“倾听内心世界”:激进异议和“热情”的埃克哈特根源

IF 0.3 0 RELIGION
M. L. Anderson
{"title":"“倾听内心世界”:激进异议和“热情”的埃克哈特根源","authors":"M. L. Anderson","doi":"10.1080/20465726.2020.1840097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper will focus on the progenitorial influence of Meister Eckhart’s mystical thought and its theological and historiographical legacy vis-à-vis his own writings and those of his disciples, Johannes Tauler and Henry Suso, including the mystical treatises influenced by them, the Theologia Deutsch among them. It will contextualize the intrigue with late-medieval German mysticism among sixteenth-century ‘radical’ reformers, who ironically have been called the ‘unruly offspring of Luther.’ In particular, it will provide a succinct overview of how the constellation of mystical teachings integral to Eckhart’s theology of the Word were selectively appropriated by radicals and ‘Spiritualists’ like Thomas Müntzer, Andreas Bodenstein von Karlstadt, Sebastian Franck, Valentin Weigel and others who reconceptualized and prioritized the authority of the Inner Word over the Outer Word. Because they confused the proper ordering of external and internal divine revelation, many of them were condemned and vilified by Luther as Schwärmer (‘enthusiasts’) ─as if ‘swarmed’ by bees.","PeriodicalId":40432,"journal":{"name":"Medieval Mystical Theology","volume":"29 1","pages":"63 - 78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20465726.2020.1840097","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Hearing the Inner Word’: The Eckhartian Roots of Radical Dissent and ‘Enthusiasm’\",\"authors\":\"M. L. Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20465726.2020.1840097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper will focus on the progenitorial influence of Meister Eckhart’s mystical thought and its theological and historiographical legacy vis-à-vis his own writings and those of his disciples, Johannes Tauler and Henry Suso, including the mystical treatises influenced by them, the Theologia Deutsch among them. It will contextualize the intrigue with late-medieval German mysticism among sixteenth-century ‘radical’ reformers, who ironically have been called the ‘unruly offspring of Luther.’ In particular, it will provide a succinct overview of how the constellation of mystical teachings integral to Eckhart’s theology of the Word were selectively appropriated by radicals and ‘Spiritualists’ like Thomas Müntzer, Andreas Bodenstein von Karlstadt, Sebastian Franck, Valentin Weigel and others who reconceptualized and prioritized the authority of the Inner Word over the Outer Word. Because they confused the proper ordering of external and internal divine revelation, many of them were condemned and vilified by Luther as Schwärmer (‘enthusiasts’) ─as if ‘swarmed’ by bees.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medieval Mystical Theology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"63 - 78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20465726.2020.1840097\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medieval Mystical Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20465726.2020.1840097\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medieval Mystical Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20465726.2020.1840097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将重点研究埃克哈特神秘主义思想的先祖影响及其在神学和史学上的遗产,包括他自己和他的门徒约翰内斯·陶勒和亨利·苏索的著作,包括受他们影响的神秘主义论文,其中包括《德意志神学》。它将把16世纪“激进”改革家的阴谋与中世纪晚期德国神秘主义联系起来,这些改革家被讽刺地称为“路德的不羁后代”。特别地,它将提供一个简洁的概述,关于埃克哈特的世界神学中不可分割的神秘教义是如何被激进派和“唯心主义者”有选择性地利用的,比如托马斯·梅茨尔、安德烈亚斯·博登斯坦·冯·卡尔施塔特、塞巴斯蒂安·弗兰克、瓦伦丁·魏格尔和其他重新概念化并优先考虑内在世界的权威的人。因为他们混淆了外在和内在神圣启示的正确顺序,他们中的许多人被路德谴责和诋毁为Schwärmer(“发烧友”)──就像被蜜蜂“蜂群”一样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Hearing the Inner Word’: The Eckhartian Roots of Radical Dissent and ‘Enthusiasm’
ABSTRACT This paper will focus on the progenitorial influence of Meister Eckhart’s mystical thought and its theological and historiographical legacy vis-à-vis his own writings and those of his disciples, Johannes Tauler and Henry Suso, including the mystical treatises influenced by them, the Theologia Deutsch among them. It will contextualize the intrigue with late-medieval German mysticism among sixteenth-century ‘radical’ reformers, who ironically have been called the ‘unruly offspring of Luther.’ In particular, it will provide a succinct overview of how the constellation of mystical teachings integral to Eckhart’s theology of the Word were selectively appropriated by radicals and ‘Spiritualists’ like Thomas Müntzer, Andreas Bodenstein von Karlstadt, Sebastian Franck, Valentin Weigel and others who reconceptualized and prioritized the authority of the Inner Word over the Outer Word. Because they confused the proper ordering of external and internal divine revelation, many of them were condemned and vilified by Luther as Schwärmer (‘enthusiasts’) ─as if ‘swarmed’ by bees.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信