fibers is 3–7 times higher in oil absorption capability, environmentally friendliness, and sustainability, attributed to their hydrophobic ingredients, including pectin and waxes. From a structure angle, products with a loose structure and good mechanical properties ensure a balance between service life and oil absorption performance. Graphical abstract This research is to analyze the effect of fiber types, the structure of sorbents, and surface wettability on nonwoven oil sorption capabilities. We compared the oil sorption capacity of multiple nonwoven sorbents, which were fabricated through the carding process, spun-bond technology, and composite processes. The oil sorbents were produced by polypropylene fibers or cotton fibers with different surface wettability. Their dynamic and static hydrophilic properties and their associations with oil sorption capabilities were examined.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AATCC Journal of Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AATCC Journal of Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/24723444221132053\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AATCC Journal of Research","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24723444221132053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

吸油性能是评价吸油剂产品实用性能的重要参数之一。本研究的目的是比较工业无纺布吸附剂的动态吸油能力,通过梳理工艺、纺粘工艺和复合工艺制备。采用表面润湿性不同的聚丙烯纤维和棉纤维制备吸油剂。研究表明,原棉层的吸油能力高于其他3种样品:8层热粘合熔喷聚丙烯纤维非织造布,顶部和底部为聚丙烯纤维,中间为原棉层,以及聚丙烯纤维熔喷非织造布。相比之下,八层热粘合熔喷聚丙烯纤维非织造布的吸油能力最低。此外,在动态和静态体系中,吸附剂的亲水性都能显著提高吸附剂的吸水能力,但会降低吸附剂的最大吸油能力。总的来说,决定非织造布吸油性能的主要因素是其纤维类型、表面润湿性和疏/亲水性。具体来说,原棉、聚丙烯纤维或聚丙烯纤维/棉复合吸油剂的低疏水性和高疏水性将有助于提高吸油能力。原棉的吸油能力、环保性和可持续性是聚丙烯纤维的3-7倍,这要归功于其疏水成分,包括果胶和蜡。从结构角度看,结构松散、机械性能好的产品,保证了使用寿命和吸油性能之间的平衡。摘要本研究分析了纤维种类、吸附剂结构和表面润湿性对非织造布吸油性能的影响。比较了通过梳理工艺、纺粘工艺和复合工艺制备的多种非织造布吸附剂的吸油性能。采用表面润湿性不同的聚丙烯纤维和棉纤维制备吸油剂。研究了它们的动态和静态亲水性及其与吸油能力的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Oil Sorption Capacity of Nonwoven Sorbents
Oil sorption capacity is one of the essential parameters to evaluate the practical performances of oil sorbent products. This study aims to compare the dynamic oil sorption capacity of industrial nonwoven sorbents, which were fabricated through the carding process, spun-bond technology, and composite processes. The oil sorbents were produced by polypropylene fibers or cotton fibers with different surface wettability. The study showed that raw cotton layers exhibited a higher oil sorption capacity than the other three samples: eight-layer thermal-bonded melt-blown polypropylene fiber nonwoven, polypropylene fibers on top and bottom with raw cotton layers in the middle, and polypropylene fiber melt-blown nonwovens. Comparatively, eight-layer thermal-bonded melt-blown polypropylene fiber nonwoven had the lowest oil sorption capacity. Moreover, the hydrophilic property can significantly enhance the water pick-up capacity of sorbents on both dynamic and static systems but reduce the maximum oil sorption ability. Overall, the major factors determining a nonwoven fabric’s oil absorption performance are its fiber type, surface wettability, and hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity. Specifically, raw cotton, polypropylene fibers, or polypropylene fiber/cotton composite oil sorbents with low hydrophobicity and high hydrophobicity will contribute to high oil absorption ability. The advantage of raw cotton over polypropylene fibers is 3–7 times higher in oil absorption capability, environmentally friendliness, and sustainability, attributed to their hydrophobic ingredients, including pectin and waxes. From a structure angle, products with a loose structure and good mechanical properties ensure a balance between service life and oil absorption performance. Graphical abstract This research is to analyze the effect of fiber types, the structure of sorbents, and surface wettability on nonwoven oil sorption capabilities. We compared the oil sorption capacity of multiple nonwoven sorbents, which were fabricated through the carding process, spun-bond technology, and composite processes. The oil sorbents were produced by polypropylene fibers or cotton fibers with different surface wettability. Their dynamic and static hydrophilic properties and their associations with oil sorption capabilities were examined.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AATCC Journal of Research
AATCC Journal of Research MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: AATCC Journal of Research. This textile research journal has a broad scope: from advanced materials, fibers, and textile and polymer chemistry, to color science, apparel design, and sustainability. Now indexed by Science Citation Index Extended (SCIE) and discoverable in the Clarivate Analytics Web of Science Core Collection! The Journal’s impact factor is available in Journal Citation Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信