我们需要和一些朋友解除好友关系吗?自由放养的狗影响了印度跨喜马拉雅地区的野生动物和牧民

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
N. Mahar, B. Habib, S. A. Hussain
{"title":"我们需要和一些朋友解除好友关系吗?自由放养的狗影响了印度跨喜马拉雅地区的野生动物和牧民","authors":"N. Mahar,&nbsp;B. Habib,&nbsp;S. A. Hussain","doi":"10.1111/acv.12876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dogs <i>Canis lupus familiaris</i>, among canids, have emerged as the most successful predators and facultative scavengers, and have prevented other carnivores from approaching human habitats through intraguild competition. Over time with increasing population and livestock predation, they have become a matter of concern for pastoralists. The present study was conducted to understand the patterns of free-ranging dogs' predation on livestock and wildlife, from 2015 to 2017 in Changthang Wildlife Sanctuary (CWLS), Ladakh, India. Information was collected on (a) dog populations in 10 sites using polygon search in Spatially Explicit Capture-Recapture framework and block count, (b) their diet using scat analysis (<i>n</i> = 205) and (c) perceptions of pastoralists towards dogs through questionnaire-based interviews (<i>n</i> = 210). Dog densities varied between 10 and 310 individuals/100 km<sup>2</sup> and were high in and around human habitations. A major part of their diet constituted of livestock (74.29%) and wild species (13.06%). Among wild prey species, birds (4.49%), lagomorphs (3.67%), rodents (2.45%) and Tibetan wild ass (1.63%) had high occurrence in dog diet. The local people admitted that dogs pose a threat to livestock and wildlife. As unowned free-ranging dogs harm livestock and wildlife, about 40% of the respondents had negative perceptions towards them. The perception varied with occupation and pastoralists were more negative than non-pastoralists (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). We suggest that effective mechanisms need to be identified or developed to manage dog populations in ecologically and economically sensitive areas to minimise the threats and safeguard the endangered wildlife and local livelihoods.</p>","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"27 1","pages":"53-64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do we need to unfriend a few friends? Free-ranging dogs affect wildlife and pastoralists in the Indian Trans-Himalaya\",\"authors\":\"N. Mahar,&nbsp;B. Habib,&nbsp;S. A. Hussain\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acv.12876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Dogs <i>Canis lupus familiaris</i>, among canids, have emerged as the most successful predators and facultative scavengers, and have prevented other carnivores from approaching human habitats through intraguild competition. Over time with increasing population and livestock predation, they have become a matter of concern for pastoralists. The present study was conducted to understand the patterns of free-ranging dogs' predation on livestock and wildlife, from 2015 to 2017 in Changthang Wildlife Sanctuary (CWLS), Ladakh, India. Information was collected on (a) dog populations in 10 sites using polygon search in Spatially Explicit Capture-Recapture framework and block count, (b) their diet using scat analysis (<i>n</i> = 205) and (c) perceptions of pastoralists towards dogs through questionnaire-based interviews (<i>n</i> = 210). Dog densities varied between 10 and 310 individuals/100 km<sup>2</sup> and were high in and around human habitations. A major part of their diet constituted of livestock (74.29%) and wild species (13.06%). Among wild prey species, birds (4.49%), lagomorphs (3.67%), rodents (2.45%) and Tibetan wild ass (1.63%) had high occurrence in dog diet. The local people admitted that dogs pose a threat to livestock and wildlife. As unowned free-ranging dogs harm livestock and wildlife, about 40% of the respondents had negative perceptions towards them. The perception varied with occupation and pastoralists were more negative than non-pastoralists (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). We suggest that effective mechanisms need to be identified or developed to manage dog populations in ecologically and economically sensitive areas to minimise the threats and safeguard the endangered wildlife and local livelihoods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Conservation\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"53-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acv.12876\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acv.12876","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在犬科动物中,犬科狼狗是最成功的捕食者和食腐动物,它们通过同类竞争阻止其他食肉动物接近人类栖息地。随着人口的增加和牲畜捕食量的增加,它们已成为牧民关注的问题。本研究旨在了解 2015 年至 2017 年印度拉达克昌唐野生动物保护区(CWLS)内自由放养的狗对牲畜和野生动物的捕食模式。利用空间显性捕获-再捕获框架中的多边形搜索和区块计数收集了以下信息:(a) 10 个地点的狗数量;(b) 利用粪便分析收集了狗的饮食(n = 205);(c) 通过问卷访谈收集了牧民对狗的看法(n = 210)。狗的密度介于每 100 平方公里 10 到 310 只之间,在人类居住地及其周围地区狗的密度较高。他们的食物主要由牲畜(74.29%)和野生物种(13.06%)构成。在野生猎物中,鸟类(4.49%)、袋鼠(3.67%)、啮齿类(2.45%)和藏野驴(1.63%)在狗的食物中出现率较高。当地人承认,狗对牲畜和野生动物构成威胁。由于无人饲养的放养狗会伤害牲畜和野生动物,约 40% 的受访者对狗有负面看法。这种看法因职业而异,牧民比非牧民更消极(P < 0.001)。我们建议,需要确定或制定有效机制来管理生态和经济敏感地区的狗群,以尽量减少威胁,保护濒危野生动物和当地生计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Do we need to unfriend a few friends? Free-ranging dogs affect wildlife and pastoralists in the Indian Trans-Himalaya

Do we need to unfriend a few friends? Free-ranging dogs affect wildlife and pastoralists in the Indian Trans-Himalaya

Do we need to unfriend a few friends? Free-ranging dogs affect wildlife and pastoralists in the Indian Trans-Himalaya

Dogs Canis lupus familiaris, among canids, have emerged as the most successful predators and facultative scavengers, and have prevented other carnivores from approaching human habitats through intraguild competition. Over time with increasing population and livestock predation, they have become a matter of concern for pastoralists. The present study was conducted to understand the patterns of free-ranging dogs' predation on livestock and wildlife, from 2015 to 2017 in Changthang Wildlife Sanctuary (CWLS), Ladakh, India. Information was collected on (a) dog populations in 10 sites using polygon search in Spatially Explicit Capture-Recapture framework and block count, (b) their diet using scat analysis (n = 205) and (c) perceptions of pastoralists towards dogs through questionnaire-based interviews (n = 210). Dog densities varied between 10 and 310 individuals/100 km2 and were high in and around human habitations. A major part of their diet constituted of livestock (74.29%) and wild species (13.06%). Among wild prey species, birds (4.49%), lagomorphs (3.67%), rodents (2.45%) and Tibetan wild ass (1.63%) had high occurrence in dog diet. The local people admitted that dogs pose a threat to livestock and wildlife. As unowned free-ranging dogs harm livestock and wildlife, about 40% of the respondents had negative perceptions towards them. The perception varied with occupation and pastoralists were more negative than non-pastoralists (P < 0.001). We suggest that effective mechanisms need to be identified or developed to manage dog populations in ecologically and economically sensitive areas to minimise the threats and safeguard the endangered wildlife and local livelihoods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Conservation
Animal Conservation 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Animal Conservation provides a forum for rapid publication of novel, peer-reviewed research into the conservation of animal species and their habitats. The focus is on rigorous quantitative studies of an empirical or theoretical nature, which may relate to populations, species or communities and their conservation. We encourage the submission of single-species papers that have clear broader implications for conservation of other species or systems. A central theme is to publish important new ideas of broad interest and with findings that advance the scientific basis of conservation. Subjects covered include population biology, epidemiology, evolutionary ecology, population genetics, biodiversity, biogeography, palaeobiology and conservation economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信