书评:欧洲评估的制度化

IF 1.1 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Marlène Laeubli Loud
{"title":"书评:欧洲评估的制度化","authors":"Marlène Laeubli Loud","doi":"10.1177/10982140211067394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The global development of evaluation has steadily increased over the past 50 years. Evaluation has progressively been acknowledged as an important aid for policy making and policy review in the public and private sectors as well as in humanitarian and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). Evaluation has mainly been used to measure “success,” render policies accountable to the public, and draw out important lessons, although its scope of purpose and use has become increasingly diverse over the last few decades. But what, if any, are the rules, norms, and regulations in place to support the evaluation process? And how readily can these be adapted to meet new demands, incorporate innovations, and be employed in new activity domains? In short, how well is evaluation now institutionalized? Such are the questions the editors of The Institutionalisation of Evaluation in Europe set out to answer. This book is the first in a four-volume series aimed at analyzing how well evaluation has become established in different continents around the world. The other three volumes will cover America, Africa, and Asia. While there have been previous publications on the same theme (Furubo et al., 2002; Jacob et al., 2015), this series plans a more comprehensive coverage for each of the four continents and, ultimately, systematic comparisons across countries and continents. The editors developed an analytical framework to structure data collection by the country-specific authors of each chapter to enable both country-to-country comparisons and the synthesis of findings across the chapters. The framework defines “institutionalization” as being comprised of three subsystems: (a) the political system of “institutional structures and processes”; (b) the social system, summarized as “societal dissemination and acceptance of evaluation in civil society”; and (c) the system of professionalization, referring specifically to the professionalization of evaluations (p. 15). This volume analyzes the situation in 16 European countries and the European Union. Country profiles are presented according to the geographical region: Northern, Western, Southern, and Central Eastern Europe. Data collection and analysis principally relied on evaluation specialists from each of the selected countries. The editors recruited chapter authors based on their overall familiarity with the evaluation status quo in the selected countries. To respond to the questions identified in the editors’ framework, authors drew on their personal experience, professional networks, and extensive documentary review. Book Review","PeriodicalId":51449,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Evaluation","volume":"43 1","pages":"148 - 150"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: The Institutionalisation of Evaluation in Europe\",\"authors\":\"Marlène Laeubli Loud\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10982140211067394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The global development of evaluation has steadily increased over the past 50 years. Evaluation has progressively been acknowledged as an important aid for policy making and policy review in the public and private sectors as well as in humanitarian and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). Evaluation has mainly been used to measure “success,” render policies accountable to the public, and draw out important lessons, although its scope of purpose and use has become increasingly diverse over the last few decades. But what, if any, are the rules, norms, and regulations in place to support the evaluation process? And how readily can these be adapted to meet new demands, incorporate innovations, and be employed in new activity domains? In short, how well is evaluation now institutionalized? Such are the questions the editors of The Institutionalisation of Evaluation in Europe set out to answer. This book is the first in a four-volume series aimed at analyzing how well evaluation has become established in different continents around the world. The other three volumes will cover America, Africa, and Asia. While there have been previous publications on the same theme (Furubo et al., 2002; Jacob et al., 2015), this series plans a more comprehensive coverage for each of the four continents and, ultimately, systematic comparisons across countries and continents. The editors developed an analytical framework to structure data collection by the country-specific authors of each chapter to enable both country-to-country comparisons and the synthesis of findings across the chapters. The framework defines “institutionalization” as being comprised of three subsystems: (a) the political system of “institutional structures and processes”; (b) the social system, summarized as “societal dissemination and acceptance of evaluation in civil society”; and (c) the system of professionalization, referring specifically to the professionalization of evaluations (p. 15). This volume analyzes the situation in 16 European countries and the European Union. Country profiles are presented according to the geographical region: Northern, Western, Southern, and Central Eastern Europe. Data collection and analysis principally relied on evaluation specialists from each of the selected countries. The editors recruited chapter authors based on their overall familiarity with the evaluation status quo in the selected countries. To respond to the questions identified in the editors’ framework, authors drew on their personal experience, professional networks, and extensive documentary review. Book Review\",\"PeriodicalId\":51449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"148 - 150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140211067394\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140211067394","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的50年里,评估的全球发展稳步增长。评价逐渐被认为是公共和私营部门以及人道主义组织和非政府组织的政策制定和政策审查的重要援助。评估主要用于衡量“成功”,使政策对公众负责,并得出重要的教训,尽管其目的和用途范围在过去几十年中变得越来越多样化。但是,如果有的话,支持评估过程的规则、规范和规定是什么呢?这些技术如何适应新的需求、整合创新并应用于新的活动领域?简而言之,评估现在制度化的程度如何?这就是《欧洲评估制度化》的编辑们想要回答的问题。这本书是四卷系列中的第一本,旨在分析评估在世界各大洲的建立情况。另外三卷将涵盖美洲、非洲和亚洲。虽然以前也有关于同一主题的出版物(Furubo et al., 2002;Jacob et al., 2015),本系列计划对四大洲中的每一个进行更全面的覆盖,并最终对各国和各大洲进行系统的比较。编辑们制定了一个分析框架,以组织每章具体国家作者收集的数据,以便进行国与国之间的比较,并综合各章的调查结果。该框架将“制度化”定义为由三个分系统组成:(a)“体制结构和程序”的政治系统;(b)社会制度,概括为“民间社会对评价的社会传播和接受”;(c)职业化制度,具体指评价职业化(第15页)。这本书分析了16个欧洲国家和欧盟的情况。根据地理区域提供国家概况:北欧、西欧、南欧和中东欧。数据收集和分析主要依靠来自每个选定国家的评价专家。编辑根据他们对所选国家评价现状的总体熟悉程度征聘各章作者。为了回答编辑框架中确定的问题,作者利用了他们的个人经验、专业网络和广泛的文献审查。书评
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book Review: The Institutionalisation of Evaluation in Europe
The global development of evaluation has steadily increased over the past 50 years. Evaluation has progressively been acknowledged as an important aid for policy making and policy review in the public and private sectors as well as in humanitarian and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). Evaluation has mainly been used to measure “success,” render policies accountable to the public, and draw out important lessons, although its scope of purpose and use has become increasingly diverse over the last few decades. But what, if any, are the rules, norms, and regulations in place to support the evaluation process? And how readily can these be adapted to meet new demands, incorporate innovations, and be employed in new activity domains? In short, how well is evaluation now institutionalized? Such are the questions the editors of The Institutionalisation of Evaluation in Europe set out to answer. This book is the first in a four-volume series aimed at analyzing how well evaluation has become established in different continents around the world. The other three volumes will cover America, Africa, and Asia. While there have been previous publications on the same theme (Furubo et al., 2002; Jacob et al., 2015), this series plans a more comprehensive coverage for each of the four continents and, ultimately, systematic comparisons across countries and continents. The editors developed an analytical framework to structure data collection by the country-specific authors of each chapter to enable both country-to-country comparisons and the synthesis of findings across the chapters. The framework defines “institutionalization” as being comprised of three subsystems: (a) the political system of “institutional structures and processes”; (b) the social system, summarized as “societal dissemination and acceptance of evaluation in civil society”; and (c) the system of professionalization, referring specifically to the professionalization of evaluations (p. 15). This volume analyzes the situation in 16 European countries and the European Union. Country profiles are presented according to the geographical region: Northern, Western, Southern, and Central Eastern Europe. Data collection and analysis principally relied on evaluation specialists from each of the selected countries. The editors recruited chapter authors based on their overall familiarity with the evaluation status quo in the selected countries. To respond to the questions identified in the editors’ framework, authors drew on their personal experience, professional networks, and extensive documentary review. Book Review
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Evaluation
American Journal of Evaluation SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Evaluation (AJE) publishes original papers about the methods, theory, practice, and findings of evaluation. The general goal of AJE is to present the best work in and about evaluation, in order to improve the knowledge base and practice of its readers. Because the field of evaluation is diverse, with different intellectual traditions, approaches to practice, and domains of application, the papers published in AJE will reflect this diversity. Nevertheless, preference is given to papers that are likely to be of interest to a wide range of evaluators and that are written to be accessible to most readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信